USA TODAY US Edition

Probe sought into Alzheimer’s drug approval

FDA worries over contact with manufactur­er

- Matthew Perrone The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsibl­e for all content.

WASHINGTON – The acting head of the Food and Drug Administra­tion on Friday called for a government investigat­ion into highly unusual contacts between her agency’s drug reviewers and the maker of a controvers­ial new Alzheimer’s drug.

Dr. Janet Woodcock announced the extraordin­ary step via Twitter. It’s the latest fallout over last month’s approval of Aduhelm, an expensive and unproven therapy that the agency OK’d against the advice of its own outside experts.

Woodcock made the request to the Department of Health and Human Services’ inspector general, the watchdog agency that oversees the FDA and other federal health agencies. The move comes after numerous calls for a probe into the approval from medical experts, consumer advocates and members of Congress. Two congressio­nal committees have already launched their own review.

“We believe an independen­t assessment is the best manner in which to determine whether any interactio­ns that occurred between the manufactur­er and the agency’s review staff were inconsiste­nt with FDA’s policies and procedures,” Woodcock wrote on Twitter. Biogen pledged to cooperate with the inquiry.

Last month, the health news site Stat reported on the unusually close collaborat­ion between Aduhelm drugmaker Biogen and FDA staff. In particular, the site reported an “off-the-books” meeting in May 2019 between a top Biogen executive and the FDA’s lead reviewer for Alzheimer’s drugs.

The meeting came after Biogen stopped two studies because the drug didn’t seem to slow the disease as intended.

Biogen and the FDA began reanalyzin­g the data together, concluding the drug may actually work. The collaborat­ion ultimately led to the drug’s conditiona­l approval two years later, on the basis that it reduced a buildup of sticky plaque in the brain that is thought to play a role in Alzheimer’s disease.

FDA interactio­ns with drug industry staff are tightly controlled and almost always carefully documented. It’s unclear if the May 2019 meeting violated agency rules.

When Biogen and FDA brought the drug before the FDA’s panel of outside advisers in November, the group was nearly unanimous in urging its rejection.

The FDA isn’t required to follow the group’s advice. And the FDA lead staff reviewer – who had been working with Biogen for months on the drug’s data – called it “exceptiona­lly persuasive,” “strongly positive” and “robust.”

The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen called for an investigat­ion into the collaborat­ion after the November advisory meeting. The group’s health director Dr. Michael Carome welcomed Woodcock’s request for an inquiry.

“We’re pleased to see that belatedly she has made this request that should have been made months ago,” Carome said. “The signs of an inappropri­ate collaborat­ion have been clear to us since

November.”

The FDA has faced intense backlash since approving the drug, which costs $56,000 a year and requires monthly IVs.

Three of the FDA advisers who opposed the drug resigned over the decision. Among other issues, they protested that the agency did not disclose that it was considerin­g approving the drug on a conditiona­l basis, based on its effect on brain plaque, rather than any actual benefit to patients. Aduhelm is the first Alzheimer’s drug approved in that manner.

“I think all the different parts of the decision are worthwhile for an independen­t investigat­ion,” said Harvard University researcher Dr. Aaron Kesselheim, one of the three advisers who resigned. “The trust that we have in FDA’s ability to make independen­t decisions is very important.”

On Thursday, the FDA took the unusual step of vastly scaling back prescribin­g informatio­n on the drug. The agency and Biogen announced the new label would recommend that it only be given to patients with mild or early-stage Alzheimer’s. That came after many doctors criticized the original label as too broad, because it said the drug could be given to anyone with Alzheimer’s.

Aduhelm hasn’t been shown to reverse or significan­tly slow the disease. But the FDA said that its ability to reduce clumps of plaque in the brain is likely to slow dementia.

More than two dozen other drugs have previously tried that approach without yielding positive results. Biogen is required to conduct a follow-up study to definitive­ly answer whether it really works. Other Alzheimer’s drugs only temporaril­y ease symptoms.

 ?? BIOGEN VIA AP ?? The FDA approved Aduhelm, an expensive and unproven therapy, last month.
BIOGEN VIA AP The FDA approved Aduhelm, an expensive and unproven therapy, last month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States