Fed cuts rates for first time since 2008
Possible recession due to global issues spur move
WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve gave the U.S. economy a rare immunization shot Wednesday as it sought to extend a record 10-year-old expansion that faces mounting risks.
Despite a generally healthy economy, the Fed cut its key short-term interest rate for the first time in more than a decade in a bid to head off a possible recession spurred by global troubles and trade tensions.
As expected, the Fed lowered its federal funds rate by a quarter-percentage point to a range of 2% to 2.25%. The move is likely to ripple through the economy and financial system, nudging down rates for credit cards, home equity lines and auto loans and theoretically sparking more economic activity. While the rate cut should aid borrowers, it will frustrate savers who were just starting to benefit from higher bank account yields.
Yet it reverses just a fraction of the nine rate hikes the Fed enacted from late 2015 to late 2018 to prevent an eventual inflation run-up and bring borrowing costs back to normal – years after the Great Recession of 2007-09.
“In light of the implications of global developments for the economic outlook as well as muted inflation pressures, the (Fed’s policymaking committee) decided to lower” its key rate to a range of 2% to 2.25%,” the Fed said in a statement after a two-day meeting.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell told re
porters he didn’t see Wednesday’s move as the start of a lengthy rate-cut cycle. “That’s not what we’re seeing now,” he said.
But he didn’t rule out further decreases, saying it would depend on global growth, trade tensions and low inflation. “We see (these risks) as threats to the favorable outlook,” he said.
Wall Street reacted with disappointment. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 334 points, or 1.2%, at 26,864. The yield on the 10-year Treasury dropped to 2.02%.
“Markets were expecting an insurance cut. Instead, they got a confusing cut,” said Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group in Richmond, Virginia.
“Chairman Powell followed through with a (quarter-point) cut, but flipflopped on what markets should expect with regard to future monetary policy,” Cox continued. “Is this a mid-cycle cut or isn’t it?”
The central bank also agreed to end a campaign to shrink its $3.8 trillion balance sheet two months earlier than anticipated in a move that should hold down long-term rates.
More cuts may be on the way. Before the Fed action, Fed fund futures markets priced in up to three rate decreases this year and four within 12 months. But the Fed may be taking a wait-and-see approach. As it weighs future rate decisions, it said “it will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook and will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion.”
In its June statement, the Fed said it will “closely monitor” developments. The new language suggests “slightly less concern about downside risks” to the Fed’s outlook, IHS Markit wrote in a note to clients.
Despite a 3.7% unemployment rate and economic growth averaging a solid 2.6% the first half of the year, inflation has remained stubbornly below the Fed’s annual 2% target. Meanwhile, sluggish growth in Europe and China has hobbled U.S. exports, and President Donald Trump’s trade war with China has damped business confidence and investment.
The upshot is a split-screen economy, with strong job gains and consumer spending, but lackluster manufacturing output and business outlays threatening to undermine growth. Household consumption makes up about 70% of economic activity.
As a result, the Fed’s action Wednesday is viewed as an unusual “insurance cut,” enacted even though the economy remains sturdy in an effort to stave off a potential downturn. The thinking is that the Fed’s key rate is still historically low and so there’s little room to trim rates to spur growth in case of recession.
But economists pointedly disagree about what the Fed should be doing. Some, like those at Morgan Stanley, predicted the Fed would lower its rate by half a percentage point Wednesday to provide enough insurance against an economic slide. By cutting a quarter point, the Fed would be “wasting a scarce and valuable … bullet” in its arsenal, the research firm wrote to clients.
Earlier this week, Trump criticized the Fed’s expected quarter-point move, tweeting that it “will do very little” compared to anticipated rate cuts by policymakers in Europe and China.
Trump has been blasting Fed rate hikes or exhorting it to lower rates the past year, breaking with a long tradition of presidents steering clear of such comments to preserve the agency’s independence.
Yet RBC Capital Markets, citing a lack of “economic distress,” decried any rate cut. “You are giving away your ammunition today,” the firm wrote. That armament could be needed if the economy heads south by next year, as many economists predict.
Kansas City Fed President Esther George and Boston Fed chief Eric Rosengren dissented, preferring to keep rates unchanged.
The Fed said “economic activity has been rising at a moderate rate.” While “household spending has picked up from earlier in the year, growth of business fixed investment has been soft.”
The economy grew at a respectable 2.1% annual rate in the second quarter following strong gains of 3.1% early in the year and 2.9% in 2018. Strong consumer spending has offset weak business investment manufacturing.
Growth is likely to slow to 2% the second half of the year, well below the 3% or better pace that Trump has promised.