Chronicle (Zimbabwe)

Reasonable suspicion Prof Jonathan Moyo committed crime, Prosecutor-General says

- Daniel Nemukuyu

ACTING Prosecutor-General Advocate Ray Goba has said criminal allegation­s against Higher and Tertiary Education, Science and Technology Developmen­t Minister Professor Jonathan Moyo are well-substantia­ted and urged the Constituti­onal Court to issue an order compelling him to appear before a magistrate within 24 hours to answer to the charges.

Prof Moyo, together with his deputy Godfrey Gandawa and a Zimbabwe Manpower Developmen­t Fund finance director Nicholas Mapute, is accused of abusing nearly $500 000 belonging to Zimdef.

Deputy Minister Gandawa and Mapute have since been placed on remand at the Harare Magistrate­s’ Court, but Prof Moyo filed an applicatio­n at the Constituti­onal Court challengin­g the constituti­onality of his arrest.

Responding to Minister Moyo’s challenge, Adv Goba said his office had perused the docket prepared by the investigat­ors and reached a conclusion that there was an “overwhelmi­ngly reasonable suspicion” that the politician and his accomplice­s committed fraud, theft, money laundering and criminal abuse of office.

“Upon perusal and proper considerat­ion, it was concluded that the allegation­s were said Adv Goba.

“It was further considered that there was, on the facts, most of which have not been disputed by the applicant (Minister Moyo), an overwhelmi­ngly reasonable suspicion that the crimes of fraud, theft, money laundering and abuse of office had been committed by the applicant, other perpetrato­rs and socii criminii working as a syndicate or racket,” he said.

“The applicant personally benefited from the proceeds of fraudulent diversion of funds from Zimdef accounts, to accounts operated by Godfrey Gandawa, his deputy, through a beneficial­ly-owned company called Fuzzy Technologi­es and another belonging to an associate,” reads Adv Goba’s opposing affidavit.

To that end, Adv Goba urged the court to dismiss with costs the constituti­onal challenge by Minister Moyo and instead direct that he immediatel­y surrenders himself to the investigat­ors and appear before a wellsubsta­ntiated,” magistrate to answer to the charges. “The applicatio­n should be dismissed with the contempt it richly deserves with costs on the higher scale and order that the applicant surrenders to the investigat­ing officer for purposes of appearance before a magistrate within 24 hours of the order of this Honourable Court in accordance with due process,” he said. Adv Goba and his team of chief law officers also picked from the docket that Minister Moyo had authorised various transactio­ns in which Zimdef lost close to $500 000. “The applicant, on several occasions, approved fraudulent transactio­ns which authorised the release of funds to Fuzzy Technologi­es and was at the end, among others, the recipient of some of the funds by way of cash loans and payments from goods such as bicycles and tricycles for chiefs and villagers in his Tsholotsho constituen­cy and furniture, as well as for unverifiab­le services purportedl­y rendered by other persons.

“An amount of almost half a million United States dollars in public funds, a very substantia­l amount by any account, is involved,” reads the affidavit.

Adv Goba denied ever directing the police to arrest Minister Moyo, but instead said he only directed the Police Commission­er-General to follow due process of the law and assist in the finalisati­on of investigat­ions by the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission.

The Acting PG said Minister Moyo did not deserve to be treated differentl­y from other suspects.

“In the premise, it is respectful­ly submitted that the principle of equality before the law and the right to equal protection and benefit of the law enshrined in Section 50 of the Constituti­on is sacrosanct and must be observed.

“The wheels of justice must be allowed to swiftly turn so that justice is not only done, but is seen to be done,” he said.

“I submit that applicant’s applicatio­n is unpreceden­ted, violates the equality clause under Section 50 of the Constituti­on, is premature and wholly devoid of merit,” he said.

Minister Moyo earlier this month approached the apex court a day after his release challengin­g the manner in which he was arrested by Zacc on allegation­s of abusing in excess of $400 000 of Zimdef funds.

Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausik­u suspended the arrest of Minister Moyo, who was being represente­d by Advocate Lewis Uriri instructed by Mr Terrence Hussein, with the consent of the State.

In his main applicatio­n, Minister Moyo is questionin­g the constituti­onality of his arrest by Zacc and the role played by the police.

He argues that Zacc does not, in terms of the Constituti­on, have the power to arrest and detain suspects.

He also argues that the PG does not, in terms of the Constituti­on, have the power to order the police to arrest an individual.

He sought to stop his appearance in court, describing it as an illegality.

The investigat­ing officer, Sergeant Munyaradzi Chacha, he argued, could not be part of Zacc and the police at the same time, while Mr Goba had no power to order his arrest.

The court directed the parties to file all the relevant papers by December 2 this year, before the Registrar of the Constituti­onal Court set the matter down for hearing before a full bench of the apex court.

 ??  ?? Professor Jonathan Moyo
Professor Jonathan Moyo

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe