USA TODAY US Edition

HALT PRIVATE PRISON QUOTAS

- David Person David Person hosts WEUP Talk on WEUP 94.5 FM/1700 AM in Huntsville, Ala., and is a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributo­rs.

Our nation is numb, President Obama said this month while announcing his My Brother’s Keeper initiative. So numb that we are nonchalant about the overwhelmi­ng numbers of black and brown boys who end up in prison. “We just assume this is an inevitable part of American life, instead of the outrage that it is,” Obama said.

What should disturb us even more is that prisoners have become a commodity, thanks to the growing relationsh­ip between private prisons and state government­s. The states that go into business with for-profit prisons sign contracts that essentiall­y agree to maintain quotas on the number of prisoners. If they can’t keep the prison population­s at the agreed upon levels, the states must pay the difference.

Younger, healthier inmates are most often minority

Often, private prisons also want inmates who are younger and healthier, which makes them less expensive to house. Older prisoners tend to be white, and younger inmates tend to be minorities, a fact supported by a recent study based on Bureau of Justice Statistics published in the Radical Criminolog­y journal by University of California-Berkeley doctoral candidate Christophe­r Petrella.

In the nine states Petrella studied, the percentage of black and brown inmates is higher in the for-profit prisons than the state-owned ones. In Texas, for example, 69% of prisoners in these private institutio­ns are people of color, compared with 57% in the public prisons. In California, 89% of private prison inmates are persons of color, compared with 76% in public facilities.

While private prisons currently house only 8% of the U.S. inmate population, its numbers are rising and the public prison population is declining. The two largest private prison companies are Correction­s Corp. of America and The Geo Group. Together, they own and operate 132 facilities nationwide that generate $3.3 billion annually.

Michelle Alexander, author of the best-seller The New Jim Crow, told me that the process that matches what the private prisons want is already in place. “Our (minority) communitie­s have been targeted in ways, particular­ly in the drug war, that would be unthinkabl­e in white communitie­s,” Alexander said.

In the 1980s, as the war on drugs escalated, prison population­s exploded, in large part as a result of mandatory minimum sentences. But in recent years, bipartisan congressio­nal and Obama administra­tion efforts have begun to ease the negative impact of the war on drugs.

In 2010, Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act, closing the wide disparity between sentencing for possession and sale of crack (used and sold more by blacks) vs. powder cocaine (used and sold more by whites).

Last year, when Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., co-sponsored the Justice Safety Valve Act to ease mandatory sentencing, he equated the war on drugs with racist Jim Crow policies.

Attorney General Eric Holder has urged shorter mandatory minimum drug sentences for non-violent offenders.

Hopefully, Petrella’s study will help states rethink doing business with private prisons. But it should also awaken our nation to the immorality of selling prison cells to the highest bidder, and then using controvers­ial quota policies to fill them with younger inmates, who tend to be predominan­tly black and brown.

If we continue to ignore this trend, our modern prisons will look no different from the plantation­s of old.

 ?? THOMAS B. SHEA FOR USA TODAY ?? States sign contracts with for-profit prisons that essentiall­y agree to maintain quotas on the number of inmates.
THOMAS B. SHEA FOR USA TODAY States sign contracts with for-profit prisons that essentiall­y agree to maintain quotas on the number of inmates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States