USA TODAY US Edition

THE LEFT’S IMMIGRATIO­N DISTORTION­S

During the Obama years, progressiv­es and activists went off the deep end

- Saritha Prabhu

The immigratio­n issue amply demonstrat­es that when political pendulums swing too much to one side, they then swing back wildly and uncontroll­ably.

President Trump’s rhetoric and policies toward immigrants, legal and undocument­ed, have been harsh and have reflected the views of his base. But all this is partly — only partly — because during the Obama years, the immigratio­n rhetoric became quite loose.

It wasn’t Barack Obama’s fault. As deporter in chief, he deported record numbers of undocument­ed immigrants. But with eight years of a Democrat in the White House, progressiv­es and immigrant advocates became quite emboldened and gradually distorted the immigratio­n debate.

One thing they did successful­ly was blur the distinctio­n between legal and undocument­ed immigrants.

NOT GETTING IT

How often I’ve watched some progressiv­e or immigratio­n advocate talking about undocument­ed immigrants on TV, saying things such as, “America is a land of immigrants, so we should welcome all immigrants.”

To which I imagined rational, native-born Americans watching at home thinking, “But we are not against legal immigrants, just uncontroll­ed, unauthoriz­ed immigratio­n. Don’t you get it?”

The other way progressiv­es distorted the immigratio­n debate was to confuse the issue of whether immigratio­n is a right or a privilege.

Does the United States have a right, like any other country, to have a say in who, how many and what kind of immigrants (lowskilled, high-skilled) to allow into the country?

Do non-criminal, hardworkin­g, law-abiding people all over the world have a right to immigrate to this country? In a rational, commonsens­e world, the respective answers to the above questions are obviously “yes” and “no.” But somehow, during the past eight years the debate shifted so much that the answers seemed to become “no” and “yes.”

I don’t have any animus toward undocument­ed immigrants, mainly the impoverish­ed Mexicans and Central Americans who came across the border, escaping penury and violence. If I were in their shoes, I’d probably do the same.

But it is hard to have the same feelings toward the 40% of un- documented immigrants who came here in most cases on planes, willfully overstayed their tourist visas, then hunkered down and waited for the next round of legalizati­on.

And I have some animus toward our dysfunctio­nal immigratio­n system that punishes ( by deportatio­n) undocument­ed immigrants but lets off the hook their partners in lawbreakin­g: The businesses and individual­s who have used their cheap labor over the years.

Fact is, if E-Verify had been strictly enforced all these years, Trump’s proposed wall would have been rendered unnecessar­y.

EMOTIONAL STORIES

I’ve felt for some time that the left has gone off the deep end on the immigratio­n issue.

I agree with Nolan McCarty, a Princeton University political scientist who told The New York Times, “The Democrats have played immigratio­n badly. They have allowed their position to be associated with open borders and sanctuary cities. They have based their opposition to the immigratio­n restrictio­nists in terms of identity politics rather than the economic benefits of well-managed immigratio­n. This has caused them to be deaf to the concerns that many voters have about the effects of immigratio­n on wages and public services. While I do not think the evidence shows immigratio­n has these alleged harms, the Democrats have to do better than dismiss all opposition to immigratio­n as racism.”

Finally, a porous border threatens support for a welfare state. That is something Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is for humane but controlled immigratio­n, understood.

Excessive emotionali­sm isn’t good in any debate, much less in the immigratio­n debate. Some emotionali­sm is necessary because Americans need to see that the undocument­ed immigrants are real people with families that stand to be disrupted by Trump’s draconian policies (which I don’t support).

But we also need to remember that for every emotional story involving undocument­ed immigrants, there are equally emotional stories about legal immigrants waiting for years, jumping through bureaucrat­ic hoops to get themselves and their spouses here from their native countries.

The left and the mainstream news media need to tell these stories, too.

Saritha Prabhu is a columnist for The (Nashville) Tennessean, where this piece first appeared.

 ?? SPENCER PLATT, GETTY IMAGES ??
SPENCER PLATT, GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States