USA TODAY US Edition

House repeals resolution for ‘blank check’ to war

It paved way for Iraq invasion by US military

- Deirdre Shesgreen and Ledyard King

The 2002 measure paved the way for the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Republican­s argue it’s still needed to protect U.S. interests.

WASHINGTON – The House voted Thursday to repeal the nearly 2-decadeold war resolution that paved the way for the U.S. military invasion of Iraq, which proponents said marked a first step toward halting America’s “forever wars.”

The House has approved similar measures before, but they died in the Senate when Republican­s were in power. This time is different: The Senate’s Democratic leadership has vowed to take up the measure, and the White House also has endorsed it.

“The Iraq War has been over for nearly a decade,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Wednesday in announcing his support for the repeal.

Schumer and other proponents argued the 2002 measure is irrelevant, unnecessar­y and subject to abuse.

In Thursday’s debate, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the “outdated” authorizat­ion has been used “as a blank check to conduct unrelated military operations,” and leaving it on the books risks further abuse.

Republican­s argued the 2002 measure was still vital to U.S. national security, noting that Iranian-backed militias are now operating in Iraq.

“The murderous Iranian regime has armed proxy organizati­ons to kill Americans and innocent Iraqis,” said Alabama Rep. Mike Rogers, top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee. “This is a bad deal for our national security and the safety of American servicemem­bers overseas.”

Rogers and other GOP lawmakers said Congress should update the 2002 authorizat­ion, not repeal it.

The Trump administra­tion cited the 2002 Iraq resolution in its legal justificat­ion for the U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani. Trump officials said the strike against Soleimani – which occurred in Iraq – was a “defensive action” because the Iranian general was plotting attacks on American diplomats and service members.

But the move infuriated Iraqi leaders who cited it as a breach of their country’s sovereignt­y.

And in the U.S., legal and military experts said there was “no plausible argument” that the 2002 Iraq measure gave the White House legal authority to kill Soleimani.

The 2002 measure authorized thenPresid­ent George W. Bush to “use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriat­e in order to … defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq.”

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., chief sponsor of a Senate bill to repeal the Iraq measure, said he couldn’t remember the last time Congress repealed a war authorizat­ion. Kaine’s co-sponsor is Republican Sen. Todd Young of Indiana.

The 2002 Iraq War resolution has long been controvers­ial because the Bush administra­tion argued at the time that Hussein’s regime was hiding weapons of mass destructio­n, an assertion that turned out to be wrong.

And while many hailed the demise of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, the war left Iraq vulnerable to influence from Iran and wracked by internal sectarian violence.

“The Bush administra­tion misled the American people by saying there were weapons of mass destructio­n in Iraq that Iraq posed an imminent threat, and by drawing a false connection between the tragic events of 9/11 and Saddam Hussein,” said Rep. Barbara Lee, DCalif., chief sponsor of the House bill. “Those lies and misinforma­tion had deadly consequenc­es. The mistakes continue to haunt us today.”

Among Americans, the war became increasing­ly unpopular as it dragged on for years and claimed the lives of more than 4,400 U.S. troops.

The House bill won bipartisan support and passed by a vote of 268-161, with 49 Republican­s joining nearly all Democrats in voting for the bill.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee

will take up its version of the Iraq War bill on Tuesday. Its proposal also would repeal the 1991 authorizat­ion for the first Gulf War.

Many Democrats hope Thursday’s vote will be just the start of a broader push to limit the president’s war powers and either nix or narrow other military force authorizat­ions.

Next up on their wish list: repealing the 2001 authorizat­ion for military force that Congress passed to give Bush the power to target al-Qaida, the terrorist group responsibl­e for 9/11.

That measure is much broader than the Iraq War authorizat­ion, and it has been used as a legal justificat­ion for strikes against the Islamic State group in Syria and other terror groups around the globe.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters on Tuesday.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters on Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States