Washington County Enterprise-Leader

Making World Safe For Trust Fund Babies

- Chuck Collins CHUCK COLLINS IS A SENIOR SCHOLAR AT THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES AND CO-EDITOR OF WWW.INEQUALITY.ORG. HE IS CO-AUTHOR, WITH BILL GATES SR., OF WEALTH AND OUR COMMONWEAL­TH: WHY AMERICA SHOULD TAX ACCUMULATE­D FORTUNES.

Real wages have stagnated for decades. Homeowners­hip rates are down. College debt is weighing down young people entering the workforce. Millions of low-wage workers eke by on a minimum wage of $7.25 an hour.

As the American Dream slips away for millions of people in this country, one faction of Congress is doing its best to aid a select group of folks that least needs a helping hand: trust fund babies.

More than 222 House members — nearly all of them Republican­s — have co-sponsored legislatio­n to abolish America’s inheritanc­e tax, a levy that only applies to the estates of multi-millionair­es and billionair­es.

Technicall­y called the estate tax, and derided by its opponents as the “death tax,” this part of the tax code affects only one out of every 500 Americans.

If Congress abolishes it, the already wealthy will gain the privilege of passing unlimited inheritanc­es to their children once they die. Scrapping it would rip a $210 billion hole in the federal budget over the next decade, according to the Tax Policy Center.

The lawmakers determined to kill the inheritanc­e tax go out of their way to hide the facts and pose as populists.

Take Representa­tive Kevin Brady, a Texas Republican and lead sponsor of repeal legislatio­n. He circulates advertisem­ents with two young farm kids next to a pickup truck with the caption, “The Death Tax crushes family farms, ranches and businesses.”

And a Kentucky PAC spent $1.8 million airing a TV ad featuring a farmer who bemoans the burden of the inheritanc­e tax and praises Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (The farmer, John Mahan of Lexington, did not complain about the $405,692 in federal farm subsidies he received between 1995 and 2012).

The inheritanc­e tax “continues to be the number one reason family- owned farms and businesses aren’t passed down to the next generation,” Brady recently (and wrongly) claimed.

It’s hard to fathom how a tax that 99.8 percent of households don’t pay could be a bigger threat to farmers than volatile farm prices and competitio­n from corporate agribusine­ss. But don’t bank on opponents of the inheritanc­e tax letting the facts muddle their political agenda.

As a strong supporter of the inheritanc­e tax, I’ve seen this playbook before. Between 1996 and 2004, America’s plutocrats, including the Walton and Mars families, invested millions in a propaganda campaign designed to save themselves billions.

They plastered the media with images of farm families, alleging that the inheritanc­e tax would be the “death of the family farm.”

The only problem was, when pressed by Pulitzer Prize winning reporter David Cay Johnston, foes of the estate tax couldn’t produce a single example of an actual farm lost because of the inheritanc­e tax. It was a complete myth.

Congress wound up weakening the tax in 2001, when opponents failed to abolish it. Now this tired debate is back, with those phony farm images and fake populism.

Here’s what really matters: Couples with less than $10.6 million in wealth are exempt from the inheritanc­e tax. So are individual­s with wealth under $5.3 million.

The inheritanc­e tax is important because the very richest Americans already benefit from enormous loopholes that enable them to pay taxes at rates lower than average workers. The inheritanc­e tax levels the playing field.

And the huge family fortunes now being passed on to the next generation are creating a new wave of American aristocrat­s.

Who are the real faces of the inheritanc­e tax? Try the sons and daughters of the billionair­es who make the Forbes 400 list, standing next to their family limousines.

There is a real problem with the inheritanc­e tax: Billionair­es are paying expensive lawyers to weasel out of paying it. Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, for example, used a system of trusts to funnel $8 billion in wealth to his heirs.

Instead of abolishing the inheritanc­e tax, lawmakers should focus on closing the loopholes that empower the richest Americans to legally dodge it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States