Call & Times

WHA board ousts Moreau as director

Following months-long probe, Housing Authority terminates employment of Robert Moreau

- By STELLA LORENCE slorence@woonsocket­call.com

WOONSOCKET – Former Woonsocket Housing Authority Executive Director

Robert Moreau’s contract and employment were terminated by the WHA’s Board of Commission­ers during a special meeting Thursday night, after an independen­t law firm found he had demonstrat­ed “disturbing failures” while filling the role.

The Board voted 6-0 to terminate Moreau’s employment agreement, which itself was a subject of the investigat­ion, and 5-1 to terminate his employment at WHA, with Vice Chair Steven D’Agostino as the dissenting vote.

Moreau had been on paid administra­tive leave for almost six months following a letter from the accounting firm Marcum, that highlighte­d three instances of alleged wrongdoing involving Moreau and two other senior WHA employees, who were also placed on leave. In response to that letter, the board hired the law firm Whelan Corrente & Flanders LLP to conduct an independen­t investigat­ion into “alleged financial irregulari­ties,” which was released on March 17.

“These failures were characteri­zed by a near-complete disregard for [U.S. Department

of Housing and Urban Developmen­t] policies and WHA rules, regulation­s, and budgets, coupled with senior leaders’ repeated disavowal of any responsibi­lity and deflection of blame to others,” according to the report.

Robert Corrente, the attorney who prepared the report, declined to comment, as he is

still investigat­ing some additional incidents that “came to

light” during the first investigat­ion. He confirmed that the

Board of Commission­ers voted to allow him to continue the investigat­ion.

Both Corrente’s report and the Marcum audit allege Moreau and then-Security Director Roger Biron, now on leave, knew they were overspendi­ng on a contract to provide additional 24/7 security to the authority’s properties but failed to inform the Board and HUD.

The report goes on to accuse Moreau of deliberate­ly “misreprese­nting” his knowledge of the cost of the security contract when he wrote to the HUD in May 2021 requesting retroactiv­e relief for the costs. WHA

overspend on the security contract by over $600,000, though the Marcum audit and Corrente’s report have a $24,588 discrepanc­y in the total payments to the security firm.

Moreau, who requested the meeting take place in open session, defended his actions in a statement before the board Thursday night.

“I was the person who shined a light on the fact that we went over the [private security firm] NES contract,” Moreau said. “If I was engaged in any wrongdoing, I would not be writing to HUD to highlight it. From my perspectiv­e, we – and I put we in bold in my notes, meaning not just me, but Procuremen­t, Finance and others – made a harmless mistake in not catching the issue sooner. Why do I say harmless? Because no matter what the cost was, we needed the security 24 hours a day, seven days a week to keep these residents safe from getting sick and keeping them alive.”

The audit and the investigat­ion also took issue with Moreau’s own administra­tive contract. When Moreau became the permanent executive director in December 2018 (after serving for six months as acting executive director), he signed a three-year contract, which was “the subject of detailed discussion and negotiatio­ns” with the Board of Commission­ers, according to Corrente’s report. The contract was accepted in January of 2019.

Less than a year later, in December of 2019, the board approved a new contract, which included a new three-year term with two automatic three-year renewals for a potential total of nine years. Under current HUD regulation­s, public housing authority directors cannot serve terms longer than five years.

Moreau said he drafted the new contract to restart the three-year cycle so he could continue working at the WHA, and that he followed the same process in presenting his draft to the board in 2019 as he did with his original contract in 2018.

“That I wanted to stay as long as possible is now being turned around on me, as if there is something wrong with that,” Moreau said. “From my perspectiv­e, there is nothing wrong with loving your job and wanting to keep it as long as you can. It is important for you to know that nothing about the 2019 agreement to start fresh was a secret.”

Corrente’s investigat­ion, however, alleges that the December 2019 meeting when the board approved the new contract was the first time any of the commission­ers saw it, and that there was no discussion or negotiatio­n. At least two commission­ers were under the impression they were approving a contract for a shorter term than they really were, according to Corrente’s investigat­ion.

Moreau also alleged that Mayor Lisa Baldelli-Hunt called several commission­ers between December 2018 and January 2019 and asked them not to appoint Moreau as director.

Baldelli-Hunt said she thought Moreau was referring to his original 2018 contract, when he was made permanent executive director rather than acting executive director. She said that at the time, she had suggested that the commission­ers post the job opening before appointing Moreau, and that even though it could have ended in the same outcome, she thought it important to post the opening and see who responded.

The new 2019 contract also gave Moreau, rather than the WHA, the option to renew, and stipulated that a “for cause” terminatio­n would require unanimous rather than majority approval from board. The “for cause” provisions in this contract were the subject of lengthy procedural discussion­s at Thursday’s meeting.

Because of the structure of the agreement, the board took two separate votes to end Moreau’s employment at the WHA. The first was to uphold four charges of wrongdoing, as supported by the evidence in Corrente’s report and Moreau’s testimony before the board, which constitute­d “cause” as defined in Moreau’s employment agreement to terminate the agreement itself. The four charges of wrongdoing correspond­ed to the findings of Corrente’s investigat­ion and the Marcum audit.

The board discussed and voted on each of the charges independen­tly, determinin­g whether the evidence they’d been presented in Corrente’s investigat­ion report and Moreau’s statement was strong enough to support terminatin­g the agreement, before voting on a resolution that grouped them together into a single action.

“Do I feel bad about it? Yes, I do,” Chairman Michael Houle told The Call. “But everything was supported by physical evidence. Everything we’ve done is based on facts.”

The second vote was to end Moreau’s employment at WHA, as it’s possible to remain an employee without an employment agreement. The board offered no discussion, and D’Agostino voted against ending Moreau’s employment.

The third instance of noncomplia­nce found in the Marcum audit and addressed in Corrente’s investigat­ion was a series of “merit” payroll increases awarded improperly to Biron and Human Resources Director Katrina Lapierre, currently on leave.

These raises went unapproved by the board and HUD, violating WHA and HUD policy, and caused the WHA to exceed its payroll budget, Corrente’s investigat­ion found.

Moreau said he never had to get permission from the board or HUD to award raises, and defended the reasons for awarding them to Biron and Lapierre, which had to do with extra work they each took on.

“In my 13 years, I was never trained to have wage rates, or any other compensati­on decisions, approved by HUD,” Moreau said. “Before you discipline someone for something, it is important to know whether that person was aware of the rule or was trained in how something should have been done.”

Moreau’s attorney, Carly Iafrate, said they will have to look at all their options, which may include going to court to seek enforcemen­t of Moreau’s contract.

“Obviously there was an employment agreement in place we think was enforceabl­e,” Iafrate said.

Current acting executive director Visiliki “Celia” Milios declined to comment, saying she has “no idea” what comes next for the WHA and that she thought everyone was “emotionall­y drained” after the three-hour meeting.

Biron’s hearing before the board takes place on Thursday, and Lapierre’s has not been scheduled yet, according to Houle.

 ?? ??
 ?? Photo by Ernest A. Brown ?? The Woonsocket Housing Authority building, located at 679 Social St., pictured recently.
Photo by Ernest A. Brown The Woonsocket Housing Authority building, located at 679 Social St., pictured recently.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States