USA TODAY US Edition

Unsightly doubts raise a blemish on ‘clean’ cosmetics

Goop and others profit by shunning makeup chemicals, but experts question their claims

- Cara Kelly and Jayne O’Donnell

The Food and Drug Administra­tion oversees cosmetics, which legally must be safe for consumers to use as directed and properly labeled. Unlike food and drugs, they do not need FDA approval before going to market.

Skincare sets wrapped in millennial pink and eco-green fill Instagram ads this season. With their pore-refining promises, these would-be stocking-stuffers draw attention to “toxic chemicals” canceled by clean-living proponents in the past few years. Face masks with parabens? Don’t even think about it, the gospel of Goop preaches. Body lotions with mineral oils? Definitely not on Beauty-counter’s “nice” list. Trying to understand the rationale behind these decrees can be more complicate­d than applying liquid eyeliner in an airplane bathroom.

Experts and industry veterans said the muddy reality of the billion-dollar clean beauty movement – which drove a 27 percent increase in skin care alone this year – is that terms such as “natural” and “organic” are essentiall­y meaningles­s and unregulate­d, and the muchhyped health risks of several chemical ingredient­s are based on questionab­le data.

“There is kind of a chemophobi­a in the U.S. – if it’s a chemical, a man-made chemical, it must be bad,” said Curtis Klaassen, former president of the Society of Toxicology and chair of Pharmacolo­gy, Toxicology and Therapeuti­cs at the Kansas University Medical Center.

The Environmen­tal Working

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ??
GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States