U.S. kids will live better than parents, Buffett says
But nation must close divide between rich, poor
It may be freezing outside, but a dose of spring-like optimism will emanate from newsstands this week as business magnate Warren Buffett assures readers that American children will have a better standard of living than their parents.
The essay by Buffet for Time magazine’s Jan. 5 issue comes as Millennials are projected to be the first generation in U.S. history to do worse financially than their moms and dads.
“I have good news,” Buffett, 87, writes. “First, most American children are going to live far better than their parents did. Second, large gains in the living standards of Americans will continue for many generations to come.”
But Buffett warns that happy outcome hinges on the nation closing the divide between rich and poor.
His essay highlights a special Time issue, titled “The Optimists,” guestedited by philanthropist and Microsoft founder Bill Gates. In an editor’s letter, Gates ticks off a litany of global ills, including last year’s devastating North American hurricanes, mass shootings, the U.S. nuclear standoff with North Korea and bloody civil wars in Syria and Yemen.
But he adds, “On the whole, the world is getting better.” He points to heartening successes, such as sharp declines in the portion of the global population living in extreme poverty and the number of children dying before their 5th birthday. Featured on the cover is 5-year-old Ethiopian Nohamad Nasir, whom Gates met less than a month after he was born.
Other contributors include U2 lead singer Bono on why men must fight for women and girls; director Ava DuVernay on what gives her hope; Congressman John Lewis, D-Ga., on why getting into trouble is necessary to make change; and Trevor Noah, host of The Daily Show, on Millennials as a hopeful generation.
But Buffett touches on perhaps the biggest running angst for Americans — the idea that “our economic machine is sputtering,” exemplified by growth in gross domestic product that has been mired at about 2% a year since the Great Recession ended in 2009.
Buffett writes that with U.S. population growth slowing, smaller economic gains are needed. The population, he says, is expected to increase about 0.8% a year after factoring in births, deaths and immigration. Under that scenario,
2% annual increases in inflation-adjusted GDP would deliver 1.2% growth in per capita (or per person) GDP. In 25 years, that growth level would lift current GDP of $59,000 per capita to
$79,000. “This $20,000 increase guarantees a far better life for our children,” Buffett writes.
Buffett also tries to allay fears that innovation and productivity will mean lost jobs, a seeming nod to advances such as robots and artificial intelligence. In 1776, when the nation was founded, 80% of workers had jobs on farms, he says, but that figure has dwindled to just 2% today because of tractors, cotton gins and other inventions. If that kind of upheaval were foreseen, Americans would have wondered how all the unemployed farmers could find work, Buffett writes. But he says farming’s productivity gains “freed nearly
80% of the nation’s workforce to redeploy their efforts into new industries that have changed our way of life.”
Increases in productivity, or worker output, have vastly raised living standards, Buffett adds, noting that uppermiddle-class Americans today enjoy travel, entertainment, medicine and education options unavailable to John D. Rockefeller, the wealthiest American when Buffett was born in 1930.
Americans, he says, will similarly “benefit from far more and better ‘stuff ’ in the future. The challenge will be to have this bounty deliver a better life to the disrupted as well as to the disruptors.”