USA TODAY US Edition

Tie could complicate things down road for Pack

- Pete Dougherty

GREEN BAY, Wis. – This is one that could come back to bite the Packers in December.

No, they didn’t lose to the Vikings on Sunday. But they had too many chances to put the game away to feel even OK about a 29-29 tie.

What should have been a big earlyseaso­n win against their main NFC North Division rival with Aaron Rodgers playing one-legged, instead turned into a big nothing burger.

“Close to an ‘L’ ” is how Rodgers described it. “Doesn’t feel great.”

Of course Minnesota can say it should have won, too. Kicker Daniel Carlson missed a chip-shot 35-yard field goal attempt as time ran out in overtime. That blew the game, too.

But the Packers led pretty much the entire game and had several chances to win this one before Carlson’s miss, so whatever relief they felt walking off Lambeau Field, there’s no getting around that they should have been celebratin­g a 2-0 start and a winning effort by their injured quarterbac­k against what figures to be one of the best defenses in the NFL.

This league is all about offense, and when you get the chance to put a game away with points, you have to do it. Yet the Packers and Rodgers had four great chances in the final 3½ minutes and overtime and failed to come through.

Twice they had the ball deep in Minnesota territory with the chance to put the game out of reach with a touchdown and couldn’t get in the end zone. On the first, Rodgers had to throw the ball away on 3rd-and-6 because of pressure from defensive linemen Everson Griffen and Sheldon Richardson. On the second, a gifted tipped-ball intercepti­on by Ha Ha Clinton-Dix that gave them the ball on Minnesota’s 13, the Packers went three-and-out with a delay-of-game penalty mixed in.

Then with no timeouts and 31 seconds left in regulation, Rodgers moved the Packers into field goal range, only to have Mason Crosby miss from 52 yards.

And in overtime, Rodgers short-circuited with the Packers on the cusp of Crosby’s range for the winning field goal. Rodgers lost 1 yard when he botched the keep and fumbled on a run-pass option, then held the ball against a blitz and was sacked for a 7yard loss on third down.

“I’m definitely (running for) a first down and we’re inside 50-yard field goal range,” Rodgers said of his fumble.

Then there’s also the big unnecessar­y roughness against Clay Matthews in the final 2 minutes that I’m sure has Packers fans apoplectic. It wiped out a game-clinching intercepti­on and kept alive Kirk Cousins to take the Vikings to the tying score. Referee Tony Corrente said after the game that he penalized Matthews because he “lifted (Cousins) up and drove him into the ground.”

That call looked shaky on replay, and no question, it was a big call. But really, the Packers can’t squawk too much or say it cost them the game. They still had their chances to get a stop or prevent the two-point conversati­on and didn’t come through.

And let’s face it, even if erring on the side of protecting the passer hurt them in this instance, in the long run it works very much in their favor. Rodgers is going to take fewer hard hits, which should help him play both longer and healthier. And by the way, the emphasis for protecting quarterbac­ks is there in large part because of the shot he took from Anthony Barr last year that broke his collarbone.

The thing the Packers can feel best about is that Rodgers appears to have come out of the game no worse for having played one week after injuring his left knee. There really was doubt early in the week whether he’d play because of stiffness and soreness in the knee, but by the time he practiced Saturday, it was clear to him and the team he would be able to play.

There were conflictin­g national reports about the exact nature of the injury — one said it was cartilage damage but no sprained ligaments, the other said it was a deep bone bruise and ligament strain. Rodgers declined to comment after the game, so it’s still not clear what the injury is.

But he appeared to come out without overtly aggravatin­g the injury on any of the several hits he took. He also showed a little more mobility than he had last week after returning from the injury in the second half against Chicago. He answered a big question in the first half when he scrambled for a first down, and the fact that he wanted to keep the ball on the run-pass option (RPO) suggested that while he clearly was limited, he wasn’t feeling that bad in the heat of battle.

There’s no reason to think he won’t be able to keep playing and continue getting healthier week after week, though it could be a long couple of months for him.

“It’s the type of thing that could linger, but we’ll see,” Rodgers said.

But if Rodgers playing is reason for the Packers to feel good about the rest of the season, they still blew a great chance to win this one. A tie is better than losing, but there were important tiebreaker implicatio­ns at stake, and the Packers failed to seize them.

A win would have ensured they could do no worse than split with the Vikings if they tie for the division crown and put them in position for a huge sweep. It also would have given them a 2-0 record in the division, which is the second tiebreaker.

All in all, there was a big win for the taking in tough circumstan­ces, and the Packers didn’t take it.

“We’re sitting up here 1-0-1,” Rodgers said. “It doesn’t sound that great.”

 ?? BENNY SIEU/USA TODAY SPORTS ?? Vikings wide receiver Stefon Diggs catches a touchdown pass in the fourth quarter against Packers cornerback Davon House.
BENNY SIEU/USA TODAY SPORTS Vikings wide receiver Stefon Diggs catches a touchdown pass in the fourth quarter against Packers cornerback Davon House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States