USA TODAY US Edition

‘Romanoffs’ anthology is sparkly, indulgent mess

- Kelly Lawler

“Mad Men” this is not. AMC’s drama about Madison Avenue ad executives was a masterful, exquisitel­y crafted period piece that still managed to touch on the way we live now, with impeccable performanc­es and deep emotional stakes.

But “Mad Men” creator Matthew Weiner’s new Amazon anthology series “The Romanoffs” (first two episodes streaming Friday, then weekly; ★g☆☆) is none of those things. Instead, it’s a prime example of “prestige TV” run amok: all glitz, A-list stars and exotic locations with nothing substantiv­e underneath.

Hacky, navel-gazing and self-aggrandizi­ng, “Romanoffs” is meant to be a global and generation­al collection of eight stories that interconne­ct, however distantly or imagined, to the Russian royal family that was murdered by the Bolsheviks in the Russian Revolution. Its first two episodes made available for review include moments of entertainm­ent, beautiful landscapes and clever acting, but they are overrun by nonsensica­l plotting and rubbish dialogue.

Like Netflix’s sci-fi “Black Mirror,” “Romanoffs” is an anthology series with different casts and a different story in each episode. The first, “The Violet Hour,” follows an elderly descendant of the Romanoffs, Anushka (Marthe Keller), living in Paris and cared for by her American nephew Greg (Aaron Eckhart), who mostly wants to inherit her fancy apartment. In the second, “The Royal We,” Corey Stoll plays Michael Romanoff, a selfish man in a midlife crisis who abandons his wife, Shelly (Kerry Bishe).

“The Violet Hour” starts off slowly but eventually becomes a touching story about Anushka and her new Muslim caretaker, Hajar (Ines Melab), a relationsh­ip that starts out confrontat­ional (mostly because of Anushka’s racism) but ends up remarkably tender. It might have been really decent if not for an aggressive­ly cheesy twist.

“Royal We” is more of a train wreck, equal parts boring and repulsive, a waste of its talented stars. Michael, who is selfish and lazy, hates his wife but bottles it up. Rather than go on a cruise with her, he manipulate­s his way onto a jury and starts relentless­ly pursuing a juror (Janet Montgomery).

If Michael wasn’t such a familiar man-child type, and the first hour of the story wasn’t so incredibly dull, the episode would tell a decent story about Shelly. But a late twist is foolish, and the final shots that are meant to convey triumph only telegraph sadness.

There is excitement and splendor in a series set in so many countries. Shots of nighttime in Paris are beautiful, and Stoll (“Ant-Man”) knows how to play a jerk. But those bits and pieces aren’t enough to sustain a show as woefully overdone as “Romanoffs.”

Streaming sites offer creators free reign, but time and again the final product reminds us why having editors and constraint­s is sometimes exactly what makes great art click.

 ?? JAN THIJS/AMAZON ?? An episode of “The Romanoffs” is a waste of Kerry Bishe.
JAN THIJS/AMAZON An episode of “The Romanoffs” is a waste of Kerry Bishe.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States