Inmates feel scar of solitary confinement
Of 9 prisoners released in 2002, all came back
Silvestre Segovia had vowed many times over that he would never return to solitary confinement.
Languishing in the vast Texas prison system’s solitary confinement wings for more than a decade had exacted a heavy emotional toll. There was so much to discover about a new world that confronted him on a much-anticipated exit that chilly morning Nov. 15, 2002. A loyal girlfriend waited 255 miles away. There might even be a market for the catalog of detailed sketches he had created to pass the years of numbing isolation. Where to begin? Since 2002, USA TODAY has tracked nine Texas offenders released that November day, including Segovia, all of whom spent prolonged periods in isolation, either as punishment for misconduct in prison or for their association with criminal gangs. Segovia and the eight other inmates freed from solitary on the same day have all returned at least once — and some multiple times. Some describe a type of sensory paralysis that seemed to overwhelm them once they were finally free, a troubling consequence of the most extreme condition of confinement that has recently drawn the scrutiny of the Justice Department, prison officials and lawmakers across the USA.
For all the enthusiasm Segovia harbored for a new start on the outside, the lasting effects of the harsh experience on the inside appeared to hold him back. After settling in with Ortencia Rosales, now his wife, he would spend many days sitting in the dark. The small living room of their Kerr-
“Research still confirms what this court suggested over a century ago: Years on end of near-total isolation exact a terrible price.” Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
ville home was at first almost too overwhelming to navigate, compared with the cramped cell he occupied for 23 hours every day. Ineligible for substance abuse treatment because of his placement in segregation, he repeatedly succumbed on the outside to a longtime source of personal ruin, alcohol, picking up three drunken driving charges in five months.
It is no surprise that he is back in a more familiar place — solitary confinement. Alone in a windowless cell, no more than 8 by 10 feet, is a place where at various times he has spent nearly half of his 43 years. The conditions of confinement are indeed extreme for drunken driving offenses, yet Segovia’s past association with the Mexican Mafia prison gang has made his segregation mandatory.
“When I look back, I can’t believe it,” Segovia said in a recent interview.
For many of the nine Texas inmates, their lives after their release from solitary have taken tragic turns:
Adam Morales described a perpetual state of vertigo after his release in 2002. He often found balance by walking with his back to walls. He returned to solitary two years after he was freed. He is scheduled for release in 2021.
Angel Coronado, who has returned to prison four times in 13 years, has struggled with weekly bouts of depression in which he is rendered virtually uncommunicative. His most recent release came in August, and he has been unemployed since.
Convicted murderer Bruce Butler, rearrested for burglary two years after release, was described in recent parole documents as possessing “elements of brutality” that make him a “continuing threat to public safety” after years locked down. He is scheduled for release in 2025.
Their experiences and those of thousands of others are real-life exhibits in a fast-accelerating debate over solitary confinement’s place in the American penal system. The extreme conditions are a legacy of harsh criminal justice policies, enacted more than a generation ago, that are part of a broader re-examination, from statehouses across the country to the White House. ‘A GRAVE PROBLEM’ In September, the Association of State Correctional Administrators, a coalition of state and federal prison authorities, characterized the prolonged isolation of offenders as “a grave problem” in the USA, where little information exists to evaluate confinement conditions, the policies governing assignments to segregation and the numbers of people being held in such conditions.
In perhaps the most comprehensive audit of “administrative segregation” in the USA, the association of prison administrators and Yale Law School concluded in September that as many as 100,000 people were held in some form of restricted housing in America’s prisons. (The number did not include inmates in jails, juvenile detention, immigration holding facilities or military prisons.)
A decade ago, according to the report, estimates varied from 25,000 to 80,000.
“Most jurisdictions had no fixed time limits on administrative segregation,” the report found. “In a substantial number, people remained in segregation for more than three years.”
In the 30 prison systems that tracked how inmates were prepared for release, the report found, about 4,400 offenders were released directly from solitary to their communities in 2013 without undergoing a transition period.
Last month, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether solitary constituted cruel and unusual punishment even for those awaiting execution. The court declined to consider the case, yet Justice Anthony Kennedy raised serious questions about the practice.
“Research still confirms what this court suggested over a century ago: Years on end of near-total isolation exact a terrible price,” Kennedy said in an opinion in June on another case.
In March, Kennedy offered an even more blunt assessment. “Solitary confinement,” the justice told a congressional panel, “literally drives men mad.”
Silvestre Segovia does not resemble a “madman.” But the battle waged most every day to maintain a semblance of psychological equilibrium is plain.
There have been no visitors in nearly four years, except for an interview with USA TODAY. His wife, Ortencia, cannot afford the 350-mile trip that would require at least one night in a hotel with her two young children. As a result, human contact has been reduced to interactions with corrections officers or “yelling ” through the walls at other inmates along the narrow wing of cells.
The days are roughly organized around meal deliveries: breakfast at 3 a.m., lunch at 10 a.m. and dinner at 3 p.m. Until recently, when he was moved to a cell with a partial view of a distant window, there was often no telling day or night.
“I can see a little light now,” he said excitedly, as if reporting a major new discovery. The hour he gets to exercise — alone — in a covered pen is the time that he most “feels alive.”
There are occasions, Segovia said, when mental health counselors are available. Though he has considered seeking help, Segovia has largely resisted for fear of incurring the wrath of other inmates who closely watch for such things from their cell doors.
“They would say, ‘He’s losing his mind,’ ” Segovia said, acknowledging rigid resistance among most inmates against betraying any personal weakness that another could attempt to exploit. “The next thing you know, I’m a full-blown lunatic.”
Barring an early parole (his case is under consideration), Segovia has slightly more than six years remaining on a term, all of it likely to be served alone in the same spartan cell where his detailed drawings, letters to Ortencia and fondness for John Grisham novels fill the unending voids. The only possible option for improving his conditions of confinement — assignment to general population — would require a repudiation of his long association with the Mexican Mafia.
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice has a renouncement program for “threat group” members, though Segovia said that even consideration of such an option would probably put him in considerable jeopardy.
He is clearly not comfortable publicly discussing the matter and politely puts an end to it.
“I shouldn’t talk about that,” he said. REDUCING THE NUMBERS Segovia is one of more than 5,000 Texas offenders held in segregation. Although the state has historically maintained some of the largest numbers in solitary, Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman Jason Clark said officials have been moving to cut those numbers along with the overall prison population, which stands at about 150,000.
Since 2006, Clark said, the administrative segregation population has dropped from 9,542 to 5,602 as of July 2015. Clark said the state employs a variety of diversion programs, including gang renouncement, to drive the numbers down. More than 4,500 offenders have completed the disassociation program, known as GRAD, since its start 15 years ago. An additional 255 are likely to complete renouncement requirements by the end of this year.
“Public safety is paramount,” Clark said, adding that there has been a recognition that such inmates represent an increased risk of failed assimilation once they are released. “We want to make sure that when they are getting out, they are not coming back. This is not just a Texas thing, it’s nationwide.”
Last month, some New York lawmakers and advocates for alternatives to solitary called for an end to such conditions of confinement. According to the report by Yale Law School and the association of prison administrators, about 4,000 of 53,000 New York inmates were held in some form of restricted housing last year.
In September, California officials settled a federal class-action lawsuit that would effectively end indeterminate terms of solitary confinement for prisoners based solely on gang affiliation.
The legal action, brought three years ago on behalf of offenders held in segregation at the state’s Pelican Bay prison, limits the amount of time offenders can be held in isolation. When the case was filed, according to the Center for Constitutional Rights, more than 500 prisoners had been assigned to solitary for more than a decade, and 78 had languished there for more than 20 years.
John Moriarty, the Texas prison system’s former inspector general, said that despite widespread criticism of solitary’s broad application, “there are some people who need to be locked up 24-7, segregated from the rest of the population.” When violent gangs ruled some Texas institutions in the mid-1980s, Moriarty said, solitary proved an “outstanding management tool.”
“At the same time, I understand that there are a lot of issues to consider, including the effect of prolonged isolation,” Moriarty said. “I believe in it, but it’s got to be used wisely, and decisions have to be made by educated people with the input of psychologists and other professionals.”
Ortencia Segovia knows that whenever her husband comes home, his transition to the free world will not be easy, just as it wasn’t before.
When he arrived home in 2002, having no job and few prospects, he had been isolated for 10 years after a robbery conviction. Like eight other inmates that day, he was released straight from solitary to the street. There were no re-entry programs, just a bus ticket and $100, some of which he blew on wine coolers, a product line that debuted while he was locked down. It took some time just to adjust to his new living space, a room that immediately felt like a football stadium compared with his tiny cell.
Then there was the morning, shortly after his return, when Ortencia went to wake Segovia in their bedroom. “I touched him, and he had his fist raised, ready to hit me,” she said, adding that Segovia told her that even in solitary confinement “you kept one eye open while you slept.”
His homecoming is likely to be more complicated this time. In addition to Ortencia, there are two young children waiting, Destinee, 10, and Paul, 9.
“I know he is strong,” said Ortencia, who supports the small family as a home health care worker. “I know he can take what comes; I know he’s missing us.”
Segovia said he believes he has the strength to defeat the demons of isolation and make it to the other side, where he intends to remain this time.
“I just don’t want to let this place get to me.”