Labor shortage hits wildfire suppressio­n

Officials brace for another busy fire season

- Zach Urness

SALEM, Ore. – The U.S. government committed a record-setting amount of money to fighting wildfires this year during what promises to be a busy season, but it’s unclear whether enough firefighte­rs will be available amid a nationwide labor crunch.

Fire season is off to a busy start as drought fuels danger from the Great Plains to Northern California. Federal officials are scrambling to hire roughly 16,900 fire personnel, including helitack crews that are flown to wildfires.

A letter from 28 members of Congress called on the two federal agencies that fight wildfires – the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior – to create a special pay rate for federal firefighte­rs “to avert critical staffing shortages in the wildland firefighti­ng workforce.”

The two agencies have a combined budget of $4.7 billion. They have 1,549 fire engines and more than 310 helicopter­s, air tankers and airplanes that can drop water or watch forests for smoke.

Without adequate staffing, many of those fire engines could sit idle, the letter said, noting that “last year, fire officials were unable to fill an unpreceden­ted 1,800 requests for wildland firefighti­ng crews and more than 1,900 requests for fire engines.”

Overall, the number of firefighte­rs and resources should be slightly up from last year. Both agencies can draw from funding for a couple of hundred additional firefighte­rs and $100 million in disaster funds to avoid raiding their budgets during expensive fire seasons.

The amount the federal government spends on wildfire suppressio­n has steadily risen over decades as wildfires became larger and more intense, reaching a record-setting $4.38 billion in 2021. A year ago, monster infernos such as California’s Dixie and Caldor fires burned more than a million acres, destroyed towns and more than 2,300 structures and cost $900 million and thousands of firefighte­rs to suppress.

And in addition to federal firefighte­rs, many states are upping the number of wildland firefighte­rs they employ.

Concern about hiring firefighte­rs

The reality of hiring firefighte­rs has proved challengin­g in the tight labor market.

“This is an urgent threat to natural resources, public safety, and taxpayer dollars, as the federal government pays a premium to contract and borrow firefighti­ng resources from state and local authoritie­s when federal resources are unavailabl­e,” the letter from lawmakers said.

In testimony before the Senate Appropriat­ions Committee on May 4, Forest Service Chief Randy Moore said the agency hired about 10,200 firefighte­rs, out of its goal of 11,300. Some areas reached only 50% of their staffing goals.

“We are making offers, and there’s a lot of declinatio­ns in those offers,” Moore said. “There’s a lot of competitio­n in the labor market for these skills. Because when you have county, state and private firefighte­rs often sometimes [making] double the salaries the Forest Service firefighte­rs are making, it’s very hard to compete with that.”

Firefighte­rs with the Forest Service earn about $38,000 per year, while their counterpar­ts who work for private or state firefighti­ng agencies make closer to $70,000 to $80,000, acting Forest Service chief Vicki Christians­en said at a hearing last year. Entry-level firefighte­rs make as little as $15 per hour.

Forest Service officials declined to say exactly where the shortfalls in hiring were, but the statistics drew concern from Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.

“Fifty percent sounds a little scary when you’re thinking about the fires that we’ll be facing in our various states,” Merkley said at the hearing.

He was confident that “the agency is making steady progress in hiring more firefighte­rs and is working to have the firefighti­ng resources they need as wildfire season gets underway,” he said in an email to the Salem Statesman Journal, part of the USA TODAY Network.

The Department of the Interior, which plans to hire 5,600 fire personnel, said it had hired 4,100, but it was typical not to reach full staffing until summer.

The letter said years of low pay and other issues “hollowed out the federal wildland firefighti­ng workforce.”

An end to ‘fire borrowing’

The money available to federal agencies to fight wildfires has grown since a bill in 2018 establishe­d the ability for agencies to access a “disaster/reserve” fund that grew to $2.45 billion this year, up from $2.35 billion a year ago.

In 2018, Congress passed legislatio­n that allowed the agencies to tap disaster funds when suppressio­n costs exceeded their budget.

The Forest Service and Interior Department said the legislatio­n helped eliminate the practice of “fire borrowing,” in which the agencies raided from recreation, engineerin­g and even fire prevention programs to pay for the soaring costs of fighting wildfires.

If either agency uses up its fire suppressio­n budget, it can go to the emergency fund. It can pay for additional contract firefighte­rs, large fire camps or whatever else might be needed.

“Since 2018, the Forest Service and Interior are no longer forced to raid prevention funds to fight fires,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who helped write the legislatio­n. “Oregonians know all too well the devastatio­n of today’s wildfires. When it comes to saving lives and property from destructio­n, prevention and suppressio­n must go hand in hand.”

The forecast of the coming season paints a picture of high wildfire danger in the Southwest before the above-normal risk shifts to Northern California by June, the middle of the county by July and much of the West Coast by August.

This year already has been active: Arizona’s Tunnel Fire burned 30 homes, and wildfires in New Mexico forced the evacuation of thousands. In California, a wildfire ignited Wednesday along the coastal bluffs in Laguna Niguel. At least 20 homes were burned in the area.

“I’d say we’re preparing for another long year,” said Jessica Gardetto, a National Interagenc­y Fire Center spokeswoma­n in Boise and a former wildland firefighte­r. “Almost the entire central swath of the country comes into the (high danger) zone, so if we have a lot of activity there, and then if we have the type of fires we’ve seen across the West recently, that could be a real strain on resources.”

During the height of the 2021 wildfire season, which was more active than normal, crews across the West reported being short-staffed as resources were shifted to areas where the danger to communitie­s was highest.

“Last year, we did get stretched pretty thin on resources,” Forest Service spokesman Brian Reublinger said. “But it’s pretty normal that fires will exchange resources and things when one fire has a greater need over another, especially in a busy year.”

Much of the risk is spurred by the megadrough­t west of the Mississipp­i River. Seventy-five percent of the High Plains is experienci­ng at least moderate drought while 77% of the West is mired in severe drought, despite improvemen­ts during a wet and cool April, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor.

Long-term forecasts indicate a hot and dry summer across the USA – potentiall­y fueling quick-spreading fires.

The fire season looks a bit better than a year ago – which set records for destructio­n and cost – but not much, Gardetto said. “At this point, all we can do is plan for the worst and hope for the best,” she said.

 ?? CHRIS PIETSCH/USA TODAY NETWORK ?? Brentt Call, left, and Mike Poulos, with Utah Taskforce One, take a break on the Bootleg Fire east of Klamath Falls. Ore., last year.
CHRIS PIETSCH/USA TODAY NETWORK Brentt Call, left, and Mike Poulos, with Utah Taskforce One, take a break on the Bootleg Fire east of Klamath Falls. Ore., last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States