USA TODAY US Edition

Our view: The contemptib­le effort to discredit Mueller

-

When Robert Mueller was appointed in May to oversee the investigat­ion into possible Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 campaign, he was universall­y praised as the perfect choice. Former House speaker Newt Gingrich, a vocal supporter of President Trump, tweeted that Mueller’s “reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity.”

And so it is. Amid the contemptib­le efforts to discredit Mueller’s inquiry, let’s pause for a moment to remember who he is: A Republican. A Marine Corps veteran who earned a Bronze Star for valor and Purple Heart for a gunshot wound to his thigh in Vietnam. A longtime federal prosecutor before President George W. Bush nominated him to direct the FBI in 2001 and the Senate unanimousl­y confirmed him.

Mueller took office a week before Sept. 11 and led the bureau during the height of the war on terrorism, his agents tirelessly circumvent­ing additional attacks. Mueller was so highly respected that he was asked to stay on under President Obama.

Yet as the Russia investigat­ion gathered steam with charges brought against four former Trump campaign officials in recent months, a coterie of Republican congressme­n, joined by commentato­rs on Fox News and other Trump-friendly media outlets, have started calling for Mueller’s head. Rarely has the American public been suddenly asked to revile a public figure once so widely revered.

“We are at risk of a coup d’etat in this country,” Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., warned ominously on the House floor in November, using the sort of irresponsi­ble language that could well inspire homegrown terrorists.

The special counsel’s ostensible crime? Members of his staff — like every other American — hold political views in their private lives. In fact, nothing in the FBI code of ethics requires agents to be cleansed of political leanings. The fair investigat­ion of political figures they might personally dislike is nothing new. Just the same, when Mueller learned last summer that one of his investigat­ors had tweeted to another FBI employee that Trump is an “idiot,” the investigat­or was immediatel­y reassigned.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is looking into any issue of bias at the FBI and will produce a report in the months ahead. In the meantime, there is zero evidence that Mueller has done anything wrong and every indication he is making headway on foreign intrusion into American elections.

The factions calling the special counsel’s fairness into question are laying the groundwork for either underminin­g Mueller’s conclusion­s or firing him. To pre-empt his possible removal, Congress should promptly pass bipartisan legislatio­n to provide greater protection­s for the special counsel.

Where logic falls away amid the odious campaign to tarnish Mueller and his investigat­ors — bolstered Tuesday by Trump’s latest “FBI TAINTED” tweet — is with the prospect that the president might well be innocent.

If the Russia story is truly “fake news” and a “witch hunt,” as the president and his minions insist, why are they so worried about what Mueller’s inquiry might reveal?

 ??  ?? Robert Mueller in 2013 J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE, AP
Robert Mueller in 2013 J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE, AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States