USA TODAY International Edition

Pack fans right to wonder if Rodgers all- in

- Pete Dougherty

GREEN BAY, Wis. – Maybe the hardest thing to square with the Packers’ abysmal play against the Saints in the season opener last Sunday was Aaron Rodgers’ performanc­e in training camp.

Put it this way: This might not have been his best camp, but it’s hard to remember one where he was sharper. Yet he opened the season with one of the worst games of his career.

After the game against the Saints – moved from New Orleans to Jacksonvil­le, Florida, because of the aftermath of Hurricane Ida – and on Pat McAfee’s radio show last week, Rodgers gave off the same feeling he did in November 2016, when the Packers were 4- 6 and he wasn’t playing particular­ly well ( 96.0 rating to that point). You might remember that’s when he made his famous “run the table” playoff prediction, which he then fulfilled by playing some of the best football of his career.

“Right now we’re taking it on the chin, which we should,” he told McAfee. “Pretty soon it will be flipped. I’m confident and happy and excited and love these guys. I’m a competitor. Frustrated by myself and our performanc­e. This game is about how you respond to the negativity usually more than how you’re hailed for your successes.”

Rodgers’ performanc­e a week ago ( 36.8 rating, fourth lowest of his career as a starter) opens him up to questions about his commitment to the team, and that’s only fair. After all, he tried hard to get the Packers to trade him in the offseason, and he waited until just before the start of camp to agree to show up, with a year shaved off his contract to boot.

Hard to blame anybody who might wonder whether his heart is in it with this organizati­on. When news broke last offseason that he badly wanted out, I initially thought the Packers would have to trade him for that reason. After all, who wants a quarterbac­k who’s not allin? That position is way too important to have anything else.

It took me several months to realize this isn’t 2018, when Rodgers had just signed a huge contract extension and held little faith in former coach Mike McCarthy’s offense. Rodgers has more at stake now because he’s three years closer to the end of his career. He surely wants a second Super Bowl win to bolster his standing among the game’s alltime greats and knows this year’s Packers give him a real chance. And if he wants out next year, he needs to show prospectiv­e teams he still has plenty of good football left in him.

Really, what if last Sunday was simply a case of the full- of- themselves Packers facing a team that has the ingredient­s that have always had the best chance of beating Rodgers?

Going all the way back to when Rodgers emerged as an elite player, teams most successful against the Packers have had three qualities: a pass rush that can consistent­ly get pressure with four guys, enough depth at cornerback where there’s not a weak link Rodgers can exploit on key downs, and a quarterbac­k good enough to put up some points.

That was the Giants in the 2011 playoffs, all the way through the Buccaneers last season. And it was the Saints last week, though many of us didn’t realize that going in.

The Saints have two excellent pass rushers in Cameron Jordan ( 94 1⁄ sacks)

2 and Marcus Davenport, whom you might remember as the guy the Saints targeted when they traded into the Packers’ No. 14 spot in the 2018 draft. He keeps getting hurt, but when healthy Davenport is a talented player who against the Packers had a sack, a quarterbac­k hit and two tackles for a loss.

The Saints are solid at cornerback, where they have Marshon Lattimore, he of the brand- new $ 96.5 million contract; Paulson Adebo, a third- round rookie who had an intercepti­on and pass breakup; and C. J. Gardner- Johnson, a sound nickel cornerback in his third year in the NFL.

They also have a very talented if flawed quarterbac­k in Jameis Winston, who looked much more patient playing for Saints coach Sean Payton than in his previous stint with Tampa Bay. Bad on Packers defensive coordinato­r Joe Barry for not pressuring Winston into an intercepti­on or two. Good on Winston for playing an efficient game ( 130.8 rating, no turnovers).

That might be a blueprint for beating Rodgers, but not many teams have all three of those things.

That’s why it’s hard not to consider the Packers among the favorites in the NFC despite their horrendous opener. They still have plenty of talent at key positions, and Rodgers showed no sign of decline as a passer in camp even though he’s not the athlete he was five years ago or even three.

“I think you saw last year when I can play on time in the pocket obviously I can be really accurate and we can get humming on offense,” Rodgers said. “That’s the goal. ... I like to stay in the pocket as much as possible. It just comes down to footwork. When I’m throwing the ball on time and in rhythm, we’re pretty effective. So I just have to find that rhythm and timing this week that we didn’t have last week.”

If Rodgers feels ambivalent about returning to the Packers, he has hidden it well since he showed up at camp. His atpeace vibe in interviews is the same as last year, when he came off as happy and committed regardless of what we’ve come to find he felt deep down for the front office. His comments since the Saints debacle are consistent with how he was when the team struggled in the past – “R- E- L- A- X” after a 1- 2 start in 2014, “run the table” in ’ 16.

“If we’re starting to freak out after one week, we’re in big trouble,” Rodgers told local reporters Thursday.

After the performanc­e he and his teammates put up in the opener, their play against the Lions on Monday night will say a lot about this team.

 ?? BOB SELF/ THE FLORIDA TIMES- UNION ?? Aaron Rodgers was sacked once and picked off twice by the Saints in the Packers’ Week 1 loss.
BOB SELF/ THE FLORIDA TIMES- UNION Aaron Rodgers was sacked once and picked off twice by the Saints in the Packers’ Week 1 loss.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States