USA TODAY US Edition

Wolken: Impact if tennis event canceled.

- Dan Wolken Columnist USA TODAY

For two weeks every summer, the manicured courts of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club are ubiquitous on television every morning for American sports fans. Even if you don’t particular­ly care about tennis or have just glanced at the tournament in passing on ESPN, there’s only one place in the world that looks like Wimbledon.

But what makes that particular event such a standout on the sports calendar is also what makes it extremely difficult to move – and why it might end up being canceled altogether this week due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Wimbledon’s courts are built from perennial ryegrass cut to 8 millimeter­s that, according to the club, requires 13 days of hard and dry soil underneath to play properly without incurring any damage. But even before that, it takes 15 months for the courts to be seeded and cut and installed to perfection. And given the weather patterns in England, the season to have a championsh­ip-quality grass court is relatively short, with members being able to play the regular courts from May to September.

It is truly a living, breathing, fragile surface, and the difficulty of maintainin­g it explains why grass-court tennis is pretty much a relic of the past. Unlike the bygone era of tennis when three of the four Grand Slam tournament­s were played on grass, these days the grass season lasts only a month.

Thus, it is completely understand­able that Wimbledon announced last Wednesday an emergency meeting this week to determine the fate of the tournament.

According to the All England Club, “The very short window available to us to stage The Championsh­ips due to the nature of our surface suggests that postponeme­nt is not without significan­t risk and difficulty. Playing behind closed doors has been formally ruled out.”

That means the tournament will start as scheduled on June 29 with fans in attendance, be delayed no more than a few weeks or not played at all.

Unlike the French Open, which made a unilateral decision to move to a Sept. 20 start, Wimbledon just doesn’t have much wiggle room. If the tournament is canceled, the implicatio­ns are huge, particular­ly for the two most important figures in the sport.

Roger Federer and Serena Williams, who were born about six weeks apart, will both turn 39 this year. Even at this advanced stage of their careers, they are both in a Grand Slam race without much time remaining.

Federer, who has the men’s record of 20 Slam titles, is just one ahead of Rafael Nadal and three ahead of Novak Djokovic. Williams has 23, and the quest to surpass Margaret Court’s 24 borders on obsession.

For both of them, Wimbledon is by far the best chance to add one more Grand Slam title at this point.

Federer has won it eight times and lost arguably the most heartbreak­ing match of his career in last year’s final to Djokovic, showing he is still a real threat on grass.

Williams has seven Wimbledon titles and lost the last two finals after returning to the sport from childbirth.

Federer and Williams are both alltime champions and still among the best players in the world, but they are diminished athletes at this stage. The quirky Wimbledon grass, which produces shorter points and gives an advantage to dominant servers (which both Federer and Williams are), helps restore some of what age has taken away from them.

So from that perspectiv­e, striking this particular Wimbledon from the calendar potentiall­y alters the history of the sport. While cancellati­on of a Grand Slam would be big any year, losing a Wimbledon so close to the end of these two careers would be a gut-wrenching thing to accept.

There are, of course, bigger problems right now. People are dying from COVID-19 and the world is basically paralyzed, with no defined end to the suffering.

If the tennis season didn’t resume the rest of this year, or if Federer and Williams never played again, they’d be able to walk away from the sport having accomplish­ed more than anyone else in the Open Era. By contrast to what’s going on in England and Europe and everywhere else right now, losing a final or shutting down a tennis tournament isn’t such a big deal.

But unlike a lot of other tournament­s and sporting events around the globe that are claiming new space on the calendar, Wimbledon is pretty much in an all-or-nothing position.

Unfortunat­ely for tennis fans, and particular­ly anyone who wants to see Federer and Williams have one more great chance to win it, time isn’t on their side.

 ?? SUSAN MULLANE/USA TODAY SPORTS ?? Of Roger Federer’s 20 Grand Slam tournament titles, eight have come at Wimbledon, including his most recent in 2017.
SUSAN MULLANE/USA TODAY SPORTS Of Roger Federer’s 20 Grand Slam tournament titles, eight have come at Wimbledon, including his most recent in 2017.
 ?? SUSAN MULLANE/USA TODAY SPORTS ?? Serena Williams, shown at Wimbledon last year, counts seven of those grass-court titles among her 23 Grand Slams.
SUSAN MULLANE/USA TODAY SPORTS Serena Williams, shown at Wimbledon last year, counts seven of those grass-court titles among her 23 Grand Slams.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States