Yuma Sun

Yumans deserve to know what’s happening here

Local details hard to obtain on hot-button border issue

- MICHAEL ENAULT VINCENT LACEY

Nestled as we are on the U.S.-Mexico border, the Yuma Sun has been watching the stories about separating children from parents with a close eye.

The Yuma Sector stretches over 126 miles of U.S. border, from the Imperial Sand Dunes to the YumaPima County line, and “is comprised of approximat­ely 181,670 square miles of primarily desert terrain divided between California and Arizona,” according to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection website.

That’s a tremendous territory to cover, and statistica­lly speaking, one would think some families would have been caught in that sector between April and June. Readers have asked us what’s going on here. But finding out that informatio­n has been challengin­g.

How many families have been taken into custody by Yuma Sector agents in this time frame?

How many children have been separated from their families here?

What happened to the children? Where were they sent? Are there facilities here, or are they sent elsewhere?

Now that President Trump has ended that practice, what happens next, locally, to reunite children and their families?

On June 21, Yuma Sector acting chief patrol agent Carl Landrum spoke to the Washington Post. The report notes that as of Thursday morning, Border Patrol agents stopped separating parents from their children. Landrum added that “parents crossing the border illegally with their children would no longer be referred for prosecutio­n for illegal entry, although they would still face consequenc­es because they would be transferre­d to ICE for deportatio­n.”

“Did they break the law doing that? Yes, they did,” he said of parents crossing the border illegally. “Are they going to be held accountabl­e? Yes, they will. Are we going to do that in a way that is as compassion­ate as possible? Yes,” the Post reported.

We’ve reached out repeatedly to Border Patrol locally to get answers to our local questions and keep our readers informed, but have been unsuccessf­ul.

On Friday afternoon, local Border Patrol officials responded to the Yuma Sun with this statement:

“U.S. Customs and Border Protection has taken immediate steps to implement the President’s Executive Order Affording Congress the Opportunit­y to Address Family Separation. Family unity will be maintained for families apprehende­d crossing the border illegally, and they will be transferre­d together to U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t. The Border Patrol will continue to refer for prosecutio­n adults who cross the border illegally. For those children still in Border Patrol custody, we are reuniting them with parents or legal guardians returned to Border Patrol custody following prosecutio­n. As specified in the order, families will not be detained together when doing so would pose a risk to the child’s welfare. Additional­ly, as was the case prior to implementa­tion of the zero tolerance policy on May 5, family units may be separated due to humanitari­an, health and safety, or criminal history in addition to illegally crossing the border.”

Then, we were directed to a national CBP media relations email address for answers to our questions. The Yuma Sun took that step on Friday, and we are awaiting a response.

Border Patrol has a responsibi­lity to speak to local media, and be transparen­t on what is happening in our community.

The situation is a hot, sensitive subject, but staying silent only ignites flames. Yumans deserve to know what’s happening in their backyards.

DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS OR NOT?

The vast majority of those “kids” were sent here by their parents. They weren’t “ripped” from their mommies’ arms! These kids have no education or job skills thus we will support our Democrats soon to be Democrat voters for their entire lives. No vetting to see how many criminals we are letting in. Also, how long before we become a third world country like the one they left but so love that they wave their country’s flag while claiming they are not being given their rights? Trump is chastised for changing his mind instead of applauded for doing so. All this is a contrived issue by the Democrats to bash Trump and win more votes in November. If we told the illegals they couldn’t vote for 20 years, the Dems would help build the wall, with Schumer and Pelosi leading the charge

OK, the border situation is a mess. Sending your children across the border while being aware of the circumstan­ces that may befall them is the equivalent of child abuse. Sending children unaccompan­ied by parents in the charge of a smuggler, also commonly referred to as a “coyote” is ultimately more abhorrent. Some of these folks deal in human traffickin­g and will “sell” children into prostituti­on, or worse.

Laws with respect to illegal border crossings are quite clear. The Illegal Immigratio­n Reform and Immigratio­n Responsibi­lity Act of 1996 enacted into law during the Clinton administra­tion expanded the rainbow of aggravated felonies with respect to illegal immigratio­n.

Without the existence of borders, you have no nation or sovereignt­y. You also enable criminal elements to flex their muscle. In addition, the terrorism element cannot be discounted or ignored due to lax border security.

The open borders crowd knowingly promotes the destructio­n of our heritage and marginaliz­es the premise of “American Exceptiona­lism.” No surprise. They have disdain for America. In their world view, nothing is exceptiona­l about America. America has and continues to be the primary problem around the world in their distorted sense of reality.

That being said, a comprehens­ive immigratio­n reform policy must be formulated. Our borders are vital and sacrosanct to the future of our nation. At the same time, we must exercise a modicum of restraint and humanity. There are no winners, only folks caught in the middle, some by their own design. If the solution was easy, it would be a matter of historical fact.

Without our founding principles and sovereignt­y, we will become Europe. They are losing their identity

The decision to separate small children from their parents is morally unacceptab­le. But then perhaps the White House personnel live within the concept of moral unacceptab­ility. We as a people are losing our self-respect and are allowing this administra­tion to use falsehoods, lies, and innuendos to try and deflect their inability to be moral and honest about any subject. Immigratio­n policy for this administra­tion is a non-starter.

I cannot put all the blame on the president. The factions within the GOP, the lack of leadership, by party in power is morally and unethicall­y bankrupt. Since the GOP has relinquish­ed its duties and responsibi­lities as a governing body to the president and his minority followers, “Cowardice in the name of party unity does not serve America well.” Using the election year as an excuse not to deal with hard issues is cowardice. Perhaps we need to change who we vote for because both parties have too much power and do not really represent the general population.

The Democrats are no better than the Republican­s. To solve this immigratio­n crisis, they need to bring forth valid ideas. Both parties must get past the “Party Only” attitude. America has many problems that require solutions, not rancor and pompous attitude.

Immigratio­n and migration is a major issue that must be solved. Just saying it’s the law is unacceptab­le. One other note, where are the religious leaders? Perhaps they are also pandering, and lack moral courage.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States