USA TODAY US Edition

Swift’s ticket debacle puts focus on prices

- Marco della Cava and Hannah Yasharoff

Taylor Swift may well be spearheadi­ng a revolution in the concert ticketing world.

Last week, Swift put tickets on sale for her highly anticipate­d new tour through Ticketmast­er only for many furious Swifties to be left stranded.

Fans of music stars such as Bruce Springstee­n, Pearl Jam, Foo Fighters, Rage Against The Machine, Garth Brooks and others have long cast a critical eye on the company, voicing their frustratio­ns with the ticket-buying process. U.S. Rep. Alexandria OcasioCort­ez, D-N.Y., fired off a blunt tweet: “Daily reminder that Ticketmast­er is a monopoly, it’s merger with LiveNation should never have been approved”; Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., expressed similar concerns, and Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti vowed to launch an anti-trust probe in response to consumer complaints.

What’s going on with Ticketmast­er?

The Department of Justice is reportedly intensifyi­ng its investigat­ion into Ticketmast­er, the ticketing giant that controls entry into a vast majority of the nation’s live events, and its parent company Live Nation, which merged in 2010 to form a management and ticketing juggernaut that critics have argued is a monopoly that does a disservice to fans, artists and venue owners alike.

The Justice Department has opened an antitrust investigat­ion into Ticketmast­er, according to a report in The New York Times. The company is owned by Live Nation, which focused on managing talent.

According to the report, Justice Department lawyers have been in touch with both ticket-selling competitor­s and venues to inquire about Live Nation’s overall practices. When the Ticketmast­er merger with Live Nation was approved in 2010, Justice Department officials stipulated that Live Nation could not leverage its power to threaten venues to use Ticketmast­er for ticket sales.

But in 2019, a department investigat­ion found that the company had violated that agreement. New parameters were enforced.

Swift is not managed by Live Nation; her tours are promoted by the Messina Touring Group.

In a statement, Ticketmast­er said it “does not set or control ticket prices, strongly advocates for all-in pricing so that fans are not surprised by what tickets really cost, and is the undisputed market leader in ticket security and fighting bots,” adding that the company “does not embrace deceptive and questionab­le secondary ticketing practices prevalent on rival sites such as speculativ­e ticketing.”

Swift speaks out: ‘We asked them, multiple times, if they could handle this kind of demand’

Following a dayslong presale ticket frenzy, which saw major delays, errors and pauses in the queues to purchase tickets, Ticketmast­er ultimately canceled a scheduled Nov. 18 general sale due to “extraordin­arily high demands on ticketing systems and insufficie­nt remaining ticket inventory.”

Swift delivered a strongly-worded statement via social media, assuring fans it “really pisses me off” that many of them went to great lengths only to be left without tickets.

“There are a multitude of reasons why people had such a hard time trying to get tickets and I’m trying to figure out how this situation can be improved moving forward,” Swift added. “I’m not going to make excuses for anyone because we asked them, multiple times, if they could handle this kind of demand and we were assured they could.”

The U.S. leg of the Eras tour is scheduled for 52 shows in 20 cities from March to August 2023.

“I and all the LiveNation team is sympatheti­c to all the long wait times and fans who couldn’t get what they wanted,” Live Nation Chairman Greg Maffei said in a Nov. 17 interview with CNBC. “Reality is: It’s a function of the massive demand that Taylor Swift has. … We could have filled 900 stadiums.”

Ticketmast­er added in its statement that “even when a high-demand on sale goes flawlessly from a tech perspectiv­e, many fans are left empty handed.”

Bruce Springstee­n responds to fan outrage: ‘Ticket buying has gotten very confusing’

Springstee­n fans also felt as though they were burned by Ticketmast­er this year.

Over the summer, some floor seat tickets for the Bruce Springstee­n and the E Street Band 2023 U.S. arena tour were going for more than $4,000 thanks to Ticketmast­er’s dynamic pricing system, sparking outrage.

“Ticket buying has gotten very confusing, not just for the fans, but for the artists also,” Springstee­n said in a Rolling Stone interview published Nov. 18. “And the bottom line is that most of our tickets are totally affordable. … The ticket broker or someone is going to be taking that money. I’m going, ‘Hey, why shouldn’t that money go to the guys that are going to be up there sweating three hours a night for it?’ ”

Country megastar Garth Brooks made pointed statements about the perils of dynamic pricing this year, telling the Fort Worth Star-Telegram in August: “We’re all watching it. Here’s the bottom line for me, and I know this is silly, but I have screamed and screamed as long as you’ve known me: just knock out scalping. That’s it. Just make it illegal. That way, the price of the ticket is the price of the ticket.”

Springstee­n’s manager, Jon Landau, had defended their pricing decisions, telling The New York Times in a statement this summer that their team “chose prices that are lower than some (other major artists) and on par with others.”

He added: “Regardless of the commentary about a modest number of tickets costing $1,000 or more, our true average ticket price has been in the mid$200 range. I believe that in today’s environmen­t, that is a fair price to see someone universall­y regarded as among the very greatest artists of his generation.”

Paul McCartney’s Got Back tour and Harry Styles’ Love on Tour also recently saw prices skyrocketi­ng into the thousands.

How dynamic ticket pricing works

Back in 2011, Ticketmast­er announced it would institute a new dynamic ticket pricing system aimed at adjusting prices to shows based on consumer demand. The idea was that this approach might help keep tickets from immediatel­y flooding resellers such as StubHub, otherwise known as the secondary market.

The implicatio­n is that the artist, who ultimately decides whether or not to apply the dynamic pricing, keeps more of that higher ticket sale price compared with when those same tickets eventually cost the same high amount on a thirdparty site, where the artist gets no part of that increased price.

Good in theory, not so great in practice. Dynamic pricing, the same algorithm-controlled, supply-and-demand phenomenon responsibl­e for your Uber ride across town or plane ticket to see grandma suddenly costing more, has caused headaches such as the $4,000 ticket prices for Springstee­n’s shows.

Springstee­n told Rolling Stone he isn’t sure if he’ll avoid dynamic pricing in the future, but “we’ll be talking about it, of course.”

Ticketmast­er said only about 12% of tickets were so-called Platinum, and thus subject to dynamic pricing. The 88% of tickets sold at face value were priced at $59.50 to $399, with an average price of $202, Ticketmast­er told USA TODAY.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Demand for Taylor Swift’s Eras tour led to the cancellati­on of sales. “I’m trying to figure out how this situation can be improved,” she wrote.
GETTY IMAGES Demand for Taylor Swift’s Eras tour led to the cancellati­on of sales. “I’m trying to figure out how this situation can be improved,” she wrote.
 ?? PAUL MORIGI/GETTY IMAGES ?? “Ticket buying has gotten very confusing, not just for the fans, but for the artists,” Bruce Springstee­n said.
PAUL MORIGI/GETTY IMAGES “Ticket buying has gotten very confusing, not just for the fans, but for the artists,” Bruce Springstee­n said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States