Medals revisit Lynch dispute
Expert casts doubt on awards for rescue early in Iraq War
Lynch’s capture and rescue sparked controversy over the Iraq War.
Two Navy SEALs received Silver Star medals in secret after the rescue in April 2003 of Army Pvt. Jessica Lynch in Iraq, records obtained by USA TODAY show. An expert on military commendations called the citations the possible result of “a race to submit recommendations before the end of perceived combat operations.”
Lynch, whose capture and rescue sparked controversy about the Bush administration’s attempt to sell the war, was captured March 23, 2003, after her convoy got lost and was ambushed. Lynch was wounded and taken to a hospital in Nasiriyah, where she was rescued April 1.
Lynch suffered shattered bones and a damaged spine in the attack. Her captors sexually assaulted her. She was taken to a hospital in the town, then special operations forces whisked her away.
The tone of the citations differs from the majority of the more than 100 awards for secret valor that the Navy awarded to SEALs and Marines who fought fierce battles from Benghazi, Libya, to Ramadi, Iraq, to the mountains of Afghanistan since the 9/11 attacks, said Dwight Mears, a former West Point history professor who researched the military awards process. The names of the SEALs were redacted, and Lynch is not named. The citations refer to the date and place she was rescued.
Circumstances surrounding Lynch’s rescue, and whether the military trumped them up to bolster support for the war, prompted a Pentagon probe and congressional hearings.
Mears reviewed the citations and noted the contrast between those issued for Lynch’s rescue from an Iraqi hospital and those for later missions. The language in the operation to rescue Lynch was “a little over the top,” he said.
“These read very much like em-
bellished evaluation reports, not citations for gallantry in action,” Mears said. He said the citations happened early in the Iraq War when commanders felt it could end quickly and limit opportunities to recognize valor.
The citations for both men refer to their leadership of “a brilliant surgical air and ground assault to seize key areas of the hospital.”
One citation states, “The strategic significance of the first successful rescue of a U.S. POW is epic as it devastated Iraqi resolve and bolstered U.S. and international support for the campaign.”
That compares with the spare language used to describe the hostage rescue in 2012 of American doctor Dilip Joseph in Afghanistan, an operation that resulted in Navy SEAL Edward Byers being awarded the Medal of Honor. The citation for Byers reads, in part, “His bold and decisive actions under fire saved the lives of the hostage and several of his teammates.”
Another SEAL, who burst into the Taliban hide-out where Joseph was held, killed one of the captors, dragged out a mortally wounded comrade and returned to kill the last militant, “saved the lives of ... several of his teammates, enabling the strategic success of the mission,” according to his citation for the Silver Star.
The narratives in the Lynch rescue lack examples of such indi- vidual feats of heroism — the key factor in awarding the medals, Mears said.
Mears suggested that the timing of the awards, at the beginning of what was expected to be a short war, may have prompted senior leaders to push for them.
“This would potentially limit future opportunities for valor and associated recognition, perhaps spurring a race to submit recommendations before the end of perceived combat operations,” Mears said.
“Ironically, it’s a safe bet that the same special operators who received those awards under seemingly dubious circumstances likely went on to participate in other operations with far more potential for heroism.”
Lynch’s rescue was the subject of congressional hearings and an investigation by the Pentagon inspector general over concerns raised by members of Congress that it might have been staged for public relations purposes.
In testimony in 2007, Inspector General Thomas Gimble found that the rescue, which was filmed, was “a valid mission to recover a U.S. POW under combat conditions.”
The rescue operation involved Navy SEALs, Marines, Army Rangers and Air Force personnel. Gimble told Congress that the troops “received enemy fire from the hospital” and surrounding buildings but “neutralized” those forces without suffering casualties.