USA TODAY US Edition

‘Right to die’ exploits human vulnerabil­ity

- Kirsten Powers Kirsten Powers writes weekly for USA TODAY and is author of The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech.

After success in California — the fifth state where doctors are now free to prescribe lethal doses of medication to terminally ill or dying patients — “right-to-die” activists have turned their eyes to Maryland, New York and beyond.

“This is a national wave,” Maryland Del. Shane Pendergras­s told The Washington Post. Pendergras­s plans to sponsor rightto-die legislatio­n in January.

It’s a wave with the potential to sweep some of society’s most vulnerable — the elderly, the terminally ill and disabled — prematurel­y into the hereafter.

When Oregonian octogenari­an Kate Cheney was diagnosed with terminal cancer, she sought a prescripti­on to end her life. The first doctor denied the request due to concerns about Cheney’s mental capacity and her daughter’s aggressive­ness. A second doctor deemed Cheney mentally competent but noted that her “choices may be influenced by her family’s wishes, and her daughter, Erika, may be somewhat coercive.” Months later, Cheney gathered with her family, drank the deadly mixture provided by her doctor and died.

Leonie Herx, a Canadian palliative care doctor, wrote this year, “Let’s not kid ourselves or cloak reality with soft words — physician-assisted death is killing.”

But verbal cloaking is the stock in trade of the right-to-die forces. For starters, no one is being denied the right to die. What some are trying to prevent is the drafting of doctors into the death business. Physicians are meant to help us heal or provide relief from pain. They aren’t supposed to play assistant in a suicide.

Rocky Shaw, president of the California State Coroners Associatio­n, told the Los Angeles Times that before California’s new law passed, if someone took a lethal dose of drugs it would be ruled a suicide. But the new law states that “death resulting from the self-administra­tion of an aid-indying drug is not suicide.” This, according to Shaw, “leaves a question about how to classify” a physician-assisted death.

Assisted-suicide advocates claim they merely want to help people avoid pain in their final days. But according to Oregon’s public health department, the top reasons given for physician-assisted suicide in the state are loss of autonomy (91.4%), decreased ability to engage in enjoyable activities (86.7%), loss of dignity (71.4%), loss of control of bodily functions (49.5%) and becoming a burden on others (40%).

Is anyone ashamed that we live in a culture where people believe that if they aren’t autonomous or might be a burden on others that they should ingest drugs to die?

This attitude is reminiscen­t of “the Quietus,” as it was called in P.D. James’ dystopian novel The

Children of Men. Elderly people, who were viewed as a drain on society’s resources, would don white garments and commit mass suicide in a ceremony covered approvingl­y by the media. It turned out that many were drugged and coerced by the government.

Today, sadly, the coercion seems to be coming from closer to home.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States