USA TODAY US Edition

INTEL PANEL CHAIR DOUBTS ‘AN ACTUAL TAP’ ON TRUMP TOWER

Senators threaten subpoenas, to stall a top Justice nominee

- Kevin Johnson and Herb Jackson Contributi­ng: Erin Kelly and David Jackson

With threats of WASHINGTON subpoenas and efforts to block a top Justice nominee, congressio­nal leaders are ramping up pressure on the Justice Department and FBI to acknowledg­e whether there is any informatio­n to support President Trump’s widely disputed claim that the Obama administra­tion wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the November election.

The Republican chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee told reporters Wednesday he has seen no evidence to support the claim.

“We don’t have any evidence that that took place,” California Rep. Devin Nunes said during a news conference at the Capitol. “I don’t think there was an actual tap of Trump Tower.”

Nunes said it was obvious that President Obama did not personally install listening devices in the building where Trump has offices and an apartment, so he said the committee has had to try to determine what the Trump did mean if his tweet could not be taken literally.

“If the White House or the president want to come out and clarify his statements more, it would probably, probably be helpful,” Nunes said.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, indicated separately Wednesday that he has bipartisan support to seek subpoenas if FBI Director James Comey does not respond to Trump’s wiretap claims and outline the status of the bureau’s ongoing investigat­ion into communicat­ions between Trump associates and Russian government officials.

“The bottom line is that a lot of Americans want to know what’s going on here,” Graham said at Senate hearing examining Russia’s efforts at underminin­g the U.S. political system and other democracie­s.

Graham said the FBI informed him that the bureau would be responding to lawmakers’ concerns in “a classified setting.”

If the request is not satisfied, Graham said there is Judiciary Committee support for issuing subpoenas to compel the informatio­n and to block the pending nomination of Rod Rosenstein, who is awaiting confirmati­on as the deputy attorney general.

Rosenstein’s position is especially crucial since Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from overseeing the federal Russia inquiry after it was disclosed that the former Alabama senator — and Trump campaign adviser — had met twice with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the course of the general election campaign. Sessions did not disclose the meetings during his January confirmati­on hearings.

Earlier this week, the Justice Department, facing a separate deadline from the House Intelligen­ce Committee to turn over informatio­n that might support Trump’s wiretap claims, asked for additional time to determine whether any informatio­n exists.

Nunes also said Wednesday he was demanding more answers from the intelligen­ce community about efforts they make to prevent the release of the names of Americans who are caught on tape during surveillan­ce of for- eign officials.

Comey and Adm. Michael Rogers, director of the National Security Agency, will testify at a public hearing the Intelligen­ce Committee will hold Monday, Nunes said. Another hearing will be held March 28 to hear from other witnesses.

Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who is the ranking member of the panel, said Comey would be asked publicly whether he has seen any evidence that substantia­tes Trump’s claim.

“It deeply concerns me that the president would make such an accusation without basis,” Schiff said.

He said it could be Trump was just reacting to something he saw on television, and the White House reaction has evolved over time.

“You can’t level an accusation of that type without retracting it or explaining just why it was done,” Schiff said. “I think there are, from a national security perspectiv­e, great concerns if the president is willing to state things like that without any basis, because the country needs to be able to rely on him, particular­ly if we have a crisis.

Trump sought to expand the definition of “wiretap” on Wednesday, telling a Fox News interviewe­r that it can mean a lot of different types of surveillan­ce.

“But wiretap covers a lot of different things,” Trump told Fox’s Tucker Carlson. “I think you’re going to find some very interestin­g items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks.”

Trump echoed his aides, who in recent days sought to expand the nature of Trump’s claims about Obama. While the president used the the term “wiretappin­g ” in his March 4 tweets, spokesman Sean Spicer and other aides have said he was referring to “surveillan­ce” in general.

 ?? AP ?? Rep. Adam Schiff
AP Rep. Adam Schiff

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States