Race also is a key in restrictive voting laws

Study tracks racial resentment plus party

Restrictive voting laws passed in the wake of the 2020 election were more prevalent in Republican-controlled states with racially diverse populations, according to a new analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The Brennan Center report released Wednesday indicates restrictive voter rights and voting access legislation, introduced in all but one state since 2020, is not purely a partisan issue, despite deepening party-line battles around elections in the U.S.

“It may be somewhat of a surprise to folks that this isn’t just a story about party,” said Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the Brennan Center’s Voting Rights division. “(Voting rights have) become an incredibly polarized, political issue, and I think people are used to thinking about it as a partisan issue. But this study shows it’s not just party that is playing a role here. It’s about race as well.”

Researchers analyzed “restrictive” voting provisions introduced in state legislatures in 2021, political and demographic makeup of legislative districts and the 2020 Cooperative Election Study, conducted before and after major U.S. elections.

‘Racial resentment’

The study examines “racial resentment,” a political science term developed in the 1980s to measure the role race plays in public opinion.

The Brennan Center report found at the legislative district level, “representatives from the whitest districts in the most racially diverse states were the most likely to sponsor anti-voter bills.” At the state level, the intersection of race and partisanship was the strongest indicator of restrictive voting bills, as less diverse states were “unlikely” to introduce or pass restrictive legislation regardless of party.

“We are not seeing these bills introduced and passed everywhere that Republicans have control; rather, they are most prevalent in states where they have control and where there are significant non-white populations,” the Brennan Center report states.

Republicans have argued increased voting-security legislation, such as voter ID and voting-roll purges, is necessary for ensuring election integrity, though experts say there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

New ‘anti-voter’ laws limit access

A 2021 USA Today analysis found that while some states passed post-2020 laws to expand voting access, 55 million eligible voters faced new “anti-voter” laws limiting access to the ballot last year. Americans overall lost more than 160 days in absentee-voting availability with the changes.

Voting-rights issues have been a particularly hot-button topic in the wake of former President Donald Trump’s repeated, unfounded claims that the 2020 election was rigged.

Former members of Trump’s Cabinet and even Trump’s own family now acknowledge the election was legitimate, but misinformation efforts peddling conspiracy theories continue to affect the U.S. election landscape.

States with unified Republican control of the legislature and governor’s office might be expected to pass restrictive voting laws at the same rate, Morales-Doyle said, but the research showed “how race and party don’t line up perfectly in this country.”

The Brennan Center cites differing 2021 legislative activity in the most uncompetitive Republican states, where four of the “whitest” states – Wyoming, North Dakota, Montana and West Virginia – introduced less than half the number of voting rights restrictions seen in the most racially diverse uncompetitive GOP states of Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma and Alaska.