USA TODAY US Edition

Colombia scandal exposes sex traffickin­g growth

- By Kirsten Powers Kirsten Powers is a columnist at The Daily Beast and political analyst on Fox News. She is also a member of USA TODAY'S Board of Contributo­rs.

When the news first broke, the headlines seemed shocking: U.S. Secret Service agents buy prostitute­s while in Cartagena, Colombia, advancing a trip for President Obama. But this is no aberration. Men working abroad on behalf of our government engage in this kind of behavior so frequently that the Pentagon was forced in 2004 to draft an anti-prostituti­on rule aimed at preventing the U.S. military from being complicit in fueling sex traffickin­g.

So far, 11 Secret Service personnel — including agents and uniformed officers — have been recalled from Colombia, put on administra­tive leave and had their security clearances revoked. Rep. Darrell Issa, who chairs one of the House investigat­ive panels, has said that he wasn’t certain whether Congress would hold hearings into the scandal.

Pending completion of an investigat­ion, we do not know about the background­s of these women. But there is clear evidence that men who cavort with prostitute­s are often guilty of participat­ing in sex traffickin­g, a grave human rights offense that our society continues to treat as nothing more than “boys being boys.”

Yes, the fact that the agents put the president at risk is enormously important. But where is the outrage about how these men treated human beings like property to be bought and sold? Not a new problem

In 2004, at a Capitol Hill forum, Rep. Christophe­r Smith, R-N.J., noted that “women and girls are being forced into prostituti­on for a clientele consisting largely of military services members, government contractor­s and internatio­nal peacekeepe­rs.”

In Canadian journalist Victor Malarek’s 2003 book, The Natashas: Inside the New Global Sex Trade, he writes extensivel­y about U.S. contractor­s for Dyncorp in Bosnia openly buying what they call “prostitute­s,” who were, in fact, sex slaves. He writes of one man who “had this (15-year old) girl who was just a child. . . . You could see in her face — she was dying.”

Girls were kidnapped from Eastern Europe by the Bosnian mafia, according to Malarek, specifical­ly to be sold to the American contractor­s to use for sex. The author writes how one American bragged that his girl wasn’t a day over 12. Traffickin­g would not work without the “johns” paying up to use some kidnapped and abused girl or woman for a few hours of pleasure. Colombia’s sex tourism

According to the U.S. State Department, in Colombia, “The forced prostituti­on of women and children from rural areas in urban areas remains a ... problem.” The State Department notes, “Colombia also is a destinatio­n for foreign child sex tourists, particular­ly coastal cities such as Cartagena.” Indeed, for this reason Colombia is known as the “Thailand of Latin America.”

Representa­tives of the U.S. government should be setting the standard for the world, not feeding the problem of sex traffickin­g. The chances that the women or girls the Secret Service agents procured for their pleasure were there by free will is very low. Most likely, they were sex slaves.

The club where the agents went to buy the women has been described as a dingy, windowless brick building. Sex traffickin­g survivors would tell you that what goes on in such dingy windowless buildings is nothing less than torture.

We have a global epidemic of sex traffickin­g, and President Obama and members of Congress should take this opportunit­y to express the outrage that should be the natural reaction to slavery.

 ?? AP ?? Colombia: “Thailand of Latin America.”
AP Colombia: “Thailand of Latin America.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States