USA TODAY US Edition

Who will be liable if workers get sick as economy reopens?

Employees must prove they got virus at work

-

A handful of states are reopening for business following coronaviru­striggered lockdowns, raising two compelling questions: Must employers ensure the workplace is safe? And will they be held liable if employees contract the virus?

The short answer is that while health care providers must follow federal safety guidelines to guard against contagion, other businesses are not obligated to do so, leaving it to states and localities to set standards, experts say. And sick employees who seek damages, typically through worker’s compensati­on, must prove that they contracted the virus at work – an especially thorny challenge.

“It’s often an uphill battle,” for workers, says Jonathan Segal, an employment lawyer who represents companies at Duane Morris law firm in Philadelph­ia.

States such as Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee and Alaska have at least partly lifted shutdown orders in recent days. In Georgia, gyms, bowling alleys, barbers and massage therapists were allowed to open Friday and restaurant­s could open Monday.

The Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion requires employers to establish a workplace that’s “free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm” to employees. To meet that standard, OSHA is advising businesses to follow the Centers for Disease Control

Paul Davidson and Nicholas Wu

and Prevention guidelines, including instructin­g employees to keep six feet away from co-workers or customers, taking temperatur­es, disinfecti­ng surfaces, and providing face masks, hand sanitizers and barriers when appropriat­e.

“We’re seeing employers do that to mitigate that risk,” says Christina Meddin, a labor lawyer at Seyfarth Shaw in Atlanta who is advising business clients to follow the guidelines.

The more safeguards a company adopts, “the better your argument is going to be” if there’s a challenge by OSHA or a lawsuit, says Jennifer Scharf, a health law attorney at the Coppola Firm in Amherst, New York.

Here’s the rub: OSHA is enforcing the CDC guidelines and conducting inspection­s in response to deaths in hospitals but not in other cases, according to an OSHA memo released April 13 and Debbie Berkowitz, Worker Safety and Health program director for the National Employment Law Project, a worker advocacy group. About 4,000 coronaviru­s-related complaints have been filed against employers that fail to provide safe workplaces but the agency has not issued any citations or fines, Berkowitz says. Instead, she says, OSHA is pointing businesses to voluntary guidelines.

“OSHA is not enforcing anything,” says Berkowitz, former OSHA senior policy adviser during the Obama administra­tion. “OSHA does not have the backs of workers … It’s a travesty.”

In response to the criticism, the Labor Department, which includes OSHA, said in a statement: “OSHA will consult CDC guidelines and its own guidance” as it determines whether a workplace is “free from recognized hazards.”

“Where OSHA finds a violation, a citation will be issued and a civil monetary penalty imposed.”

Some states take the lead

Some states are creating their own safeguards. Besides mandating social distancing and other standards, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’s executive order requires restaurant employees to wear face coverings. But most other businesses must provide personal protective equipment only “as available and appropriat­e to the function and location of the worker within the business.” Berkowitz says that’s not enough, noting “there is significan­t risk of transmissi­on of COVID-19 from infected individual­s who are asymptomat­ic and presymptom­atic.”

Many Georgia businesses, worried about the safety of employees and customers, as well as any legal liability, are choosing to remain largely shuttered. Suzanne Vizethann, the chef and owner of Buttermilk Kitchen in Chastain, is providing curbside pickup, e-commerce and catering services but doesn’t plan to reopen her 85-seat dining room for at least a couple of months.

“We don’t feel comfortabl­e that this thing is behind us,” she says. “We’re not going to do anything that puts (employees) in harm’s way. That could be a big liability if somebody gets sick and their family gets sick.” She adds that it’s much easier to monitor social distancing between employees with the restaurant’s current limited services.

Other businesses in Georgia are reopening but taking pains to follow all the state’s guidelines – and more. Lester Crowell, owner of Three-13 Salon, Spa & Boutique in Marietta, reopened Friday and is requiring all hairstylis­ts and technician­s to wear face coverings and gloves.

“I’m anxious,” Crowell says. “It’s a hard decision to make but we are a business and we’re available to be open . But he added, “We are going above and beyond” the guidelines.

Workers face hurdles proving liability

Nationwide, employees – or their families – can seek monetary damages if workers get sick or die. But in most states, employees who can file a claim through workers’ compensati­on, a type of insurance, must take that route and relinquish the right to sue, lawyers say. Meanwhile, winning such a claim can be difficult, with workers having to prove they contracted coronaviru­s on the job – a high bar during a pandemic.

“Even though it’s recognized that some groups of workers are at elevated risk of catching a virus, there’s still that reality that they may be catching it outside of work,” says John Ruser, CEO of the Workers Compensati­on Research Institute, an independen­t group that analyzes workers compensati­on issues. “The burden of proof would be pretty heavy for them to show that it was work-related.”

Meanwhile, a handful of states, including Illinois and Kentucky, have started to shift the burden of proof from the worker to the employer. Under an order from Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, essential workers at businesses such as grocery and hardware stores would have “the presumptio­n that the workers that are essential caught the disease at work.” The company would then have to demonstrat­e otherwise.

Late last week, however, a county judge issued a temporary restrainin­g order blocking the rule after business groups filed a lawsuit opposing it.

Wave of lawsuits?

Some workers, and their advocates, are heading to court in the leading edge of what could be a wave of lawsuits stemming from the pandemic.

In Illinois, the family of a Walmart worker who died of coronaviru­s sued the retailer in early April, alleging the company didn’t do enough to protect its workers from the disease.

In a statement, Walmart spokespers­on Randy Hargrove told USA TODAY the store in Evergreen Park, Illinois, where the worker had been employed had passed third-party environmen­tal and health inspection­s.

And in Missouri, a nonprofit workers group sued Smithfield Foods in federal court on behalf of its workers after a coronaviru­s outbreak at a Smithfield plant in Milan sickened several employees. The suit alleges Smithfield workers were forced to work without adequate protective equipment, “shoulder to shoulder,” were not given opportunit­ies to wash their hands, and were discourage­d from taking sick leave and given bonuses for working while sick.

Smithfield did not return a call seeking comment.

Businesses seek to limit liability

Worried about such lawsuits and a hodgepodge of state laws, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is among several business groups asking Congress to set a federal standard that limits liability for employers who follow CDC guidelines.

“We’re looking for a narrowly tailored policy that will give employers the confidence to reopen their businesses without there being a cloud of liability,” says Harold Kim, president of the chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform.

 ?? WALMART ?? A Walmart employee wearing a mask and plastic gloves.
WALMART A Walmart employee wearing a mask and plastic gloves.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States