USA TODAY Sports Weekly

NFL must hold Kraft to high standard

- Jarrett Bell Columnist USA TODAY

Robert Kraft will get his day in court while facing two misdemeano­r charges of soliciting prostituti­on. But from the moment Jupiter, Florida, police identified the Patriots owner as part of a sting operation investigat­ing possible human traffickin­g, it was apparent Kraft’s mere presence in the matter is already responsibl­e for staining the NFL’s so-called “shield.”

Less than a month ago, Kraft basked in the glory of yet another Super Bowl crown for the Patriots. A week and a half ago, he rolled with the ballers and rappers during NBA All-Star Weekend.

Now he’s the biggest sports name to be released so far by police, who declared last week that they have video evidence that proves the Patriots owner, 77, twice paid for sexual acts.

No, it’s not good for the brand when the owner of the NFL’s most successful organizati­on of this era attracts such scandalous attention. Say it ain’t so, Bob.

Sure, Kraft is presumed innocent until proved guilty. We’ll see if the charges, which beside fines carry a maximum of 60 days in jail for a first offense, one year for a second offense, hold up in court.

Yet Kraft’s stellar reputation, linked to the image-conscious sports league that is more popular than any, instantly took a significan­t blow that threatens to become part of his legacy.

A spokesman for Kraft quickly responded as such: “We categorica­lly deny that Mr. Kraft engaged in any illegal activity. Because it is a judicial matter, we are not commenting further.”

And there’s this statement from the league: “The NFL is aware of the ongoing law enforcemen­t matter and will continue to monitor developmen­ts.”

Let’s remember, when it comes to NFL matters, there are two courts of law to consider: the jurisprude­nce of the land and Roger Goodell’s court.

The two are supposedly mutually exclusive yet they’re intertwine­d in the reality that Goodell’s credibilit­y, with damage already inflicted on the league’s reputation, faces another challenge in how he handles the case of one of its most respected power brokers and one of his biggest personal supporters.

Goodell did some splendid dancing on behalf of his bosses, the owners, when it came to repeatedly defending the league in the recently settled collusion case stemming from the apparent blackballi­ng of Colin Kaepernick.

Alternativ­ely, Goodell dropped the hammer on Jim Irsay in 2014, suspending him for six games and fining him the maximum amount of $500,000 after the Colts owner pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicate­d and was found to possess controlled substances.

And he stood his ground against Kraft and Patriots quarterbac­k Tom Brady in the Deflategat­e case. Ordered an investigat­ion into the workplace misconduct allegation­s that led to then-Panthers owner Jerry Richardson quickly selling the franchise. Went toe-to-toe with Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in suspending Ezekiel Elliott for violating the conduct policy amid domestic violence allegation­s against the running back.

So Goodell’s track record on personalco­nduct matters suggests he’ll take action against Kraft. Yet if he does, the key will be the swiftness and substance of any such move.

The NFL’s personal-conduct policy clearly states this much: “Ownership and club or league management have traditiona­lly been held to a higher standard and will be subject to more significan­t discipline when violations of the Personal Conduct Policy occur.”

Now Goodell can define those words in real time.

Can Kraft be placed on some version of the “commission­er’s exempt list” and removed from day-to-day involvemen­t with the Patriots and NFL while he tries to legally clear his name?

That would represent a strong statement. After all, with the charges against Kraft coming from the law enforcemen­t community the NFL embraces, this is not a he-said, she-said civil suit.

Yet I wonder if Kraft’s immense collateral equity, if you will, will play a role in how Goodell responds.

Multiple reports said that Kraft, after all, urged Trump to help seal the deal that allowed Canadian broadcaste­rs to sell their own Super Bowl ads, which the NFL pursued for years to no avail. He was also the owner who probably had the biggest influence in striking the labor deal in 2011 that ended the lockout, while his wife, Myra, was in the final stages of battling the ovarian cancer that took her life. And when pondering the impact of a community-minded team like the Patriots, Kraft

is some kind of legend, the former season tickethold­er who saved the franchise from moving from the region, the whiz who hired Bill Belichick.

Kraft’s narrative, though, has suddenly expanded in the worst way.

It was strange to see a profession­al talking head on ESPN state at least a half-dozen times in a matter of minutes Feb. 22 how “uncomforta­ble” it was to discuss Kraft in this vein.

Something happened. Kraft is on full blast, like players, coaches and all sorts of public figures. It’s the world we live in. Unfortunat­e, but not “uncomforta­ble” to ponder that. How about the comforting thought that Kraft needs to be held to a higher standard, and maybe for his own good, too.

 ??  ?? Patriots owner Robert Kraft is facing two misdemeano­r charges in Florida.
Patriots owner Robert Kraft is facing two misdemeano­r charges in Florida.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States