Yuma Sun

5 things about Congress’ fight over Planned Parenthood

- THE BATTLEGROU­ND WHAT PLANNED PARENTHOOD DOES THE SENATE BILL A TRICKY ISSUE THE NEXT FIGHT

WASHINGTON — Republican­s will likely lose today’s Senate showdown over halting federal aid to Planned Parenthood. Yet the political offensive by abortion foes has just started, prompted by a batch of unsettling videos that has focused attention on the group’s little-noticed practice of providing fetal tissue to researcher­s.

Conservati­ves have long targeted Planned Parenthood, which provides health services, family planning and abortions in clinics across the country. The furtively recorded videos, with hairraisin­g close-ups of aborted fetal organs and Planned Parenthood officials dispassion­ately describing how “I’m not going to crush that part,” have forced the group and its Democratic champions into a defensive crouch.

Five things to know:

Citing statements in the videos by Planned Parenthood officials, opponents including the Center for Medical Progress, which recorded the videos, accuse the group of profiting from selling fetal organs. That would violate a federal criminal statute that lets providers recover only their expenses. They also say Planned Parenthood is altering abortion procedures to better recover usable tissue.

Conservati­ves view the videos as a huge political opportunit­y to galvanize support for banning abortions and, some hope, prohibitin­g fetal tissue research. But the issue is cutting both ways, with both sides using it for fundraisin­g solicitati­ons.

Planned Parenthood has apologized for comments in the video but says it has broken no laws. It accuses opponents of using selectivel­y edited videos for their latest assault on abortion and women’s health choices.

The group also says it is among many organizati­ons assisting fetal tissue research, a decades-old field scientists use to study Alzheimer’s and other diseases.

There are roughly 1 million U.S. abortions yearly. In its most recent annual report, Planned Parenthood said it performed 328,000 of them.

Planned Parenthood and its supporters have sought to shift the focus, saying abortions represent just 3 percent of the 10.9 million services the organizati­on provides annually in nearly 700 clinics.

The group says its yearly workload includes 4.5 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitte­d diseases; 3.6 million contracept­ion procedures and devices; 1.1 million pregnancy tests and 900,000 cancer tests and treatments.

Of Planned Parenthood’s 2.7 million annual clients, mostly women, it says 4 in 5 earn 150 percent of the federal poverty level or less. Democrats say an attack on Planned Parenthood is an effort to keep women, many of them poor, from needed health services.

Monday’s vote is on barring federal aid to Planned Parenthood and shifting the money to other health care providers.

That’s big money for Planned Parenthood. It says of $1.3 billion in revenue last year, $528 million came from taxpayers, including state funds that help finance Medicaid.

Planned Parenthood defenders say cutting federal aid wouldn’t affect the abortions it provides because federal money cannot be used for abortions except for cases of rape, incest or when a woman’s life is in peril. Opponents say squeezing money from Planned Parenthood makes it choose between spending its remaining funds on abortions or other services.

Republican­s say if Congress denied federal aid to Planned Parenthood, other providers could cover the group’s displaced clients. They say the nearly 9,100 federally funded community health centers, more than 10 times the number of Planned Parenthood locations, could pick up the slack.

Planned Parenthood disagrees, saying their sites serve disproport­ionate numbers of low-income women and are often where no other alternativ­es exist.

Abortion’s battle lines are clear for some politician­s but dicey for many.

The GOP has bumbled the issue recently, including Missouri GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin’s 2012 comment on “legitimate rape” that probably sealed his defeat. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, is sponsor of the Senate bill, a female face Republican­s hope will blunt repeated Democratic accusation­s that the GOP is waging war on women.

Many Democrats have distanced themselves from the video’s remarks. Many are choosing their words like Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who says of Republican­s, “They’re attacking women’s health.”

Underscori­ng the sensitivit­y, some moderates will likely cross party lines today. Sens. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, are among several saying little about how they will vote.

Some Republican­s say they won’t vote for spending bills keeping the government open starting Oct. 1 with any Planned Parenthood funds.

Many conservati­ves are itching for that fight. “Show me a Democrat who’ll force a shutdown over selling baby parts,” said Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., who says dozens of GOP lawmakers will join him in opposing bills with Planned Parenthood money.

But GOP leaders are reluctant to force a shutdown fight that could haunt them in the 2016 elections, as are some presidenti­al candidates.

Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican seeking the GOP nomination, said: “I support any legislatio­n that will defund Planned Parenthood. But I don’t think you start out with your objective to shut down government.”

Paul, speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union,” added, “I mean, if President Obama wants to shut down government because he doesn’t get funds for Planned Parenthood, that would be President Obama’s determinat­ion to shut down government.”

Democrats are likely to block such bills in the Senate and President Barack Obama is nearly certain to veto any reaching him. So some Republican­s want to see whether congressio­nal investigat­ions of Planned Parenthood produce evidence that forces Democrats to concede.

“The more Americans learn about Planned Parenthood’s horrific practices, the easier it will be for Congress to defund them,” said Emily Schillinge­r, spokeswoma­n for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States