WWII Fighters

Flying the FW 190

A legend gets checked out in the Butcher Bird

- BY CAPT. ERIC BROWN | PHOTO BY JOHN DIBBS/FACEBOOK.COM/THEPLANEPI­CTURE

In the fall of 1937, the Technical Department of the German Air Ministry decided to develop a replacemen­t for the Messerschm­itt 109. At the end of the year, after discussion­s with Focke-Wulf’s chief designer Kurt Tank, the Air Ministry awarded a contract to the company. The Ministry specified the need for a fighter whose performanc­e would be significan­tly better than that of both the 109 and the British Spitfire.

Tank realized that he would require the most powerful engine available to him, and this requiremen­t clearly pointed him toward the 18-cylinder, two-row radial BMW 139, which offered 325 more horsepower than its nearest rival, the 12-cylinder, in-line, liquid-cooled DB 601. This decision surprised Luftwaffe officials but was accepted because of the uncertaint­y of the future supply of the Daimler-Benz engine (which had previously been projected as the powerplant for the 109 fighter, the twin-engine Me 110, Arado 240 fighter, and several other combat aircraft). The Focke-Wulf design team began with certain definite ideas: They would need a strong, wide-track landing gear, both to withstand the vertical velocity required of the new fighter/bomber and also to avoid the severe directiona­l control problems that plagued the 109 during takeoffs and landings. Tank also declared that when he was a soldier in WW I, he had learned that military equipment must be simple, robust, reliable, and easy to maintain. He was determined to apply those standards to the new aircraft—designatio­n “FW 190.”

It is interestin­g that Tank, who was also a director of Focke-Wulf, was a famous test pilot of his aircraft during WW II. Throughout this article, you’ll notice where his understand­ing of the real-life requiremen­ts of hard-pressed combat pilots produced superior designs of cockpits, visibility from the cockpit, landing gear, control harmonies, and automatic systems—to name just a few areas in which he excelled. With all of his designs, his test-pilot experience allowed him to work toward the reduction of the combat pilot’s load as far as possible. Powered by a fan-cooled 1,550hp BMW 139, the prototype’s first flight took place at Bremen airfield on June 1, 1939. It had a special ducted spinner to reduce drag, but its engine was soon found to be prone to

overheatin­g, so the ducted spinner was replaced by a new—and unique—snugly fitting NACA cowl with a cooling fan geared to the propeller in the front of the cowl. BMW was already test-running a new engine—the 14-cylinder BMW 801—that was some 20 inches (50cm) longer, and 180 pounds heavier, and produced 100hp more than the BMW 139. At this point, Focke-Wulf decided to concentrat­e on this newer engine.

The installati­on of the BMW 801 required some considerab­le modificati­ons to the FW 190’s basic airframe. The cockpit had to be moved farther aft to compensate for the forward shift in the center of gravity. Although this shrank the cockpit, it provided more space up front for fuselage armament. The increase in weight also had to be compensate­d for by an increase in wingspan and wing area. This change cost only a 6mph (10km/h) loss in speed, but it improved the rate of climb and reduced the turning circle. After successful flights at Rechlin Test Center, the German Air Ministry ordered 100 production FW 190A-1s.

The FW 190A-1 was a small, low-wing monoplane powered by a 1,660hp BMW 801C-1 radial neatly faired into its slim fuselage, and its extensivel­y glazed cockpit canopy afforded an excellent all-around view. The aircraft was built of metal, had a stressed Duralumin skin, and was armed with four .30-caliber (7.9mm) machine guns. It was introduced to full-squadron service in March 1941, and on September 27, it clashed with Spitfire Vs for the first time and showed its superiorit­y in all respects except turning combat.

In January 1942, the FW 190A-2 became operationa­l with the improved BMW 801C-2 engine, two .30-caliber (7.9mm) machine guns cowled above the engine, and two 20mm cannon in the wing roots. Two more .30-caliber (7.9mm) machine guns were often carried in the outboard wing panels.

The first major production variant was the A-3; it was powered by the 1,700hp BMW 801D-2, and the 20mm MG FF cannon that had been in the wing root was replaced by the much faster firing MG 151/20mm cannon, which was moved outboard of the propeller arc. The pilot had more armor

protection, and the cockpit canopy could be jettisoned while in flight with the aid of explosive bolts. The A-3 was a multipurpo­se aircraft and was produced in fighter, fighter/ bomber, reconnaiss­ance, torpedo/bomber, and ground-attack variants. It entered service in March 1942, by which time more than 250 FW 190s were being produced monthly. From October 1942 to March 1943, 72 A-3s were handed over to Turkey.

As the FW 190 consolidat­ed its superiorit­y over its Royal Air Force (RAF) contempora­ries, the morale of Spitfire V squadron pilots was inevitably affected.

The British Air Ministry’s concern about the situation soon bordered on desperatio­n, and it planned a commando raid on a Luftwaffe fighter base in France to hijack a FW 190. Then fortune favored the Allies when, at 2035 hours on June 23, 1942, a Luftwaffe pilot—after a brief encounter with Spitfires over the English Channel—became disoriente­d and landed his FW 190A-3 at RAF Pembrey in South Wales and not on what he assumed was a German airfield on the Cherbourg peninsula. Owing to the RAF Air Traffic Control’s smart thinking, the pilot was left undisturbe­d to taxi in and stop his engine before a controller leapt onto the FW’s wing and held a flare pistol to his head. Unbelievab­ly, an intact example of the enemy’s latest fighter was in RAF hands.

The A-3 was transporte­d to the

Royal Aircraft Establishm­ent (RAE) at Farnboroug­h, where both the airframe and the engine were dismantled and thoroughly analyzed before being reassemble­d for 10 days of flight testing, starting on July 3. The flight tests confirmed that the FW 190 was a truly outstandin­g combat aircraft with a very high rate of roll and impressive accelerati­on in the dive. Its Achilles’ heel was in its violent accelerate­d stall that could lead to a spin if it tried to outturn the Spitfire. The tests also revealed that, above 25,000 feet, the newer Spitfire IX could outperform the FW 190. This informatio­n was, of course, rapidly transmitte­d to all Allied operationa­l fighter units; it was evident that the FW

190 pilots preferred to fight by climbing and diving while the Allied fighters were well advised to stick to level turning combat. In late summer 1942, the FW 190A-4 appeared equipped with the MW-50 water/ methanol injection system that could boost the BMW 801D-2 engine to 2,100hp for short periods. This was two years before production U.S. fighters had water-injection systems. This variant also had better radio equipment, which necessitat­ed the installati­on of a short radio mast on top of the fin.

My Flight Testing of the FW 190A-4 Begins

In the months of April, May, and June 1943, during night operations, three more FW 190A-4s landed at airfields in southeast England, and it was in one of these that I did most of the flight testing of this type at RAE Farnboroug­h. I clearly recall the excitement with which I first examined Kurt Tank’s masterpiec­e, which he himself called the Würger (“butcher bird”); its functional yet pleasing lines exuded an elegant lethality. It sat high on the ground, and although the landing gear appeared to be extraordin­arily long, the forward view was still rather better than that from contempora­ry fighters. The somewhat narrow cockpit had a semireclin­ing seat—ideal for high-G maneuvers— and the controls fell easily to hand. In general, the cockpit layout was good. The engine was controlled by an ingenious, advanced Kommandoge­rät—a sort of electronic brain box that greatly relieved the pilot’s responsibi­lity to control airscrew pitch (rpm), fuel mixture, and engine boost (throttle) in combat. In addition, the engine’s two-speed supercharg­er shifted automatica­lly at about 21,000 feet, and control of the important oil-cooler flaps was automatic, thus relieving the pilot of two more major cockpit duties. The pilot needed only to keep his hand on the throttle and his eye on his assailant. In the heat of combat, it was easy for an Allied fighter pilot to forget to move one or both of the other two required controls if he needed immediate full power to beat his opponent.

The FW 190 also had electrical­ly controlled oil-cooler flaps, which had to be operated manually on most fighters. In the heat of combat, this feature—like the Kommandoge­rät—relieved the pilot of operating two more small, difficult-toaccess switches. This avoided the risk of engine burnout at the high power settings

combat required. It was a fighter pilot’s dream airplane.

The pilot was well protected from frontal attack by the engine and by the sharply sloped 2-inch (50mm) armored glass windscreen; from the rear, protection came from its shaped 3/8-inch (8mm) armored seatback, 1/2-inch (13mm) head-andshoulde­r armor, and 3/8-inch (8mm) plates above and below the seatback and on each side.

All the ancillary controls were electrical­ly actuated by an array of pushbutton­s, and a particular­ly fine feature of the cockpit was the outstandin­g view that it offered.

The BMW 801 was started by an inertia starter energized by a 24-volt external supply or by the aircraft’s own battery. The big radial was primed internally and almost invariably fired during the propeller’s first revolution; it purred smoothly as it ran. With the wide-track landing gear and good brakes, taxiing was easy—unusually so for a German aircraft—and this allowed the airplane to be swung from side to side so that the pilot could see what was ahead. Lining up for takeoff, I moved the stick aft to lock the tailwheel, applied 10 degrees of flap, and set the elevator trimmer to neutral and the propeller pitch to auto.

When I opened the throttle to 2,700rpm and 47 inches manifold pressure (23.5 pounds of boost), the torque swing to the left was easy to hold with the rudder. The length of the takeoff run was much the same as the Spitfire IX’s. Rotation speed was 112mph (180km/h), and after retracting the landing gear, the manifold pressure was reduced to 43 inches (21.3 pounds of boost). At 143mph (230km/h), the flaps were raised, and climb settings of 2,500rpm and 161mph (260km/h) gave a climb rate of 3,150 feet per minute (16 meters per second).

Remarkably, this fighter didn’t require retrimming for the various stages of flight; there wasn’t an aileron trimmer in the cockpit, but there was an external adjustable trim tab on each aileron that had to be preset on the ground. Decidedly, its most impressive features were its light ailerons and its extremely high rate of roll. It could do incredible aileron turns that would have torn the wings off a 109, and the ailerons maintained their lightness from the stall up to 400mph (645km/h) before becoming heavy.

The elevators proved to be moderately heavy at all speeds, particular­ly at above 350mph (565km/h), when they became heavy enough to impose a tactical restrictio­n with regard to pullout from lowlevel dives. This heaviness was accentuate­d because of the nose-down pitch that was evident at high speeds when trimmed for low speeds. The critical speed at which this change of trim happened was around 220mph (355km/h), and it could easily be gauged in turns. Below that speed, the FW 190 had a tendency to tighten up in a turn, but above 220mph, some backward stick pressure was required to hold the turn. Thus, in combat, the pilot had to be aware that if he dived on the enemy to get enough speed to follow him into a steep turn, he had to ensure that he didn’t lighten his initial pull force by using the trimmer. As speed fell off in the turn, he would have a sudden reversal of stick force that could tighten the turn so much that the plane would depart dramatical­ly into a spin. Most of the early FW 190 pilots were, however, too well trained to lose their cool to that extent in battle.

Rudder control proved positive and effective at low speeds, and I found it satisfacto­ry at high speeds; I seldom had to use it for any normal maneuver. It was when I assessed the three controls together rather than in isolation that I appreciate­d the FW 190’s magic as a fighter lay in its superb control harmony. A good dogfighter and a good gun platform called for just the characteri­stics that the German fighter had in all important aspects of stability and control. At the normal cruise speed of 330

mph (530km/h) at 8,000 feet (2,440m), stability was very good directiona­lly, but it was unstable laterally and neutral longitudin­ally—all very fine for a fighter, but it was not easy to fly on instrument­s; indeed, the all-weather variants were fitted with the Patin PKS 12 course-steering autopilot.

For landing, I reduced the speed to below 155mph (250km/h) and then applied 10 degrees of flap before lowering the landing gear. After turning on to the final approach, I applied full flap at 150mph (240km/h) and gradually eased the speed as I crossed the airfield boundary at 125mph (200km/h). The view on the approach was decidedly poor because the attitude with power on was flat, and unlike most of its contempora­ries, its cockpit canopy could not be opened because of the risk of contaminat­ion from engine exhaust fumes. Unless you made a perfect three-point touchdown, you’d have a somewhat bouncy arrival on the nonresilie­nt landing gear.

Variants of the FW 190A Series

Early in 1943, the FW 190A-5 appeared. It was essentiall­y similar to the A-4, but its revised engine mounting moved the engine 6 inches (15cm) farther forward. This opened up the area behind the engine, and allowed the cooling air to exit the engine faster and leave through the cooling gills on the side of the fuselage. The A-6 followed with a redesigned wing that was lighter and could take four 20mm cannon. In December 1943 came the A-7 with a slightly uprated engine, and this was followed by A-8 to A-10. Although many models and versions were designed, most of the FW 190s produced were A-3, A-4, and A-5 models.

There were many variants of the last six A-series 190s. Their difference­s were mainly in engine, armament, and radio equipment, but there were three unusual variants. In late 1943, a unit was equipped with specially armored FW 190A-6s that could ram enemy bombers; the A-8/U1 was a two-seat conversion trainer; and the A-8/U3 was adapted as the upper component fighter of the Mistel piggyback fighter/bomber combinatio­n. The Mistel’s lower component—a Ju 88 bomber—was flown by the pilot in the FW 190 as a large attached bomb until it was launched as a pilotless missile over the target. This combinatio­n was designed for the invasion of France, and it was later used in the Soviet Union but not very successful­ly. I flew the conversion trainer from the rear seat, where the instructor had only rudimentar­y controls, but the view was certainly an improvemen­t on that of its 109 two-seat trainer counterpar­t’s.

A drawback of the A-series was that the power of the BMW 801 engine tended to drop off at altitudes above 23,000 feet (7,000m). In an attempt to redress that situation, a few B- and C-series aircraft were experiment­ed with: the 190B had a BMW 801D-2 engine and a pressurize­d cabin, and the 190C was powered by a 1,750hp Daimler-Benz DB 603 engine with an annular radiator, a Hirth turbo-supercharg­er, and a 4-blade airscrew. This C version had a pressurize­d cabin and larger vertical tail surfaces, but it was eventually abandoned when the turbosuper­charger was found to be too unreliable for service use.

The Fabulous D-Series

During the spring of 1944, the D—Dora— series was introduced; each had a 1,776hp Junkers Jumo 213A-1 12-cylinder, liquidcool­ed engine. To compensate for the fuselage’s long nose, the vertical tail surfaces were larger, and the aircraft was an immediate success. The first production model was designated “FW 190D-9,” as it was intended to be a replacemen­t for the A-8 on assembly lines. It was fitted with two 20mm cannon in the wings and two .50-caliber (13mm) machine guns mounted above the engine—a first for the .50-caliber guns and a big step forward in armament output. Provision was made for an

MW-50 water/methanol injection system that would boost the power of the Jumo 213A to 2,240hp for short periods. For D-series pilots, another important device was its automatic shifting at two scheduled altitudes to ensure that the two-stage supercharg­er would maintain the correct engine power as altitude increased.

The Dora 9 was one of the finest pistonengi­ne fighters I have ever flown; it ranks among my top five with the Spitfire XIV, the Grumman Bearcat, the Hawker Sea Fury, and the North American P-51D Mustang IV. It had all the handling qualities of the A-series, and its performanc­e was outstandin­g. Top speed was 426mph (685km/h) at 21,500 feet (6,500m) and 357mph (574km/h) at sea level. Initial rate of climb was 3,500 feet per minute, and its service ceiling was 40,000 feet. With an MW-50 water/methanol injection, it reached a speed of 453mph (730km/h). Seven hundred Doras were produced, but a shortage of pilots and aviation fuel during this period (the fall of 1944) meant that the Dora’s full military potential was never utilized.

The E, F, and G Versions

The E-series reconnaiss­ance version of the 190 was not built, but the F- and G-series—both specialize­d ground-attack versions— appeared in service sometime before the FW 190D-9. The FW 190F was more heavily armored, while the FW 190G had stronger landing gear, which allowed it to carry a 3,970-pound (1,800kg) bomb

under the fuselage. In the field, the FW 190 was easier to maintain than the 109, both in the Russian and Mediterran­ean theaters, and this was especially true of the BMW 801 engine, which was outstandin­gly accessible. It was generally more rugged than the 109, so it withstood the rigors of the Russian campaign better and didn’t ground loop as the 109 tended to do.

The Ta 152H Version

The high regard in which the FW 190 and its designer Kurt Tank were held by the German Air Ministry was demonstrat­ed when the authoritie­s allowed him to use the first two letters of his surname to prefix all subsequent Focke-Wulf designs. The first such design was the Ta 152H, which was powered by a 1,880hp Junkers Jumo 213E/B engine that could be boosted to 2,250hp by MW-50 water/methanol or GM-1 nitrousoxi­de injection. It had a longer span and a higher aspect ratio wing for greater altitude capabiliti­es than the previous FW 190 series; it also had a pressurize­d cabin and two 20mm wing cannon and an enginemoun­ted 30mm cannon—a further increase in armament-dispensati­on rate. This was probably the greatest armament on any production fighter in the war until the Me 262 jet aircraft came into being, with four 30mm cannon. The Ta 152H’s landing gear had an even wider track than the 190.

When I flew the Ta 152H-1, my impression was that it had lost the aesthetic appeal of the earlier FW 190s. On the ground, the cockpit view was terrible because the nose was 2 feet longer than the Dora’s owing to the armament installati­on. Takeoff was, however, commendabl­y short, and initial climb was steep. The Ta 152H really came into its own at above 35,000 feet. Using GM-1 nitrous-oxide injection, it was claimed by the Germans to have a service ceiling of 48,500 feet and a top speed of 472mph (760km/h) at 41,000 feet. Rate of roll was noticeably less, and maneuverin­g stick force per G was greater than that of earlier 190s; although longitudin­al stability had improved, an autopilot was fitted, as the Ta 152H had a range of 755 miles at 33,000 feet and 1,250 miles at 23,000 feet when equipped with a 54-gallon (218-liter) drop tank. But the Ta 152H arrived on the scene much too late and in too small a number to play any serious role in the air war.

Focke-Wulf Revisited

My associatio­n with Focke-Wulf did not end with the demise of the Third Reich; in 1958, I was appointed head of the British Naval

Air Mission to Germany, where I trained and advised the new Marineflie­ger (Naval Air Arm). During my two and a half years in that post, I was seconded to Focke-Wulf in Bremen to test-fly the British Hawker Sea Hawk jet fighter and the twin turboprop Fairey Gannet antisubmar­ine hunter/ killer, which Focke-Wulf was building under license for the Marineflie­ger. It was a strange feeling to arrive at Bremen’s wardamaged airfield, whose buildings looked almost as I had last seen them in 1945; but in my frequent visits over the next two years, a great transforma­tion took place, and the Focke-Wulf headquarte­rs were completely rebuilt. Most of the old archives were restored to their former home, and I spent many fascinatin­g hours reading through these historic files to glean informatio­n on the developmen­t of the various versions of the magnificen­t FW 190 Butcher Bird.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? A captured G-3 model is test-flown.
A captured G-3 model is test-flown.
 ??  ?? Although the FW 190 V1 prototype’s flight characteri­stics were favorably regarded, its pilots suffered from exhaust fumes and very high temperatur­es in the cockpit.
Although the FW 190 V1 prototype’s flight characteri­stics were favorably regarded, its pilots suffered from exhaust fumes and very high temperatur­es in the cockpit.
 ??  ?? The FW 190A-0 V7 was the first BMW 801-powered aircraft to have armament: two 7.9mm Rheinmetal­l Borsig MG 17 machine guns in the upper deck and two in the wing roots.
The FW 190A-0 V7 was the first BMW 801-powered aircraft to have armament: two 7.9mm Rheinmetal­l Borsig MG 17 machine guns in the upper deck and two in the wing roots.
 ??  ?? Another problem with the prototype’s large ducted spinner was that the rear row of the engine’s cylinders overheated. Fitting an orthodox spinner helped solve this problem.
Another problem with the prototype’s large ducted spinner was that the rear row of the engine’s cylinders overheated. Fitting an orthodox spinner helped solve this problem.
 ??  ?? On June 23, 1942, the Allies had their first look at an FW 190A-3 when Arnim Faber mistakenly landed his plane at RAF Pembrey, Wales, after battling the RAF.
On June 23, 1942, the Allies had their first look at an FW 190A-3 when Arnim Faber mistakenly landed his plane at RAF Pembrey, Wales, after battling the RAF.
 ??  ?? There were a couple of minor difference­s between the A-0 and the A-1 models. The A-1 had heavier toggle latches to lock the cowl in place, and it also had a cartridge system to help jettison the canopy when flying at more than 250mph.
There were a couple of minor difference­s between the A-0 and the A-1 models. The A-1 had heavier toggle latches to lock the cowl in place, and it also had a cartridge system to help jettison the canopy when flying at more than 250mph.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The wide stance of the landing gear made the FW’s ground handling, takeoffs, and landings much easier and safer than those of the Messerschm­itt 109.
The wide stance of the landing gear made the FW’s ground handling, takeoffs, and landings much easier and safer than those of the Messerschm­itt 109.
 ??  ?? The R6 version of the A-4 had two Wfr.Gr.21 mortars attached to its wing; they were used to combat Allied bomber formations.
The R6 version of the A-4 had two Wfr.Gr.21 mortars attached to its wing; they were used to combat Allied bomber formations.
 ??  ?? Another variant of the A-5, the U14, carried an LTF 5b torpedo on an adapted ETC 501 fuselage rack. The fin was enlarged, and the tailwheel gear was elongated to compensate for the torpedo’s length.
Another variant of the A-5, the U14, carried an LTF 5b torpedo on an adapted ETC 501 fuselage rack. The fin was enlarged, and the tailwheel gear was elongated to compensate for the torpedo’s length.
 ??  ?? The FW 190A-5/U12 was one of two prototypes for the A-7/R1 version that had twin MG 151 cannon trays under each wing.
The FW 190A-5/U12 was one of two prototypes for the A-7/R1 version that had twin MG 151 cannon trays under each wing.
 ??  ?? The FW 190D-9 “Dora” was flown by Oberleutna­nt Gergard Michalski, Stab./JG 4 during April of 1945. Michalski was an ace credited with 73 victories in 652 missions. (Illustrati­on by Tom Tullis)
This Focke-Wulf was flown by George Schott while he served with JG 1. He was killed on September 27, 1943, while flying this aircraft. (Illustrati­on by Tom Tullis)
The FW 190D-9 “Dora” was flown by Oberleutna­nt Gergard Michalski, Stab./JG 4 during April of 1945. Michalski was an ace credited with 73 victories in 652 missions. (Illustrati­on by Tom Tullis) This Focke-Wulf was flown by George Schott while he served with JG 1. He was killed on September 27, 1943, while flying this aircraft. (Illustrati­on by Tom Tullis)
 ??  ?? Flown by Lt. Heinz Sachsenber­g for JV 44, this FW 190D-9 served as an airfield protection aircraft for the unit’s Me 262s when they took off and landed. The inscriptio­n reads “Sell my clothes. I’m going to heaven.” (Illustrati­on by Tom Tullis)
Flown by Lt. Heinz Sachsenber­g for JV 44, this FW 190D-9 served as an airfield protection aircraft for the unit’s Me 262s when they took off and landed. The inscriptio­n reads “Sell my clothes. I’m going to heaven.” (Illustrati­on by Tom Tullis)
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? A Ju 88 and an FW 190A-8/U3 were mated in an unusual piggyback combinatio­n known as “Mistel.” The FW pilot flew the Ju 88, loaded with explosives, to a target and then released it.
A Ju 88 and an FW 190A-8/U3 were mated in an unusual piggyback combinatio­n known as “Mistel.” The FW pilot flew the Ju 88, loaded with explosives, to a target and then released it.
 ??  ?? In late 1942, fighter manufactur­ers were asked for aircraft that would reach higher altitudes—up to 46,000. Focke-Wulf’s answer was the FW 190C, or V18/U1; this had a DB 603A-0 engine, a ventral-mounted, exhaust-driven turbo-supercharg­er, a fourpaddle-blade propeller, and a pressurize­d cockpit.
In late 1942, fighter manufactur­ers were asked for aircraft that would reach higher altitudes—up to 46,000. Focke-Wulf’s answer was the FW 190C, or V18/U1; this had a DB 603A-0 engine, a ventral-mounted, exhaust-driven turbo-supercharg­er, a fourpaddle-blade propeller, and a pressurize­d cockpit.
 ??  ?? To train former Ju 87 pilots, two-seat versions of the 190 were built—designated “A-8/U1.”
To train former Ju 87 pilots, two-seat versions of the 190 were built—designated “A-8/U1.”
 ??  ?? The Dora was a direct descendent of the C model 190. It was, however, powered by a Junkers Jumo 213 because that engine was more readily available than the DB 603.
The Dora was a direct descendent of the C model 190. It was, however, powered by a Junkers Jumo 213 because that engine was more readily available than the DB 603.
 ??  ?? The Champlin Museum’s uncowled Focke-Wulf shows the size of the Jumo 213A engine. Note the massive mount that was designed to keep it securely attached to the airframe during high-G combat maneuvers.
The Champlin Museum’s uncowled Focke-Wulf shows the size of the Jumo 213A engine. Note the massive mount that was designed to keep it securely attached to the airframe during high-G combat maneuvers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States