Yuma Sun

Bill would expand state tax credit to include months of pregnancy

Another arizona bill would allow pregnant women to drive in carpool lanes

- BY HOWARD FISCHER

PHOENIX – The way Matt Gress sees it, a person is a person, no matter how small – or even if not born yet – for the purposes of getting a state tax credit.

The first-term Republican representa­tive from Phoenix wants to expand state law providing for a tax credit for children to also include the number of months a woman was pregnant. He tells Capitol Media Services that HB 2501 is only fair, as families have expenses during that period, too.

But that isn’t Gress’ only foray into the question of who is a person.

He is separately sponsoring HB 2417 which would allow pregnant women to drive in the lane reserved for carpooling. Gress said he sees no difference between a woman who may be ready to give birth and a woman who puts her dayold child into an infant seat and qualifies under current law to use the high-occupancy vehicle lane.

So far, though, Gress has gotten no traction for that measure. In fact, it never even got assigned by House leadership to a committee for a hearing.

That’s not the case with the tax credit which gained preliminar­y House approval on Wednesday.

Arizona law allows individual­s earning less than $200,000 a year to get a $100 income tax credit – an amount deducted from the actual taxes owed to the state – for each child younger than 17. The income eligibilit­y figure is $400,000 for married couples filing jointly.

Dependent children 17 and older qualify a family for a $25 per child credit.

Only thing is, current law applies that credit only for the years after a child is born. Gress said there’s no reason for what he sees as an artificial cutoff.

“There still are pregnancy related costs that expectant families go through, either doctor’s visits or getting the baby’s room set up,’’ he said.

What it also is, Gress said, is unfair.

Consider, he said, a woman who has a baby in September. The family gets to claim the tax credit for the entire calendar year even though the baby is around for only four months of that tax year.

“But what if the baby’s born in January?’’ Gress asked.

“That family’s experience­d costs prior to the baby being born,’’ he said. But the tax credits kick in only after the baby is born.

As HB 2501 is crafted, tax credits could be claimed for the year prior to birth on a pro-rata basis.

So, the family whose baby is born in January would get to claim 75% of the credit for nine months of the prior year. Similarly, a family that had a baby in June would get 50% of the credit for the six months of pregnancy in the prior calendar year.

Legislativ­e budget staffers said their best estimate of what that would cost the state is $2.4 million per year based on the assumption of babies being conceived from April through December and the pregnancy lasting nine months.

He isn’t alone in his views that there should be some tax considerat­ion for pre-birth expenses.

During debate in the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Neal Carter, R-san Tan Valley, said he got to claim a full tax credit after his wife gave birth just 11 days before the end of the calendar year. Yet he said if the pregnancy had continued for two weeks later, into the new calendar year, there would be no tax benefit.

Rep. Mariana Sandoval, D-goodyear, said she appreciate­s the intent of the bill.

“But if we were really serious about helping families we would make health care accessible and affordable to everyone so that we wouldn’t have to hear a bill that gives a single person that makes up to $200,000 a $100 credit,’’ she said. “I don’t know how that would help families that are really in need.’’

Gress said he can speak only from his own experience.

“I’m the youngest of four, raised by a single mom,’’ he said, saying that his mother took advantage of the tax credits proposed and signed into law in 2001 by then-president George W. Bush. That was in addition to the federal Earned Income Tax Credit designed to provide a benefit to the working poor.

“We were able to get new clothes for school, school supplies,’’ Gress said. “I mean, it was huge.’’

He said while the state tax credit is nowhere near as large as either of the federal credits, “every dollar counts, especially in this inflation.’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States