USA TODAY US Edition

‘Comprehens­ive’ Jan. 6 report is coming out soon

Panel races the clock, grapples with content

- Bart Jansen

WASHINGTON – As a House committee winds down its investigat­ion of the attack on the U.S. Capitol, lawmakers said the inquiry already has changed the public perception of Donald Trump and what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.

The 18-month investigat­ion – with nine blockbuste­r hearings this year – documented Trump at the center of an effort to overturn the 2020 election and assemble a mob he sent to Congress to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power, committee members said. The findings sharply contrast with the contention from some Republican­s that the riot was a spontaneou­s demonstrat­ion that got out of hand.

The committee, which expires Dec. 31, is expected to publish its final report by Christmas and provide the most comprehens­ive account yet of what led to the worst attack on the Capitol in more than 200 years.

As the committee enters its final phase, more specifics about the report emerge while the committee grapples with what to include – a decision that surfaced an alleged behind-the-scenes spat, rare for a committee that carefully crafted its hearings around specific themes and unanimous decisions.

The report will include legislativ­e recommenda­tions about how to avoid a similar assault in the future. It will include eight chapters and the entirety will be published online, along with most transcript­s. Lawmakers haven’t decided whether to hold a meeting to release it, according to the panel’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.

“The report is half about the past and what we’ve just studied and half about the future and what needs to be done to protect ourselves from similar cycles of coup, insurrecti­on, electoral sabotage and political violence,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a committee member.

The report will be completed without the cooperatio­n of Trump, who is fighting a subpoena in federal court, or former Vice President Mike Pence. Meanwhile, Trump, who said he did nothing wrong in challengin­g election results, is campaignin­g for president again.

Lawmakers reached a consensus on the eight chapters, which are being factchecke­d, Thompson said.

Here is what we know about the report and its preparatio­n:

Discord reported over scope

NBC News and The Washington Post reported last month that committee staffers said preliminar­y plans called for the report to focus on Trump, as urged by the vice chair, Rep. Liz Cheney, RWyo., rather than issues such as intelligen­ce or law enforcemen­t failures.

But Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who also is chairman of the Intelligen­ce Committee, said he wanted the report to cover intelligen­ce issues.

“I’m advocating for that,” Schiff told CNN. “I think that’s part of the broad picture of why the Capitol was vulnerable to attack, what intelligen­ce we had, what intelligen­ce we missed, what intelligen­ce was put before law enforcemen­t and not acted upon.”

Cheney also said the report would span the committee’s work.

“The report will have in it chapters that address the topics that we addressed in our hearings,” Cheney said at a Washington Post event. “There’s been some assertion that the committee is not going to, you know, produce informatio­n about the security failures. That’s just simply not true. It’ll be a comprehens­ive report.”

Jeremy Adler, a Cheney spokesman, told The Post she was right to focus attention on Trump because he was the first president in history to attempt to overturn an election. He added that some committee staffers held liberal biases about federal law enforcemen­t and Republican­s outside the committee’s scope. “She won’t sign on to any ‘narrative’ that suggests Republican­s are inherently racist or smears men and women in law enforcemen­t, or suggests every American who believes God has blessed America is a white supremacis­t,” Adler said.

Tim Mulvey, a committee spokesman, told The Post all nine panel members were contributi­ng to the report, which will address every key aspect of the inquiry. He said the panel’s “historic, bipartisan fact-finding effort speaks for itself, and that won’t be changed by a handful of disgruntle­d staff who are uninformed about many parts of the committee’s ongoing work.”

Legislativ­e remedies

The report will make legislativ­e recommenda­tions for questions raised in the hearings such as overhaulin­g how Congress counts presidenti­al electoral votes, creating a congressio­nal panel for the option of removing a president, and clarifying how to call up the National Guard to deal with civil unrest.

The House already has approved legislatio­n to update the 1877 Electoral Count Act, which Trump’s lawyers argued offered an opening to overturn election results. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., supported the Senate version of the legislatio­n, indicating it could be approved.

Other questions are more contentiou­s. The 25th Amendment, which was ratified in 1967, allowed for a vice president to work with either a majority of a president’s Cabinet or the majority of a panel of lawmakers to remove an unfit president from office. But Congress never created such a panel, and the subject is often criticized as political.

Lawmakers and city officials spent hours on Jan. 6 pleading with the Pentagon to send National Guard troops to reinforce Capitol Police during the attack. But even after rioters breached the Capitol at 2:13 p.m., the troops arrived three hours later.

Republican­s who have criticized the inquiry as partisan and illegitima­te will take control of the House in January and might ignore the report’s recommenda­tions. Republican­s also have threatened to investigat­e gaps in the inquiry, including why the Capitol complex wasn’t secure on Jan. 6, and hold hearings.

House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, who is competing to become speaker in the next Congress, wrote Thompson last week reminding the panel to preserve all records and transcript­s collected during the inquiry. He cited the need to enforce a section of federal code against making false statements to the government, without mentioning who might be targeted.

“You have spent a year and a half and millions of taxpayers’ dollars conducting this investigat­ion,” wrote McCarthy, who rejected a committee request to testify because he spoke with Trump on Jan. 6. “It is imperative that all informatio­n collected be preserved not just for institutio­nal prerogativ­es but for transparen­cy to the American people.”

Thompson dismissed GOP complaints that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., hadn’t done enough to protect the Capitol. “That’s a dog whistle,” Thompson said.

Possible criminal charges

The committee pursued its investigat­ion independen­t of the Justice Department, which has charged more than 800 participan­ts in the riot. But the committee could recommend the pursuit of criminal charges against Trump or other officials, or civil complaints against lawyers who aided Trump.

Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel, Jack Smith, on Nov. 18 aiming for an independen­t perspectiv­e on potential criminal charges after Trump declared his candidacy three days earlier.

Trump issued a statement saying he had done nothing wrong. He called Smith a “fully weaponized monster” who would persecute him politicall­y.

Committee members said all the evidence they gathered will be released when the report is done, after redactions for personal identifier­s or those that jeopardize someone’s security, Schiff told CNN. Thompson also said arrangemen­ts were made with some witnesses not to release their statements.

“There’s been some assertion that the committee is not going to, you know, produce informatio­n about the security failures. That’s just simply not true. It’ll be a comprehens­ive report.”

Vice Chair Liz Cheney, R-Wyo.

They ‘cheated’ history

The committee sought testimony from Trump and Pence, but the panel ran out of time to compel testimony through federal courts.

Thompson said it would have been valuable for Trump to verify or deny testimony from other witnesses.

“He had an opportunit­y to come before the committee, tell his side. He chose not to,” Thompson said.

Pence was pressured by Trump to help overturn the election and became a target of the mob, whose members erected a gallows outside the Capitol and chanted “Hang Mike Pence” while rampaging through the building. But while previous presidents and vice presidents have testified voluntaril­y before Congress, Pence decided against cooperatin­g with the committee.

Because the committee expires at the end of the year, said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., it doesn’t have time to compel testimony from Trump or Pence through civil litigation.

“But I think they’ve cheated history, and they should have done otherwise,” Lofgren said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

 ?? ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES ??
ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES
 ?? ?? Thompson
Thompson
 ?? ?? Raskin
Raskin

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States