USA TODAY US Edition

‘People fear what they don’t know’

Joe Biden’s pro-LGBTQ stance spurs anti-LGBTQ falsehoods online, offline

- Daniel Funke USA TODAY

Since Joe Biden became the Democratic presidenti­al front-runner last summer, false claims about the LGBTQ community have surged on social media.

Thousands of people shared posts that erroneousl­y link LGBTQ people to pedophilia. Claims about legislatio­n such as the Equality Act distorted the facts on gender identity and sexual orientatio­n.

Experts and historians said those false claims – amplified across social media platforms in spite of the companies’ policies – tap into age-old myths to push back against gains for the LGBTQ rights movement.

“I think that we’ve definitely seen increased anti-LGBTQ, particular­ly antitrans, disinforma­tion as a political tactic,” said Brennan Suen, director of the LGBTQ program at Media Matters for America, a liberal nonprofit group that tracks misinforma­tion from rightleani­ng sources.

“Disinforma­tion” is false informatio­n deliberate­ly created and shared to cause harm, the motivation­s ranging from financial to psychologi­cal, according to First Draft, a nonprofit group that monitors online content. “Misinforma­tion” is false informatio­n that is not intended to cause harm.

Some advocates said the influx of misinforma­tion has moved offline.

Since January, when President Biden signed executive orders allowing transgende­r Americans to serve in the military and preventing discrimina­tion based on sexual orientatio­n and gender identity, state lawmakers have introduced dozens of bills aimed at preventing transgende­r students from participat­ing on sports teams. Governors in several states signed those bills into law, requiring transgende­r athletes to compete according to the sex they were assigned at birth instead of their gender identity.

“The narratives that we’ve been seeing have actually turned into anti-trans legislatio­n that attacks trans kids for wanting to play sports,” said Sarah Kate Ellis, president and CEO of GLAAD, an LGBTQ media monitoring organizati­on. “It’s not just misinforma­tion – it’s legislatio­n.”

Idaho state Rep. Barbara Ehardt doesn’t see it that way.

“In the world of sport, biological sex matters,” said Ehardt, a former college basketball player and coach.

In February 2020, Ehardt, a Republican, introduced the first bill to restrict transgende­r athletes’ participat­ion in school sports. After drafting the bill, she sought input from the Alliance for Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservati­ve Christian advocacy organizati­on that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) deemed a hate group, in part because its leaders have falsely claimed LGBTQ people are more likely to engage in pedophilia. The ADF refuted that categoriza­tion, saying it has “biblically­based views on marriage, human sexuality, and sanctity of life” and denying that it believes same-sex attraction is linked to pedophilia.

Ehardt’s legislatio­n has been copied around the country. As those bills make their way through Republican-controlled state legislatur­es that are increasing­ly at odds on the issue with a Democrat-controlled federal government, misinforma­tion about transgende­r people reaches Americans on their social media feeds.

“You just can’t change someone’s identity, but what you can do is make someone feel terrible for their identity,” said Melissa Michelson, a political science professor who studies LGBTQ rights at Menlo College. “We are literally putting LGBTQ lives in danger with these lies.”

Anti-LGBTQ falsehoods

The falsehoods bubbled up in July. “Love is gender and age-blind,” one Facebook post said.

“Some people are child lovers. Get over it,” read another.

“#agefluid,” scores of Instagram users wrote.

The posts, and others like them, falsely claimed that pedophiles were joining the LGBTQ community as a new sexual identity.

Thousands of Facebook and Instagram users shared posts with made-up words such as “clovergend­er” and “pedosexual,” according to CrowdTangl­e, a social media insights tool. Google searches for the terms spiked. Some of the claims stemmed from years-long efforts by internet trolls on fringe sites such as 4chan to discredit the LGBTQ community.

“With transphobi­a, children often come up because of the linkage to this false associatio­n between trans people and pedophilia,” said Joan Donovan, disinforma­tion expert and research director at Harvard’s Shorenstei­n Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.

In mid-July, a conspiracy theory falsely connecting Wayfair, an online furniture store, to child sex traffickin­g took off on social media. From late July to August, the QAnon conspiracy theory – which says a global cabal of government, media and Hollywood elites are part of a satanic, cannibalis­tic child sex traffickin­g ring – grew rapidly both onand offline. Thousands of supporters and sympathize­rs brandishin­g signs with #SaveOurChi­ldren rallied.

The barrage of misinforma­tion linking the LGBTQ community to pedophilia came a month after a Supreme Court ruling barred workplace discrimina­tion based on sexual orientatio­n and gender identity.

After Biden beat Donald Trump in the presidenti­al election in November, antiLGBTQ misinforma­tion spread about Biden’s policy positions.

“I think the surge is part of a clear campaign that is pushing back against increases in the cultural acceptance of trans people – both themselves and prominent people who are parents of trans children,” said Ange-Marie Hancock Alfaro, chair of the political science and internatio­nal relations department at the University of Southern California, in an email to USA TODAY.

In February, debate over the Equality Act, a Democratic proposal that would prohibit discrimina­tion based on sexual orientatio­n and gender identity, reached a fever pitch in the House of Representa­tives. Before the bill moved to the Senate, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. – who has expressed support for QAnon – pushed back by promoting traditiona­l notions of gender identity rejected by doctors, psychologi­sts and other scientists.

In October, social media users and conservati­ve super PACs misconstru­ed Biden’s comments condemning antitransg­ender discrimina­tion to mean he supported children transition­ing. After Biden’s inaugurati­on, the narrative morphed into Biden and Assistant Health Secretary Rachel Levine supporting sex reassignme­nt surgery for children without parental consent.

During and after her confirmati­on process, Levine was the target of misinforma­tion and transphobi­c rhetoric online. Social media posts falsely claimed that Levine said Mr. Potato Head and Dr. Seuss books were bad for kids.

Levine told USA TODAY she doesn’t have personal social media accounts, in part because of the backlash and hateful comments. The former Pennsylvan­ia health secretary follows what’s said about her in the mainstream media, but she doesn’t let the attacks get to her.

“I am able to compartmen­talize that very well. I don’t worry too much about what people say,” Levine told USA TODAY. “And so I worry about the impact on the LGBTQ community, particular­ly LGBTQ and trans youth.”

Misinforma­tion taps into myths

Experts who study LGBTQ history said many of the false narratives aren’t new.

“The idea of children being vulnerable or endangered has been at the center of opposition to LGBTQ activism for as long as there’s been LGBTQ activism,” said Timothy Stewart-Winter, an associate professor of history at Rutgers University.

Marc Robert Stein, a historian and professor at San Francisco State University, said pedophilia accusation­s “even predate the developmen­t of LGBT identities and communitie­s in the late 19th century.”

“Some of the earliest sodomy prosecutio­ns that we’ve found in history, even as far back as colonial America, focus on adult-child sexual acts,” he said. “So that cultural associatio­n was made in the context of those transgress­ions.”

In the mid-20th century, gays and lesbians were purged from government positions during the Lavender Scare, an outgrowth of Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s anti-communist campaign. That purgereste­d on the conspiracy theory that LGBTQ Americans were more likely to be security risks and communist sympathize­rs.

“People fear what they don’t know,” Stewart-Winter said. “A decade or 20 or 50 years ago, most people might not have known someone who is gay. And I think today, trans people are similarly kind of not necessaril­y known to a ton of people, and so they’re susceptibl­e to false accounts.”

In May, GLAAD published its inaugural Social Media Safety Index, which took stock of the experience­s of LGBTQ people on social media platforms. Despite company policies against harmful misinforma­tion and hate speech, GLAAD found Facebook ads with false claims about HIV prevention drugs, YouTube videos amplifying the debunked theory that transgende­r identity is a mental illness and Instagram posts with anti-LGBTQ slurs.

The report’s conclusion: “The entire (social media) sector is effectivel­y unsafe for LGBTQ users.”

“We see this as an enormous problem for our community,” Ellis said. “And right now, the target and the focus is our trans youth within our community, presumably the most marginaliz­ed within the community – and the ones with the least amount of voice, as youngsters.”

LGBTQ advocates said the transgende­r athlete bills are an outgrowth of misinforma­tion. They point to the fact that experts have said there’s no scientific basis for the proposals and many lawmakers haven’t cited local examples of transgende­r athletes causing issues in school sports.

“They’re not responding to community advocates, they’re not responding to any kind of grassroots need,” Suen said of the bills. “They’re completely responding to national extreme groups like Heritage Foundation, Family Research Council and Alliance for Defending Freedom – and they’re responding to a loss of the Senate and of the presidency.”

Republican­s and advocacy groups said the bills are rooted in a real issue: protecting the fairness of women’s sports.

“Gender identity policies in sports are causing women and girls to lose hard-won equality, safety and opportunit­y in school athletics,” said Emilie Kao, director of the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at conservati­ve think tank the Heritage Foundation, in an email to USA TODAY. Kao referred to female transgende­r athletes as “males who identify as females.”

The Family Research Council, a fundamenta­list Christian organizati­on, haspublish­ed similar views on its website over the past few months.

USA TODAY was unable to reach the group for comment.

Erhardt said the ADF helped get her transgende­r athlete bill off the ground, but the idea was her own.

She was partly inspired by a Dear Colleague letter issued in 2016 by the Obama administra­tion. The guidance, which the Trump administra­tion rescinded in early 2017, interprete­d Title IX of the Education Amendments Act to mean schools generally must permit students to participat­e in sex-segregated activities in accordance with their gender identity.

“As I looked at that and I looked at just how close we were teetering on the edge of just having everything turned upside down, it became apparent that we needed to protect our state and protect our girls and our women with legislatio­n that would allow them to continue to compete with other girls and women,” Ehardt said.

Since Ehardt introduced her bill, called the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, dozens of states have copied the law – some verbatim. The spate of legislatio­n began in January after Biden’s executive order calling on federal agencies to bar discrimina­tion based on gender identity, which mentioned school sports in passing.

“We are encouraged by legislator­s who have authored and introduced legislatio­n which simply reinforces what Title IX was designed to do: provide equal opportunit­ies and fair competitio­n for women and girls,” Christiana Holcomb, legal counsel for the ADF, said in a statement emailed to USA TODAY.

Ehardt said seeing those proposals has been “very gratifying,” although she recognizes that “everyone bringing this legislatio­n may not have the same motives.”

Political scientists told USA TODAY the flurry of bills is part of a tried-andtrue strategy for conservati­ves, one that’s become more popular as the country recovers from the coronaviru­s pandemic.

“When the economy is recovering and the pandemic is fading ... opposition leaders have to find another wedge issue to distinguis­h themselves,” Hancock Alfaro said. “And culture wars issues like sexuality and gender identity can be an effective way to mobilize their like-minded voters for the 2022 midterm elections.”

In mid-June, the Education Department built on Biden’s executive order by reinstatin­g the Obama-era guidance on transgende­r students. This week, the Supreme Court declined to weigh in on the case of Gavin Grimm, a transgende­r man at the center of a years-long battle over school bathrooms. The decision permitted a lower court’s ruling, which found Grimm’s former high school could not prohibit students from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity, to stand.

Those developmen­ts, in addition to the high court’s ruling last year in Bostock v. Clayton County, were wins for the LGBTQ rights movement. Another case raises questions about the conflict between LGBTQ rights and religious freedom. This month, the Supreme Court ruled that a Catholic foster care agency in Philadelph­ia could turn away same-sex couples for religious reasons.

“There’s only so much excitement you can get out of people about taxes and infrastruc­ture and gerrymande­ring,” Michelson said. “But when you turn to these issues that are seen as good vs. evil – when it’s about protecting the unborn or it’s about protecting innocent children – that’s really where you get people fired up.”

 ?? DAVID MCNEW/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? People wave a rainbow flag Nov. 7 as they celebrate Joe Biden’s victory in the presidenti­al election. Some decried Biden’s win.
DAVID MCNEW/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES People wave a rainbow flag Nov. 7 as they celebrate Joe Biden’s victory in the presidenti­al election. Some decried Biden’s win.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States