Yuma Sun

House committee will hold border hearing in Yuma

County seeks Congressio­nal support with ag labor, immigratio­n reform

- BY MARA KNAUB Sun STAFF Writer

The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, also called the House Judiciary Committee, will soon hold a hearing on border issues in Yuma.

Several local officials and community members are scheduled to testify, however, the date and list of witnesses have not been released yet.

Yuma County Vice Chair Jonathan Lines announced the hearing on Monday during the Board of Supervisor­s meeting while discussing the border situation.

“We will have the opportunit­y to host the Judiciary Committee in Yuma within the next month. They’ll be holding a federal hearing here specifical­ly on this stuff. So the sheriff and I have been preparing for that. It’s not announced yet,” Lines said, adding that the committee “will be here specifical­ly to deal with the border issues.”

He noted that the hearing will be chaired by Jim Jordan, a U.S. representa­tive from Ohio and chair of the House Judiciary Committee. Dr. Bob Trenschel, president and CEO of Yuma Regional Medical Center, will testify as well as others in the community, Lines said.

The House Judiciary Committee is currently working on H.R. 876, which would amend the Immigratio­n and Nationalit­y Act to reform certain asylum procedures. The bill was introduced in the House of Representa­tives on Wednesday.

Lines announced the hearing while the board discussed federal priorities in preparatio­n for the National Associatio­n of Counties Legislativ­e Conference to be held Feb. 11-14 in Washington, D.C.

Immigratio­n and agricultur­e labor are among the priorities that supervisor­s wish to discuss with federal officials. They plan to urge Congress to take up agricultur­e labor legislatio­n as a means of improving the H-2A Temporary Agricultur­al Program.

However, the supervisor­s agreed to refrain from using the word “reform” while discussing

agricultur­al labor as it has a “negative connotatio­ns” and might result in “pushback.” But they believe “reform” is appropriat­e when discussing the need for changes in immigratio­n policies.

“Now, immigratio­n reform, that one you can’t really tailor, but the other one (ag labor), I think more what we’re asking is support,” Supervisor Tony Reyes said.

AGRICULTUR­E LABOR

The agricultur­e labor “enhancemen­ts” to the H-2A Temporary Agricultur­al Program that the supervisor­s are looking for include removing the cap on three-year visas “as it is arbitrary and unnecessar­y” and providing “sufficient” visas for fulltime agricultur­e workers.

The agricultur­e industry currently splits the number of visas with the dairy and cattle industry. Hence, the supervisor­s seek an increase to the number of visas allowed for full-time agricultur­e workers, without having to share them with other industries.

To back up their proposals, the supervisor­s will share the following data:

• In fiscal year 2022, out of 382,354 positions requested across the United States through the H-2A Temporary Agricultur­al Program, the U.S. Department of Labor certified 371,619 positions, which resulted in an increase in the gap between the positions requested by producers across the nation and those approved by the U.S. DOL.

• In FY 2022, the U.S. DOL certified 13,731 H-2A positions in Arizona, accounting for 3.6% of all positions certified in the United States.

• In FY 2022, the U.S. DOL certified 3,526 H-2A positions in Yuma County.

IMMIGRATIO­N REFORM

County officials will also urge Congress to enact comprehens­ive immigratio­n reform. To stress the need for changes to the immigratio­n policy, the supervisor­s will offer the following informatio­n:

• Traditiona­lly, the federal government exercises exclusive control over immigratio­n policy. A fundamenta­l principle of immigratio­n law since 1790 is that the federal government has primary power and responsibi­lity. These are related to several Constituti­onal provisions, including the power of Congress to “provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and to establish a uniform Rule of Naturaliza­tion.” States and counties have no control over the flow of immigrants across their borders.

• The costs of the federal government’s “failed” immigratio­n policy disproport­ionately affect all counties along the U.s.-mexico border.

• The number of asylum seekers and migrants entering Yuma County from Mexico continues to increase, with more than 310,000 apprehensi­ons made by Yuma Sector agents in the fiscal year 2022 alone.

• In 2022, the Yuma County Sheriff’s Office recovered 70 deceased migrants, a record-breaking number, who perished while attempting to cross into the United States. Each recovery took an average of five hours of a deputy’s time, which amounts to almost $20,000 just in deputies’ salaries.

• In 2022, the YCSO responded to 756 emergency calls by migrants who required emergency assistance.

• In 2022, the YCSO rescued more than 24 underage migrants in remote parts of the county.

• Yuma County installed portable toilets along the border to keep migrants from going into agricultur­e fields, with an estimated cost to the county of $70,000.

• The number of asylum seekers and migrants is expected to increase by 40% or more once Title 42 is lifted.

• The projected increase of asylum seekers and migrants has and will continue to strain the ability of medical staff and local hospital resources to provide essential and necessary medical care to Yuma residents as well as the migrant community.

• The increased numbers of asylum seekers and migrants have and will continue to place a severe strain on federal and state resources, nonprofit organizati­ons, and others providing humanitari­an and healthcare services.

After Alejandro Figueroa, the county’s economic developmen­t and intergover­nmental affairs director, shared the above talking points with the supervisor­s, the board members asked for even more precise numbers, in particular, for the costs absorbed by the Sheriff’s Office and other agencies and organizati­ons. For example, they pointed out that the current estimates do not include coroner and medical costs to retrieve bodies and treat rescued and/or other migrants as well as vehicle wear and tear and fuel.

Figueroa noted that a lot of the data is not readily available, however, supervisor­s asked that he try his best in coming up with estimates.

“I just don’t want them to think that’s all it costs,” Reyes said.

“I think it would be critical to try to put together some type of an estimate of the total cost. I know that it’s difficult,” Lines noted, adding that the numbers would be useful for sharing at the upcoming hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States