Washington County Enterprise-Leader

Pulling Plank On Pre-K Could Hurt GOP Slate

- Maylon Rice MAYLON RICE, AN AWARDWINNI­NG COLUMNIST, HAS WRITTEN BOTH NEWS AND COLUMNS FOR SEVERAL NWA PUBLICATIO­NS AND HAS BEEN WRITING FOR THE ENTERPRISE­LEADER FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

Recently, the Republ i can Pa r ty of Arkansas — meeting in what normally is a post-convention Presidenti­al Pep Rally — turned to mundane housekeepi­ng items such as fine-turning a party platform for the upcoming election cycle.

That party platform is a laundry-list, if you will, of what the typical GOP candidate and Republican voter believe and support.

One of those mundane issues removed from the Party platform, the funding of pre- kindergart­en programs in Arkansas, has now, it seems, created a firestorm of public criticism and confusion.

On Monday, following the Saturday meeting, Gov. Asa Hutchinson issued the following statement:

“Last Saturday, delegates of the state party voted to remove a provision in the platform which was confusing and unclear on its intent on pre-K funding. This action does not affect the historical bi-partisan support of pre- K funding.”

“Prior to last year, pre- K funding in the state had not seen an increase in funding since the program’s inception in 2003. My first year in office, we appropriat­ed $3 million in new funds for pre-K and additional funding was secured from federal sources. Arkansas currently ranks 12th in the nation in terms of percent of 4-year-old children in state-funded pre-K.”

State House Minority Leader John Michael Gray, D-Augusta, told one Arkansas media outlet of his disapprova­l of the move.

“I am hopeful that as the governor continues to look at the data, he’ll see that this is about the future of Arkansas, and that we make a long-term commitment to the future of the children and not just one- time money,” Gray said. “I’m encouraged by conversati­ons I’ve had with him. However, we went down to the last day of the fiscal session trying for any kind of pre- K increase in conversati­ons with the governor’s office and none of it materializ­ed.”

Gray had earlier tried to get $10 million in additional funding for pre-K in the last legislativ­e session.

Local state House member Charlene Fite, a Republican serving District 80 (parts of Washington and Crawford counties) and a retired public school educator responded to my questions about the pre-K plank being pulled.

“I wasn’t at Saturday’s meeting, but have talked to many who were. There was a confusing amendment to the educationa­l plank of the party platform. Many delegates interprete­d the language as supporting mandatory preschool for all Arkansas children, with the accompanyi­ng mandatory funding. The delegates were concerned about making preschool mandatory and removing parental choice,” Fite wrote.

“They were also troubled by what this mandate would do to the rest of the state education budget. Therefore, this language was removed from the party platform.” She stressed this item. “This in no way means the Republican Party doesn’t support preschool education. The governor and the legislatur­e increased preschool funding in the last legislativ­e session and have already announced plans to do so in the next.

“Republican­s have been in charge of the governorsh­ip and state legislatur­e for one session. I find it fascinatin­g that if Democrats were so committed to fully funding preschool education, they didn’t do so during their many years in power. I believe this action at the state party convention has been seized upon to use as a political wedge.”

State Rep. Greg Leding of Fayettevil­le, a Democrat serving House District 86, said: “Education is everything, and the sooner you start, the more successful our children can be. It doesn’t say much about Republican­s’ regard for our kids, education, or working families when they go and strike all support for pre-K.”

State Rep. Robin Lundstrum, a Republican serv- ing House District 87 (which includes parts of western Springdale and Siloam Springs) said the key word was “mandatory.”

“We don’t want to have mandates and unfunded mandates on the taxpayers. Pre- K programs are already in place. There is much ado about this wording and not enough about how to pay for it.”

So now office holders on both political sides will have to speak up on their pre-K priorities.

Some will say, well, it’s about time.

“This in no way means the Republican Party doesn’t support preschool education. The governor and the legislatur­e increased preschool funding in the last legislativ­e session and have already announced plans to do so in the next.” CHARLENE FITE ARKANSAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTA­TIVES, R-DISTRICT 80

“Education is everything, and the sooner you start, the more successful our children can be. It doesn’t say much about Republican­s’ regard for our kids, education, or working families when they go and strike all support for pre-K.” Greg Leding ARKANSAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTA­TIVES, D-DISTRICT 86

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States