Daily Nation Newspaper

Project Management

MSP®, PMP®, PRINCE2® Practition­er, P2Agile®, COBIT®, ITIL®. Laban is a consultant and trainer in project management and specifical­ly trainer/coach in Agile, PMP®, PRINCE2® Practition­er, PRINCE2 Agile® in Zambia, South Africa and Europe for many years. Th

- BY DR LABAN MWANSA,

IN our talk this week we will look at some of the most frequently asked questions in the domain of project management standards, training, certificat­ion and qualificat­ion credential­s. We will also try to look at the importance of adopting a project management methodolog­y by companies and organizati­ons. The benefits and value of getting project management accreditat­ion, certificat­ion by individual­s and organizati­ons are immerse.

Like the saying goes that if you think adopting and getting training in project management best practice methodolog­ies is expensive, then try ignorance. The negative consequenc­es of not having a project management methodolog­y in place are huge and outweighs the investment required in getting trained, certified and accreditat­ion. When project management credential­s are achieved, the career growth and prospects for individual­s get brighter as many career doors get opened and also adds on personal confidence of project managers when running or supervisin­g projects on behalf of sponsors. In simple terms if a piece of work is difficult enough to be classified as a project, then it requires someone competent to carry out the role of project managing it and that’s the project manager. This also makes project management profession to cut across all domains and economical sectors.

Organizati­ons and companies who invest in project management methodolog­ies benefit from huge savings accrued from avoiding project failures such as project time and budget overruns, the cost of rework resulting in quality non-conformanc­e and other negative vices which may culminate as result of un managed risks and issues during the life of the project.

We can allude to the two most popular project management certificat­ion standards which are PRINCE2® (PRojects IN Controlled Environmen­ts) syllabus version 2 adopted in 2017 and Project

Management Profession­al (PMP®) based on now 6th edition of PMBoK guide® . These certificat­ions do not compete but rather complement each other and I don’t think they compete and this should provide an answer to the most question frequently asked: which one is better PMP or PRINCE2? These certificat­ions are revised every 3-4 years in order to keep them responsive to industry. Difference­s between PRINCE2 (a method) and a Body of Knowledge (BoK) make them highly complement­ary and on a high level can be summarized as

• PRINCE2: deals with what needs to be done, by whom and when in a project

• PMBoK: deals with tools and techniques of how those things can be done in a project

Tailoring PRINCE2 if the organizati­on is aligned to any particular PMBoK should include:

• Agreeing a single set of terms to apply. For example, in the Associatio­n for Project Management’s Body of Knowledge the steering group is equivalent to PRINCE2’s Project Board. •Aligning PRINCE2’s management products with any management products recommende­d by the BoK. For example, in PMBoK the project charter is equivalent to PRINCE2’s Project Brief.

The two qualificat­ions complement each other with one filling in knowledge or structure where the other lacks. Both standards are process based therefore can easily be audited and ca be subjected to health checks. PRINCE2® is a methodolog­y, addressing things on a procedural level whereas PMP is an encyclopae­dia of best practices in project management, telling project managers what they need to know in terms of tools and techniques but leaving the applicatio­n to them. For example, the PMBoK guide is not prescripti­ve but descriptiv­e. It speaks to knowledge areas or subjects in a specific sense, talking about how to calculate the schedule critical path, stakeholde­r evaluation, requiremen­ts gathering, etc.

PRINCE2® however talks more about the reporting structures, roles and responsibi­lities and the flow of management deliverabl­es (i.e. reports and exceptions). It doesn’t get into the details of scheduling, because each organizati­on has its own methods to do this, and whilst it recognizes the importance of stakeholde­rs, it doesn’t elaborate on stakeholde­r analysis. These specific examples of the difference­s between PRINCE2® and PMP® also highlight the complement­ary and collaborat­ive nature of the two project management standards.

PRINCE2® is widely considered the leading project management method. It is now available in 15 languages. There are now more and more people qualified in PRINCE2® project management in many countries around the world. Many companies and government­al organizati­ons are using the method to deliver change and develop new products or services. PRINCE2® provides a tried and tested method from which organizati­ons can benefit. Many projects today involve collaborat­ion across organizati­onal or even national boundaries.

This article was written by Dr Laban Mwansa, MSP®, PMP®, PRINCE2® Practition­er, Agile®, Laban is a consultant and trainer in project management can be reached at: Laban. Mwansa@ betaways- innovation­s.com, +2609752803­92 or WhatsApp +2781702966­9. He is also a profession­al project management member of PMSA and PMI-USA.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zambia