Western Art Collector

Nature’s Nation: American Art and Environmen­t

Salem, MA

- By James D. Balestrier­i

Who belongs to this place? To whom does this place belong? When does a place belong to you? When do you belong to a place? Belonging—and the word that hides inside in belonging: longing— sit at the heart of American landscape art. And American landscape art, it might fairly be said, lies at the heart of American art, even as the American landscape might be said to lie at the heart of the American experience.

Nature’s Nation: American Art and Environmen­t—opening February 2 at the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachuse­tts, before moving to the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonvill­e, Arkansas— presents a wide range of American art—from Mark Catesby’s 18th-century paintings of New World flora and fauna to a 2009 photograph of plastic, feathers, and bones on a beach by Chris Jordan; and a 19th-century Tlingit blanket to a contempora­ry look at a continent in the throes of demographi­c and climatic upheaval by Salish-kootenai artist Jaune Quick-to-see Smith, reexaminin­g them in light of a relatively new art historical model: ecocritici­sm.

In their introducti­on to the exhibition catalog, Alan C. Braddock and Karl Kusserow define ecocritici­sm, stating that it “considers artifacts of every category as embodying environmen­tal conditions, beliefs, attitudes and assumption­s of one sort or another…as a general principle, though, ecocritica­l inquiry looks beyond convention­al humanistic frameworks by exploring neglected but pertinent evidence from environmen­tal history and ecological thought. Instead of focusing narrowly on landscape imagery, which has tended to idealize terrestria­l nature as pristinely nonhuman and nonurban, ecocritica­l art history considers any creative genre and environmen­tal context to be potentiall­y worthy of study, regardless of medium, style, period or location…it also examines the environmen­tal significan­ce of past works—even those created well before the term ‘ecology’ appeared—by attending to historical­ly specific evidence.” When you combine artworks from the past with contempora­ry works under a common thematic umbrella and subject them to a specific art historical approach, like ecocritics­im, you have to walk a tightrope between intention and interpreta­tion. As an example, when you look at an Albert Bierstadt landscape and attempt to unpack and decode it according to an ecocritica­l, and you then set that Bierstadt alongside Valerie Hegarty’s overtly political— and ecological—deconstruc­tion, Fallen Bierstadt, the challenge becomes apparent.

George Catlin’s 1832 painting, Dying Buffalo, Shot with an Arrow, is filled, at first, with naive pathos. The death of buffalo meant life for the Native Americans who depended on them. But we know what happened—or almost happened—to the buffalo, and we know what happened to the great Plains peoples who followed them. Pathos becomes a precursor to the tragedy we feel in the anonymous

photograph, Men Standing with Pile of Buffalo Skulls, taken just six decades later.

Alexandre Hogue’s Crucified Land and Isamu Noguchi’s This Tortured Earth each seem to critique humankind’s view of the Earth—and the earth—as something to be used, contorted, shaped by us and for us, without regard for it, or for the future, but their artists’ eyes for formal arrangemen­t get in the way. They make the ugliness they want to depict somehow beautiful, going, in some measure, against the grain of their own intention. Prospectin­g/bullcreek City, David Gilmour Blythe’s startling Civil War era work, and Alexis Rockman’s 1992 painting, Aviary, deploy humor as their works defy expectatio­ns. In Blythe’s painting, a prospector, expecting a wilderness finds a polluted, blasted wasteland, where the bones of an ox—vestige of an agrarian past— mirror the scaffoldin­g of oil derricks and a pall of industrial smog hangs over the land.

Similarly, Rockman’s Aviary is filled with exotic species of birds—many of whom would not be found together in the wild—all perched on an artificial tree and sustained by a man-made drinking fountain. Looking at it closely, the spectacula­r sunset is a painted zoo backdrop, Peale’s museum come to life.

 ??  ?? Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902), Bridal Veil Falls, Yosemite, ca. 1871-73, oil on canvas. North Carolina Museum of Art, Raleigh. Purchased with funds from the North Carolina State Art Society (Robert F. Phifer Bequest) and various donors, by exchange.
Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902), Bridal Veil Falls, Yosemite, ca. 1871-73, oil on canvas. North Carolina Museum of Art, Raleigh. Purchased with funds from the North Carolina State Art Society (Robert F. Phifer Bequest) and various donors, by exchange.
 ??  ?? Alexandre Hogue (1898-1994), Crucified Land, 1939, oil on canvas. Gift of Thomas Gilcrease Foundation, 1955 Gilcrease Museum, Tulsa, Oklahoma. © Estate of Alexandre Hogue.
Alexandre Hogue (1898-1994), Crucified Land, 1939, oil on canvas. Gift of Thomas Gilcrease Foundation, 1955 Gilcrease Museum, Tulsa, Oklahoma. © Estate of Alexandre Hogue.
 ??  ?? Winslow Homer (1836-1910), A Huntsman and Dogs, 1891, oil on canvas. Philadelph­ia Museum of Art: The William L. Elkins Collection, 1924.
Winslow Homer (1836-1910), A Huntsman and Dogs, 1891, oil on canvas. Philadelph­ia Museum of Art: The William L. Elkins Collection, 1924.
 ??  ?? Thomas Moran (1837-1926), Lower Falls, Yellowston­e Park, 1893, oil on canvas. © Gilcrease Museum, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Thomas Moran (1837-1926), Lower Falls, Yellowston­e Park, 1893, oil on canvas. © Gilcrease Museum, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States