USA TODAY US Edition

Opposing view A terrible deal for travelers

- Peter DeFazio Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon is the senior Democrat on the House Committee on Transporta­tion and Infrastruc­ture.

Recently, the House Committee on Transporta­tion and Infrastruc­ture considered the AIRR Act, legislatio­n with a controvers­ial provision that would spin off the nation’s air traffic control (ATC) system to a private corporatio­n, run by a 13-person, industry-dominated board. I led the opposition to this controvers­ial proposal.

When considerin­g changes to the most complex ATC system in the world, safety must be our No. 1 priority. Unfortunat­ely, the AIRR Act would jeopardize safety by splitting the FAA in two and leaving safety programs and more than 7,400 FAA safety employees vulnerable to congressio­nal budget cuts and shutdowns. It also would sever ties between the Department of Defense and the ATC system, which have protected the American public during national emergencie­s.

Not only would the AIRR Act jeopardize funding for aviation safety, it’s a terrible deal for the traveling public. The corporatio­n could pick winners and losers by setting ATC standards without public oversight. The AIRR Act would give the corporatio­n the ability to tax American consumers to pay for the ATC system. The corporatio­n would decide flight routes and could disregard aircraft noise issues. It could also jeopardize access to the aviation system in smaller cities and rural communitie­s. Finally, the AIRR Act would give valuable publicly owned ATC assets to the corporatio­n for free, while leaving taxpayers to bail out the corporatio­n if it can’t pay to operate the system.

There is bipartisan agreement that the FAA needs real reform. I offered an amendment that struck the ATC privatizat­ion plan and protected our annual $16 billion investment in our aviation system from congressio­nal dysfunctio­n by moving it off the budget. The amendment also mandated reforms of the FAA’s personnel and procuremen­t systems. Unfortunat­ely, this amendment was rejected.

The AIRR Act would not fix the real problems plaguing the FAA. Congress should pass targeted solutions — not a risky privatizat­ion scheme that puts industry in charge of our aviation system and leaves consumers unprotecte­d.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States