USA TODAY International Edition

Brazen shoplifter­s in Calif. have stores cutting hours

Viral videos show thieves hauling goods from stores with no one stopping them.

- Christal Hayes

LOS ANGELES – The man laid a large black garbage bag on the ground of a Walgreens and nonchalant­ly grabbed products from shelves and threw them in before he hauled the goods out of the San Francisco store on his bicycle.

Footage of the incident and viral videos of thefts in stores in the area are examples of what retailers call a drastic rise in retail thefts nationwide.

California has two of the top five cities most targeted by organized retail thefts. Some of the largest shopping chains took unpreceden­ted steps to cut store hours, beef up security measures or close locations entirely.

Retailers, officials and criminal justice advocates point the finger at one another in attempting to explain the phenomenon. Some blame a shift in state laws that lowered penalties for the crimes. Others point to the nature of the crime shifting from run- of- the- mill shopliftin­g to organized criminal rings, thanks in part to the explosive growth of online marketplac­es that allow reselling of stolen goods.

Shopliftin­g in stores is a common problem, but retailers have clamored for help to stop organized retail thefts, in which members of a group work together to steal merchandis­e and sometimes resell the products, a practice that can fund other criminal activity.

In its annual survey, the National Retail Federation found such crimes cost U. S. retailers an average of more than $ 719,000 per $ 1 billion in sales in 2020, a relatively small number but one that has grown.

The amount of organized retail thefts has nearly doubled since 2015 when organized retail thefts cost retailers about $ 453,000 per $ 1 billion in sales.

The survey includes the top 10 cities that retailers said were most affected by these crimes. At the top of the list was Los Angeles, followed by Chicago, Miami and New York. San Francisco came in at No. 5 and Sacramento at 10.

Seventy- five percent of retailers reported seeing some increase in organized retail thefts throughout 2020, and many said they changed policies, curbing returns and allocating more resources for loss prevention and technology to slow the stream of thefts.

Many retailers placed placing more products behind security locks, adding security cameras and tags to prevent goods from being taken. More hired security guards.

Home Depot installed Bluetooth technology in some of its power tools that, if not activated at a register at checkout, won't work after they're taken from a store.

In San Francisco, off- duty police officers stand guard at stores in hopes of deterring thefts, though most retailers have policies discouragi­ng employees or guards from physically stopping people out of fears for safety or potential lawsuits.

Retailers claim thefts have grown out of control, though data from the San Francisco Police Department shows thefts are down 9% compared with last year.

Along with the footage of a man calmly loading merchandis­e into a trash bag in a San Francisco Walgreens, another viral video shows a group of men running from a Neiman Marcus store, arms filled with luxury purses and other stolen merchandis­e.

Retailers said people shoplift in mass quantities and sell the stolen goods in online marketplac­es, allowing sellers a sense of anonymity.

Walgreens has closed 17 of its stores in the past five years, largely because of thefts, according to Phil Caruso, a spokesman for the drugstore chain.

Caruso told USA TODAY that retail thefts in San Francisco are four times the national average, which has resulted in the chain spending $ 10 million a year on security, more than 35 times its average across the country.

Target announced this month all of its stores in the city would close at 6 p. m. because of crime – a move the retailer told USA TODAY hadn't been employed anywhere else in the country.

“This whole thing has actually been going on for a while now, and retailers have been very concerned about it,” said Rachel Michelin, president of the California Retailer's Associatio­n. “It's just kind of hit a, you know, DEFCON 5, I guess now with these videos and seeing some of the changes in stores.”

She said some retailers have become discourage­d and stopped reporting such crimes, perceiving an unwillingn­ess to prosecute them.

The San Francisco District Attorney's Office rebutted such claims and pointed to its retail theft task force aimed at breaking up criminal theft rings. One operation last year recovered more than $ 8 million in stolen merchandis­e.

“No retailer or its employees should have to suffer from brazen, organized thefts. These crimes are profitable because of the vast criminal network behind them, which our office is dismantlin­g,” said Rachel Marshall, a spokeswoma­n for the office.

In its survey, the National Retail Federation said retailers cited changing laws and penalties as one of the primary drivers of increased thefts, noting criminals took advantage of laws that increased the threshold of what is considered a felony.

The survey said many states adjusted this threshold and criminals have stolen more goods, knowing penalties won't be as severe. Nearly two- thirds of retailers reported an increase in organized retail thefts since changes in laws.

In a study released in 2017, Pew Charitable Trusts found that although more than three dozen states raised the amount criminals could steal before a crime was charged as a felony, it had no effect overall on property crime or larceny. States that raised the threshold reported about the same amount of crime as others that did not.

California voters passed Propositio­n 47 in 2014, which raised the felony threshold for shopliftin­g from $ 450 to $ 950.

Charis Kubrin, a professor at the University of California, Irvine, studied Propositio­n 47 and found the law had little to no effect on crime, and though there was a small increase in larcenies and auto thefts, the shift was “nonexisten­t at best, very modest at worst.” Kubrin noted multiple examinatio­ns, including a study focusing on Los Angeles, came to the same conclusion.

“You hear these anecdotes, like people walking around with calculator­s adding up how much they can steal without being charged with a felony and you see the videos of people just running out of stores. But we've had a lot of unrest. We've had a pandemic. We have high unemployme­nt rates. We have economic issues,” she said. “So the thought that all of this is because of Prop. 47, well, if we're going to base that hunch on anything, it should go back to what the previous handful of studies have found. And so far, it's that Prop. 47 doesn't seem to be the culprit – or at least the major culprit.”

Criminal justice advocates defended the measure, noting it was proposed in the midst of staggering overcrowdi­ng in the state's prison system.

Lenore Anderson, president of California­ns for Safety and Justice, which helped write Propositio­n 47, said the measure saved the state hundreds of millions of dollars in incarcerat­ion fees and those savings go to recovery and diversion programs in communitie­s that need them.

“People seem to think California did something incredibly progressiv­e with passing Prop. 47. The truth is the state was a laggard," she said, noting that many states have much higher felony thresholds for theft. “This blame game is par for the course and honestly explains why it's so hard to change the criminal justice system."

Some retailers hope federal legislatio­n could be a saving grace.

Jason Brewer, a spokesman for the national Retail Industry Leaders Associatio­n, said retailers advocate for the INFORM Consumers Act, a measure aimed at China and counterfei­t goods. It would force online marketplac­es, such as Facebook, eBay, Craigslist and Amazon, to authentica­te informatio­n about sellers and products.

The rise in online marketplac­es, especially amid the coronaviru­s pandemic, created a “perfect storm” of sorts, Brewer said, noting the measure could cut off some of the financial incentive for these crimes.

“One of the big reasons that frankly needs more attention is the anonymity of the internet and online marketplac­es,” Brewer said. “It has made it very lucrative to sell stolen goods online. Twenty years ago, you didn't have as many choices, and it was much riskier to do. Now, it's simple, so this could really have a huge impact.”

 ?? JUSTIN SULLIVAN/ GETTY IMAGES ?? Walgreens has closed some stores in recent years because of retail thefts.
JUSTIN SULLIVAN/ GETTY IMAGES Walgreens has closed some stores in recent years because of retail thefts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States