Washington County Enterprise-Leader

Keeping My ‘Jaw’ In Line

- Gene Linzey Reflection­s on Life

On July 23, 2014, I wrote an article titled “Trouble With Jaws.” In that Reflection, I said, “Although I knew my belt had slowly been getting tighter, I was surprised on May 18 to find that I weighed 182 pounds. I am five feet, eight inches tall with my shoes on, and I shouldn’t weigh more than 165.”

We had been in California from December of 2013 through February of 2014, and my brother fed us well!

I told Carol, “Precious, I am disgusted!”

“What’s the matter?”

“I am having trouble with my jaws.”

“What do you mean?” “My jaws are processing too much food and my tummy is revealing the consequenc­es.”

Laughing, she asked, “Are you going on a diet?”

“No, and yes. No: I’m not going on a traditiona­l diet that people make and break 12 times a year. And Yes: I am going to count calories.”

And so I did. The weight calculator said my caloric intake should not exceed 1,948 calories daily, so I decided on 1,950 calories for easier figuring. If I went over one day, I stayed under the next day. I started limiting calories — not food types, but caloric intake — on May 18, 2014; and five weeks later, I was down to 160. My plan worked. Ice cream, pies and cookies were part of my diet, but in limited quantities, and only after a hearty — not large, but hearty — meal.

If you want to know: My daily caloric intake for the five weeks averaged 1,713.

That was five years ago. But as you know, we recently returned from a prolonged road-trip around our grand country; and guess what? My belt slowly but surely got tighter. When we returned home May 16, the scale lied: it said I weighed 191 pounds! Not to be outsmarted, I replaced the battery and the truth was revealed: my true weight was 182 — again. I remembered that tried-andtrue regimen, and I decided to count calories — again. Because I’m five years older, the weight calculator wants to limit me to 1,916 calories daily.

Limiting calories while sitting on the couch or at the computer helps only a little. So in addition to sitting at my desk writing, I’ve been working. I haven’t the time to go to the gym; I’m already working out — outside, that is.

As I work at tree-trimming, shredding the limbs, weed-whacking around our half-acre, mowing the lawns, burning branches, ridding the premises of unwanted vegetation, it wouldn’t matter if I went over on the caloric intake because I’m burning it off. Neverthele­ss, I’m keeping track and keeping Jaws under control. Or is it keeping my over-eating under control?

Either way, I’ll get the weight down to a healthy level — again.

I eat mashed potatoes and gravy, hamburgers and steak. I just won’t over-eat. Yes — milk-shakes, ice cream, pies and cookies are still in! But in limited quantities.

I’m not a vegetarian, but I find myself asking for more fruit and vegetables, and I’ve lost interest in some foods that are low on nutrition. I already feel better and I have more energy.

By the way: I will not LOSE the weight because I know where it will be hiding: It’ll be in the refrigerat­or, the food pantry, and at my favorite restaurant­s. The key is discipline.

Our next short adventures are to Dallas this month to see our newest grandbaby, and to Pagosa Springs, Colo., to be with our daughters. I will be down to my desired 160 pounds before then, and I’ll make sure I don’t overeat.

Well, I might need to retract that statement. I catch plenty of 16- to 18-inch rainbow trout up there, and I tend to over-eat on fish. However, wild trout has between 202-270 calories for a 6-ounce fillet (depends on how it’s cooked). Compare that with approximat­ely 394 for six ounces of hamburger, and approximat­ely 400 for steak. And fish meat is obviously healthier for us.

It is not difficult to reduce waist-line and weight. You just have to want to — and use my plan: It works.

Bon appétit, mes amies.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States