Yuma Sun

Arizona bill would change voter initiative requiremen­ts

- BY BOB CHRISTIE

PHOENIX – Republican lawmakers on Tuesday advanced a measure that would ask voters to take away even more of their own power to write their own laws after persuading them last year to significan­tly limit their power of the initiative.

The voter referral approved along party lines by the Senate would require backers of initiative­s to collect signatures from all 30 legislativ­e districts for an initiative, constituti­onal amendment or voter referendum to make the ballot.

Currently, the constituti­on requires signatures from 10% of the people who voted at the last gubernator­ial election for an initiative to make the ballot. That would be about 260,000 for 2024.

A constituti­onal amendment requires the signatures of 15% of those who voted; putting a bill passed by the Legislatur­e on hold so it can be referred to the ballot takes 5%.

But there are no requiremen­ts on where signatures have to be gathered. That means a proposal could be put to voters just based on the wishes of residents of Maricopa County.

If the House also approves the measure, voters would be asked in 2024 to change the requiremen­t so that those signatures come from each of the legislativ­e districts.

The proposal from Chandler Republican Sen. J.D. Mesnard comes after years of efforts by Republican­s to make it harder to get voter initiative­s on the ballot and easier to kick them off.

Backed by the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, lawmakers have limited the ability of voters to bypass the Gop-controlled legislatur­e and enact statutes lawmakers refused to consider, such as those legalizing marijuana and raising the minimum wage.

In last November’s election, voters approved two of the three changes to the initiative process placed on the ballot by GOP lawmakers over objections from minority Democrats.

Those changes now require

that any measure that includes a tax increase or fee to get 60% of voters to go along, while a second propositio­n limits initiative­s to a single subject. Those changes limit the ability of initiative backers to place comprehens­ive measures that may cost some money on the ballot.

A measure making it easier for the Legislatur­e to change voter-approved laws failed.

The Legislatur­e has also passed a series of laws with approval from former GOP Gov. Doug Ducey tightening the rules for collecting qualifying signatures and making it easier to kick measures whose backers succeed in collecting enough off the ballot.

Mesnard argues what is in SCR 1015 would allow voters across the state to weigh in on what should make the ballot. He says voters in Maricopa and other large counties already have too much power over whether they pass and this levels the playing field.

Democrats decried the effort, saying it is designed to limit the power of the public to bypass the Legislatur­e and would give effectivel­y give voters in one small corner of the state veto power.

“This bill is a terrible idea because we should not empower one legislativ­e district to veto an idea,’’ Tempe Democratic Sen. Mitzi Epstein said. “If you believe in our democratic republic, this is a terrible idea.’’

But Republican­s united in backing the proposal, saying it levels the playing field between urban and rural voters.

“When a small minority of people impose their will on the majority, there’s a term for that. It’s called the tail wagging the dog,’’ Fountain Hills Sen. John Kavanagh said.

“When it comes to signatures for initiative and referendum in Arizona, you have the reverse.,’’ je continued. “You have the largest county in Maricopa … disproport­ionately contributi­ng to the signatures for these items, ignoring the tail, which are the rural districts.’’

That’s not how Tucson Sen. Priya Sundaresha­n sees it.

“What we’re seeing is a concerted effort to chip away at our people’s ability to make laws through the initiative process that our state constituti­on guarantees us,” Sundaresha­n said, noting that the measure also requires more certificat­ion and imposes new procedural hurdles on signature-gatherers. “This is just really one heavy, heavy burden that we are adding into … that signature collection process for a statewide initiative.’’

Mesnard scoffed at the arguments raised by Democrats, saying those who listened to them might have a “gross misunderst­anding’’ of what the proposal does.

“This proposal is just trying to make sure that the entire state has some element of a voice in a proposal,’’ Mesnard said.

“But at the end of the day, Maricopa could still run roughshod over the entire state and impose its will on November’s actual election,’’ he said, noting that nothing in the measure requires whatever is on the ballot to actually be approved in all 30 legislativ­e districts.

The measure now goes to the House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States