Yachting

SUPERIOR SURVEY

NOAA’s remote-survey technology is making better charts, which means safer boating for all yachtsmen.

- By David Schmidt

Maritime wisdom holds that there are two kinds of boaters: those who have found the bottom, and those who will. I joined the former club in 1988 while cruising the Chesapeake Bay with my dad and his buddies. We were flying our brightly colored spinnaker when Windancer — my parents’ C&C 37 — “discovered” an uncharted sandbar. Dousing the kite wasn’t problemati­c, but refloating our vessel involved the crew dangling from the starboard shroud and rocking her keel free. We eventually found deeper soundings, but not before I learned some creative expletives from my dad, who wasn’t thrilled with his brand-new-but-already-obsolete paper charts. As we learned that day, sandbars sometimes move faster than survey crews. ¶ The National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion is using forward-leaning technology to close that knowledge gap. NOA A produces and maintains all official cartograph­y for U.S. waters, including a staggering 95,000 miles of shoreline. The agency’s traditiona­l methods for collecting bathymetri­c measuremen­ts work well for soundings deeper than 30 feet, but recent years have seen the rise of remote-sensing technologi­es, which allow NOAA to acquire precise, high-resolution bathymetri­c data for shorelines and nearshore waters.

“We maintain the shoreline on NOAA nautical charts, which is considered the nation’s legal shoreline,” says Gretchen Imahori from NOAA’s Remote Sensing Division, whose tools include light detection and ranging laser-pulse technology (lidar). “Aside from being able to derive our shoreline from our topographi­c-bathymetri­c lidar data, it also allows us to help update nearshore and back-bay areas on NOAA charts. It is more efficient for us to survey these areas, and safer than sending in launches with sonar.”

NOAA employs its remote-sensed data to update its nautical charts quickly and accurately, and to support emergency efforts after major storms (see sidebar). The agency’s charts are available to all mariners to download for free, and virtually all third-party cartograph­y companies use NOAA data as the U.S. base maps underpinni­ng their proprietar­y offerings. The sensing division, Imahori says, works closely with NOAA’s Hydrograph­ic Surveys Division and Marine Chart Division to coordinate survey-collecting efforts. The sensing division uses two specially equipped planes to collect shoreline, nearshore and back-bay survey data, while the hydrograph­ic division surveys waters deeper than 13 feet.

NOAA’s DHC-6 Twin Otter aircraft serves as the slow, low-flying operating platform for the agency’s Riegl VQ880-G airborne laser-scanning system. The Riegl lidar uses a green laser in an elliptical scanning pattern to measure the distance to a surface from survey heights of roughly 1,000 to 2,000 feet. While previous-generation lidar equipment could collect “a few” data points per square meter, Imahori says, the Riegl collects as many as nine points per meter in shallow water (down to 56 feet).

“It’s an immense amount of detail,” Imahori says, adding that lidar works in places where NOAA’s vessels previously found it difficult to operate. The technology works best, she says, with bright, light-reflective bottoms and calm, crystal-clear waters.

NOAA’s King Air, meanwhile, carries two 80-megapixel cameras. One collects “red-green-blue” color imagery, the other near-infrared imagery. Both are accurate to 35 centimeter­s from 10,500 feet. This ultra-high-resolution imagery is used for photogramm­etry, the science of taking precise measuremen­ts using photograph­y.

Given the speeds of these aircraft, when compared with a slower, ship-towed sonar array, the sensing division can cover ground quickly, a critical ability when collecting post-hurricane data. However, given the sheer volume of nearshore bathymetri­c data that must be compiled, Imahori says, the division also contracts work out to commercial survey companies and is researchin­g the use of eBee drones. The drones would collect aerial photograph­y to produce 3D models accurate to 3 centimeter­s.

While the sensing division is doing its work, the hydrograph­ic division develops project instructio­ns for in-house and third-party survey missions across 3.4 million square miles. It then takes that data — along with sensing-division data — and reviews it for quality-control before applying it to official NOAA products, including the bathymetry database or nautical charts. One of the hydrograph­ic division’s most important resources is its Hydrograph­ic Health Model, which factors the age, acquisitio­n technique and seafloor type of all existing NOAA

bathymetri­c data and cartograph­y, as well as AIS traffic data, to help create a nationwide priority list for survey work. The hydrograph­ic division uses modern sonar for its survey work, with side-scanning sonar in relatively shallow waters (down to 330 feet) and a towed, multibeam sonar (broadcasti­ng across chirp frequencie­s) to take deeper soundings. “With multibeam sonar, we can collect bathymetri­c data but also backscatte­r, and we can use science to estimate what the seafloor is made of,” says Rick Brennan, NOAA’s chief of the hydrograph­ic division. “Sonar gives us a wide array of informatio­n, and it can measure things in the water column — it’s the gold standard — but its swath width is related to the depth.” Shallow waters, he adds, produce narrow-diameter sonar cones on the seafloor (read: time-consuming survey work), so the division instead uses side-scanning sonar or, if conditions allow, lidar.

Satellite imagery is another important asset. “We have the ability to take a picture of [a specific part of ] the Earth once per day,” says Brennan, whose division then uses the imagery to seek out and monitor areas with dynamic seafloors. “The accuracy may be coarse, but it’s the ability to see change that’s really valuable.”

Once bathymetri­c data is collected, “we can use statistica­l filters to look for places where the seafloor isn’t consistent,” explains Brennan. The tools help focus eyeballs on inconsiste­ncies or potentiall­y problemati­c data. “Modern multibeam [sonars] can produce anywhere from 10 to 100 depth measuremen­ts per square meter of the seafloor,” he adds. “The standard deviation of these measuremen­ts is typically about 8 to 10 inches. In high-traffic areas, we have the ability to cut this in half with modern surveying methods.”

The result of NOAA’s forward-leaning work is much more accurate nautical charts and higher-quality bathymetri­c data, both of which benefit all mariners. With luck, these technologi­es will yield newer generation­s of yachtsmen who never have to find the bottom the hard way, and help the rest of us avoid being reinaugura­ted into “the club.”

 ??  ?? Remote-sensing technologi­es allow NOAA to take soundings in waters often too dangerous for surface vessels.
Remote-sensing technologi­es allow NOAA to take soundings in waters often too dangerous for surface vessels.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States