USA TODAY US Edition

Three trends that will explode in the 2020s

Two will even actually make you happy

- Glenn Harlan Reynolds Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor and the author of “The New School: How the Informatio­n Age Will Save American Education from Itself,” is a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributo­rs.

We’re passing from one decade to another with surprising­ly little fanfare. (It only recently hit me that one day we’ll be referring to the coming decade by saying things like, “It was back in the ’20s,” the way my grandmothe­r talked about her childhood.) I want to mark this one by pointing out three trends from the 2010s that weren’t exactly overlooked at the time but that I think will be much bigger in the next decade. Here they are:

❚ The national debt. It’s not that the problem isn’t noticed — a recent Pew Research Center poll found that 53% of people view the federal deficit and thus the debt as a serious problem, significan­tly outweighin­g other more-discussed issues such as climate change, terrorism or racism.

Right now, yearly deficits are going up, but the debt — essentiall­y the sum of all previous deficits — is skyrocketi­ng. It has done that for a decade, except for a couple of years when it briefly leveled off due to the influence of the Tea Party movement. I’m sorry to say I’ve kind of given up talking about it because nobody seems to care, and I’m afraid the politician­s in both parties will kick the can down the road until something really drastic happens.

I’m guessing this something might happen in the next decade. The rule is something that can’t go on forever, won’t, but there’s no guarantee as to when it will stop. I feel safe in predicting, though, that it won’t stop due to a sudden infusion of virtue and self-control into our political class.

❚ Hydraulic fracturing. Writing about the past 10 years of war in Afghanista­n, Richard Fernandez observes: “If the War on Terror seems largely won today, or at least less desperate than September 2001, it is because radical Islam has discredite­d itself, the strongmen of the Middle East have self-immolated ... through their own dysfunctio­n, and entreprene­urs have eased American dependence on foreign oil through fracking and other innovation­s.” Of those three factors, the last is probably the most important.

U.S. foreign policy revolved around making sure that oil flowed from the Middle East. Even though the United States became a net petroleum exporter in September, we still import some oil from the region (energy markets are complex), but now that we’re the world’s biggest oil producer, we’re vastly less dependent than we used to be. And American presidents, whether President Donald Trump or a successor, will always have the ability to boost production dramatical­ly by opening up federal land or offshore areas.

This is valuable both as an alternativ­e and as a threat.

The upshot is that our politics and strategies will depend much, much less on the problems and concerns of backward Middle Eastern nations.

It has also drasticall­y weakened the position of Russian President Vladimir Putin because it makes Russia’s oil output — on which he depends for economic and political leverage — much less significan­t.

This is a huge achievemen­t that has gotten surprising­ly little attention. (And why do some of the Democrats running for president want to ban fracking and throw that advantage away? That’s a whole 'nother column.)

❚ Space travel. When I was a kid, I thought I’d live to be a tourist on the moon. That’s looking doubtful now. But after five decades of post-Apollo NASA stagnation, private companies like Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin are making serious strides. I predict that we’ll see multiple private missions to the moon, and quite possibly even to Mars, before the next decade is out.

More important, I expect that advanced technologi­es and a commercial rather than big-government approach to space activity will lead to much lower costs for doing things in space. Already, SpaceX can launch a kilogram to orbit for $2,720 — the space shuttle’s cost per kilogram was $54,500 per kilogram, meaning that SpaceX is doing it for roughly 1/20 the cost.

As we’ve learned from the computer revolution, when things get a lot cheaper, people find all sorts of new uses for them. The same will be true in space, and it will start to happen in a big way over the next decade.

These are my prediction­s, and two out of three of them are even cheerful. As for the debt, well, some left-leaning economists are pushing a school of thought called Modern Monetary Theory that purports to show debt doesn’t matter. I have serious doubts about this — the “this time is different” arguments usually don’t turn out well — but hey, maybe they’ll turn out to be right.

If so, it’s all cheerful. Either way, happy 2020!

 ?? MARK LENNIHAN/AP ?? New Year’s Eve at the New York Stock Exchange.
MARK LENNIHAN/AP New Year’s Eve at the New York Stock Exchange.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States