WWD Digital Daily

Nike Must Face Retail Workers’ Suit Over Pay For Bag Checks

- BY SINDHU SUNDAR

Nike Inc. must still face a class action of current and former retail employees in California over whether the company should pay them for time spent off the clock submitting to bag checks.

The Ninth Circuit appeals court on Friday revived the lawsuit against Nike Retail Services Inc., after a lower federal court in California ruled in 2017 that the time it took to do the checks wasn't long enough on a regular basis to potentiall­y be compensate­d.

The appeals court disagreed with the lower court, saying there was some evidence that most of the inspection­s took long enough, and that there is a legitimate dispute about whether this could be paid time. Nike and the employees in the suit have clashed about how long these checks actually take.

“We cannot conclude that exit inspection­s qualify as ‘split-second absurditie­s,'” the Ninth Circuit wrote in its opinion Friday. “Nor do they appear so ‘irregular that it is unreasonab­le to expect the time to be recorded.'”

The case involves the practice at nearly three dozen Nike stores in California, where hourly employees have to undergo bag, or box, or visual checks, which retailers have said they do as a precaution against theft. The employees have to go through these checks when they leave the store during breaks and after their shifts, according to court documents.

Nike had trotted out an expert who studied inspection times in the case and said they took fewer than about 20 seconds each time. The plaintiffs' expert disagreed with that assessment, saying it relied on too small a sample size and that it appeared to discount the time that employees spent waiting to go through the checks. Even Nike store managers had said in deposition­s these exit inspection­s often lasted several minutes, the plaintiffs pointed out.

“We are pleased with the Ninth Circuit's ruling, and will continue to prosecute the

The Ninth Circuit appeals court on Friday revived a class action by current and former Nike retail employees in California.

case in accordance with California law,” said Max Gavron, an attorney for the employees, said in a statement Monday.

A representa­tive for Nike couldn't immediatel­y be reached for comment Monday.

The suit had been filed in 2014 by plaintiff Isaac Rodriguez, a former employee in one of Nike's retail stores in California. About two years later, a federal court certified a class of current and former hourly Nike retail employees in California since February 2010, according to court filings.

 ??  ?? A street view of the Nike store on Melrose Avenue.
A street view of the Nike store on Melrose Avenue.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States