USA TODAY US Edition

‘College Athletes Bill of Rights’ is reintroduc­ed

- Steve Berkowitz

Five U.S. senators joined in reintroduc­ing legislatio­n Thursday that would dramatical­ly alter the compensati­on and treatment of athletes in major-college sports programs.

It also would place new annual reporting requiremen­ts on schools regarding their compliance with Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimina­tion in educationa­l programs.

The bill, again being named the “College Athletes Bill of Rights,” is similar to a measure that Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Richard Blumenthal, DConn., introduced in late December 2020.

At that time, a congressio­nal session was coming to a close amid the need to pass year-end spending bills and COVID-19 relief measures, so it was understood the measure would need to be brought up again.

This time, Booker and Blumenthal are being joined by three other Democrats: Brian Schatz, Hawaii; Ron Wyden, Ore., and Alex Padilla, Calif.

However, throughout congressio­nal conversati­ons about college sports that have occurred since states began passing laws that allow athletes to make money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL), Republican­s have been interested in legislatio­n that is limited almost exclusivel­y to standardiz­ing issues connected to NIL.

On Wednesday, Sens. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., and Joe Manchin, D-W. Va.,

announced that they were soliciting input from college sports stakeholde­rs on legislatio­n related to NIL.

They made no mention of the broader changes that have been pursued by Democrats, several of whom introduced a bill in May 2021 that would make college athletes at public schools employees of the schools and give them the right to collective­ly bargain.

The new iteration of the Senate bill drops the most controvers­ial concept from the December 2020 version, a provision that required a form of revenue sharing between schools and athletes. However, Thursday’s 69-page measure keeps nearly all of the other original concepts, all of which would be backed up by an oversight commission appointed by the president and the right of any athlete to bring a federal civil lawsuit if they believe provisions are being violated.

This version also includes a new section, titled “Right to Title IX Equity,” that would establish a series of annual requiremen­ts for schools, including that they evaluate their compliance with the gender-equity law in athletics, “using all relevant measures,” and publish this evaluation on the school’s website.

The NCAA would be required to “permanentl­y ban” from college sports anyone who “knowingly provides misleading informatio­n or causes omissions for the purpose of affecting” the required Title IX evaluation.

Despite tremendous gains during the past five decades, many colleges and universiti­es fall short of complying with Title IX, leaving women struggling for equity, an ongoing series by USA TODAY has found.

The new bill maintains a provision from the original version that would prevent a school from dropping a team “unless all other options for reducing the expenses of the athletic program, including reducing coach salaries and administra­tive and facility expenses, are not feasible.”

Among the provisions also originally covered in the December 2020 version, the bill introduced Thursday would include:

Federal codificati­on of athletes’ rights to make money from the NIL through endorsemen­ts and other activities, including group licensing. Schools also could not “prohibit or discourage” an athlete from wearing the shoes of their choice in mandatory team activities “unless the footwear has lights, reflective fabric, or poses a health risk.” This would allow athletes to have endorsemen­t deals with shoe and apparel companies that conflict with schools’ contracts.

The establishm­ent of a medical trust fund that would help athletes with health care costs related to injuries suffered during their college careers, including head injuries.

In this version of the bill, while schools also would be responsibl­e for helping their athletes in the years after their careers, the broader trust fund money would come from annual payments that would be required of any athletic associatio­n, including the NCAA, or conference that has more than $200 million in annual athletic revenue. The trust fund would receive a total of up to $50 million each year.

A set of educationa­l protection­s for athletes, including a requiremen­t that anyone who receives an athletic scholarshi­p for an academic year generally be provided with a scholarshi­p at that school until they receive an undergradu­ate degree from the school.

There also are provisions that say a school “may not attempt to discourage” an athlete “from selecting a course or an academic major of their choice”; or retaliate against an athlete based on selection of any course or major.

In addition, the bill also says schools cannot impose restrictio­ns on athletes’ speech that are more stringent than those imposed on students who are not athletes.

 ?? ANDREW HARNIK/AP ?? Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., center, is one of the co-sponsors of the ‘College Athletes Bill of Rights’ bill.
ANDREW HARNIK/AP Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., center, is one of the co-sponsors of the ‘College Athletes Bill of Rights’ bill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States