Yuma Sun

Ariz. prisoner won’t be executed in gas chamber

- BY JACQUES BILLEAUD

PHOENIX – An Arizona prisoner is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection in less than three weeks for killing an 8-year-old girl, marking the second condemned man to decline lethal gas since the state refurbishe­d its gas chamber – a method of execution that hasn’t been used in the United States in more than 20 years.

Frank Atwood declined to pick a method of execution when correction­s officials asked him if he wanted to die by lethal injection or the gas chamber. Lethal injection is Arizona’s default execution method when condemned prisoners refuse to make a selection.

Clarence Dixon, who earlier this month became the first prisoner to be executed in Arizona since July 2014, also had refused to make a choice on his execution method.

The last lethal gas execution in the United States was carried out in 1999 in Arizona, which refurbishe­d its gas chamber at the prison in Florence, southeast of Phoenix, in late 2020. The state also had purchased materials to make hydrogen cyanide gas, which was used in some past U.S. executions and by Nazis to kill 865,000 Jews at the Auschwitz concentrat­ion camp alone.

Death penalty experts say the United States turned away from the gas chamber and switched to lethal injections due to the horrific nature of the lethal gas deaths.

They said gas chamber executions were slow deaths in which prisoners gasped for breath, thrashed their restrained bodies and appeared to be in excruciati­ng pain.

Arizona, California, Missouri and Wyoming are the only states with decades-old lethal-gas execution laws still on the books. Arizona is the only one that still has a working gas chamber.

Atwood is scheduled to be executed with an injection of pentobarbi­tal on June 8 for his murder conviction in the killing of 8-year-old Vicki Hoskinson in 1984.

Authoritie­s have said Atwood kidnapped the girl, whose remains were discovered in the desert northwest of Tucson nearly seven months after her disappeara­nce. Experts could not determine the cause of death from the bones that were found, according to court records.

Atwood’s legal defense team said in a statement that both methods of execution would cause maximum pain and suffering for him and would violate his protection­s against cruel and unusual punishment.

“The choice between one form of torture and another form of torture is no choice at all,” said Joseph Perkovich, one of Atwood’s attorneys. “By designatin­g cyanide gas, the state is cynically forcing Mr. Atwood to accept gratuitous suffering on its execution table or torture in its gas chamber from poison used in Nazi mass exterminat­ons.”

Deborah Denno, a Fordham Law School professor who has studied executions for more than 25 years, said a substantia­l number of condemned people don’t make a selection when asked how they want to be put to death.

“No one knows the reasons (why), but one factor is they are depressed and have given up,” Denno said. “This is the least of their worries. They are going to die.”

The state’s nearly eightyear hiatus in executions that ended with Dixon’s May 11 death has been attributed to the difficulty of securing lethal injection drugs as manufactur­ers refuse to supply them and problems encountere­d during the July 2014 execution of Joseph Wood.

Wood was given 15 doses of a two-drug combinatio­n over nearly two hours. Wood snorted repeatedly and gasped before he died. His attorney said the execution had been botched.

In recent years, Oklahoma, Mississipp­i and Alabama have passed laws allowing executions with nitrogen gas, at least in some circumstan­ces, though experts say it’s never been done and no state has establishe­d a protocol that would allow it, according to the Death Penalty Informatio­n Center.

The last prisoner to be executed in a U.S. gas chamber was Walter LaGrand, the second of two German brothers sentenced to death for killing a bank manager in 1982 in southern Arizona. It took LaGrand 18 minutes to die in 1999.

Both brothers chose the gas chamber in hopes that courts would find the method unconstitu­tional. While Karl LaGrand accepted the state’s last-minute offer of lethal injection, Walter LaGrand rejected it, saying he would prefer a more painful execution to protest the death penalty.

The case drew widespread criticism in Germany, which has no death penalty, and prompted repeated diplomatic protests.

Arizona’s gas chamber refurbishm­ent was condemned internatio­nally, including coverage in Israel and Germany drawing parallels to Holocaust atrocities.

 ?? ?? FRANK ATWOOD
FRANK ATWOOD

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States