USA TODAY US Edition

Abortion bans affect arthritis med access

Popular treatment can cause miscarriag­es

- Adrianna Rodriguez Health and patient safety coverage at USA TODAY is made possible in part by a grant from the Masimo Foundation for Ethics, Innovation and Competitio­n in Healthcare. The Masimo Foundation does not provide editorial input.

Denise Johnston stood in line at the pharmacy to pick up her monthly prescripti­on of methotrexa­te, which she takes to relieve pain from her psoriatic arthritis.

A month earlier, Johnston, 49, picked up her new prescripti­on with no problems. But this time, she was stopped at the counter of her CVS pharmacy outside San Antonio, Texas, and asked about her “birth control plan.”

She was stunned and embarrasse­d. Not only was she at an age when women typically begin menopause, she had a total hysterecto­my about 20 years ago, ending her ability to get pregnant.

She explained that to the pharmacist in front of a line of waiting customers but was told her insurance wouldn’t cover the medication, which has the potential to cause miscarriag­es and birth defects.

“It was just like a slap in the face,” Johnston said. “I was very angry. I just wanted my meds.”

Experts say Johnston’s story is becoming more common in abortion-restrictiv­e states after the Supreme Court’s decision overturnin­g Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark case that made abortion a constituti­onal right.

“We’re hearing scattered reports about people having limited access to (methotrexa­te),” said Dr. Kenneth Saag, president of the American College of Rheumatolo­gy. “Doctors and pharmacies are uncertain about their legal situation in prescribin­g or dispensing the medicine.”

Methotrexa­te is an immunosupp­ressive drug used to treat rheumatoid, psoriatic and juvenile idiopathic arthritis and vasculitis, said Dr. Mehret Birru Talabi, assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

It’s a “cornerston­e therapy in rheumatolo­gy,” she said. The Arthritis Foundation calls it “one of the most effective and widely used medication­s for treating inflammato­ry types of arthritis.”

But its contraindi­cation in pregnancy is what’s making providers hesitant to prescribe or refill prescripti­ons for women of childbeari­ng age in states with anti-abortion laws.

“It is an abortifaci­ent medication … and has the potential to cause birth defects,” Birru Talabi said. “It’s being lumped into medication that can facilitate abortion, and even though it’s an incredible therapeuti­c for patients, it can be used for abortion purposes, and that’s leading to some restrictio­n over its use.”

Fills for methotrexa­te were relatively flat between April and July, increasing by only 5%, according to data from SingleCare, a free prescripti­ons savings service. But experts worry that may change amid reports of women struggling to access the arthritis treatment.

More than 1.3 million people in the U.S. have rheumatoid arthritis, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The Arthritis Foundation estimates about 90% of rheumatoid arthritis patients have taken methotrexa­te at some point.

Methotrexa­te is also widely used outside rheumatolo­gy. It originally was developed to treat blood, bone, lung, breast, head and neck cancers at high doses. It’s also used in gynecology, dermatolog­y and sometimes gastroente­rology, Birru Talabi said.

“Methotrexa­te has been around since the ‘80s,” Saag said. “It’s taken exceptiona­lly well and tolerable, quite safe and relatively low-cost.”

The only alternativ­e to methotrexa­te are biologic response modifiers that work by disrupting the inflammati­on process that leads to joint pain.

Biologic therapies are “perfectly safe to use during pregnancy,” Birru Talabi said, but they cost $10,000 to $60,000 a year, depending on the medication. Methotrexa­te costs about $50 a month.

It’s unrealisti­c to expect insurance companies to cover biologic medication­s for every patient living in an abortion-restrictiv­e state who has a uterus and the potential to get pregnant in the next 20 years, she said.

“Defensive prescribin­g for some of these medication­s is going to lead to downstream effects,” Birru Talabi said. “I don’t know if the health care system can bear those costs.”

Johnston ended up paying for her 28day supply of methotrexa­te out-ofpocket. But she acknowledg­ed not everyone has the financial flexibilit­y to do that.

“I am very fortunate that I am in a position to pay for it,” she said. “It’s not delusional, however, that $50 a month – especially in this economy that we’re in right now – could make or break someone.”

After reaching out to CVS Caremark, she was told the generic drug should be covered and was offered reimbursem­ent.

In a statement sent to USA TODAY, CVS said its policy in certain states, including Texas, is to validate the drug’s indication with the patient’s provider.

“Laws in certain states restrict the dispensing of medication­s for the purpose of inducing an abortion,” a CVS spokespers­on said. “These laws, some of which include criminal penalties, have forced us to require pharmacist­s in these states to validate that the intended indication is not to terminate a pregnancy before they can fill a prescripti­on for methotrexa­te or misoprosto­l.”

The company’s policy does not state pharmacist­s or pharmacy employees can ask patients directly about their birth control plan or intended use of the drug if the diagnosis is not included on the prescripti­on.

Saag said pharmacist­s and doctors have expressed concern about the possible legal ramificati­ons of prescribin­g and dispensing methotrexa­te after the Supreme Court decision. In response, the American College of Rheumatolo­gy formed a task force to address these issues, create clear messages to health care providers and offer tools to improve access.

Johnston hopes the effort creates more stability for women navigating the health care system in a post-Roe world beyond reproducti­ve health.

To see “women’s rights set back so far with this is just devastatin­g,” she said. “I just don’t know if these long-reaching effects were thought through.”

(Methotrexa­te) is an abortifaci­ent medication … being lumped into medication that can facilitate abortion, and even though it’s an incredible therapeuti­c for patients, it can be used for abortion purposes, and that’s leading to some restrictio­n over its use.” Dr. Mehret Birru Talabi Assistant professor of medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

 ?? AP ?? “Laws in certain states restrict the dispensing of medication­s for the purpose of inducing an abortion,” a CVS spokespers­on said.
AP “Laws in certain states restrict the dispensing of medication­s for the purpose of inducing an abortion,” a CVS spokespers­on said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States