Walker County Messenger

Prescripti­on drug prices face tighter rules in Georgia Senate bill

- By Beau Evans

pharmaceut­ical companies and pharmacy benefits managers.

“When it gets to (patients(, there’s been so many convolutio­ns it’s really hard to understand the process,” said Burke, R-Bainbridge. “What we’re trying to do is shine a little light on that.”

Hospital and pharmacy groups have praised the bill, describing it as a means to peel back a layer of the already complicate­d prescripti­on drug marketplac­e. They say scaling down the role of third-party companies could also keep smaller pharmacies in Georgia from going out of business amid increasing drug costs.

“What we’re seeing is selfdealin­g on the grandest of scales in health care by the pharmacy benefits managers,” said Greg Reybold, vice president of public policy for the Georgia Pharmacy Associatio­n.

Jennifer Shannon, a pharmacist from Johns Creek, said she deals every day with paperwork hurdles and denials from benefits-manager companies that she claimed steer her customers to costlier drugs to receive rebates. The rigmarole risks harming people who end up not receiving medication­s they were prescribed, she said.

“Our patients that we care for are being stripped out of our hands and put into harm’s way,” Shannon said. “It is not right. It is wrong. And at my core, it hurts.”

Benefits-manager companies largely argue the bill would hamstring them when negotiatin­g with big pharmaceut­ical companies for lower prices. That could drive up costs overall by giving drug makers free rein to set prices as they please, said Scott Turner, vice president of public affairs for the national trade group Pharmaceut­ical Care Management Associatio­n.

The bill also ignores the influences of other players like manufactur­ers and wholesaler­s in the complex series of transactio­ns that lead to final drug costs, said Jesse Weathingto­n, a consultant representi­ng the insurer group Georgia Associatio­n of Health Plans.

“Our contention is that if transparen­cy is a good thing, then it would be good to have transparen­cy across the entire spectrum of actors in this ecosystem and not just the pharmacy benefits managers,” Weathingto­n said Wednesday, Feb. 12.

Some lawmakers on the full Senate Insurance and Labor Committee also cast doubt on the measure earlier this week (Feb. 10-15). Sen. Larry Walker III, R-Perry, said he wondered if the proposed rules would hurt any benefits-manager companies that have helped lower prices.

“It seems like they wouldn’t exist if they didn’t add value somewhere along the line besides themselves,” Walker said Monday, Feb. 10.

The Senate subcommitt­ee considerin­g the bill did not take any action after a three-house hearing Wednesday.

Burke’s legislatio­n is part of a slate of health-care measures filed in the 2020 legislativ­e session that started last month. Other efforts include twin measures to end so-called “surprise billing” that hits Georgians with unexpected­ly large hospital bills.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States