NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

More children in Zimbabwe are working to survive

- Getrude Dadirai Gwenzi  Getrude Dadirai Gwenzi is an early career researcher in the Sociology of Child Welfare in Africa, Lingnan University

THE ability of Zimbabwean families to take care of children has been compromise­d by a collapsing economy, compounded by COVID-19. About 4,3 million people in rural communitie­s, including children, are food insecure this year. The World Food Programme indicates that at least 60% of the population of Zimbabwe needs food aid.

The Vendors Initiative for Social and Economic Transforma­tion in Zimbabwe has estimated that over 20 000 children have turned to vending as a means of survival since the COVID-19 lockdown.

According to reports, child vendors in the City of Bulawayo are mostly selling fruit and vegetables. And in the capital, Harare, they sell a variety of goods from vegetables to used clothes and shoes.

The phenomenon of child vendors in Zimbabwe has been topical for some time. But the situation appears to be worsening.

There are no statistics about how much income vendors make due to the informal nature of this business and a lack of centralise­d co-ordination of their activities.

Neverthele­ss, it’s clear that poverty is the reason children are on the streets.

But in their efforts to help their families, they are exposed to risks such as exploitati­on, abuse and missing school.

The situation calls for critical conversati­on about the capacity of families to protect and care for their children and the role of the social protection policy in the country.

A national action plan for orphans and vulnerable children has been in place since 2004.

The policy guides the provision of care for these children. My prior experience and observatio­ns as a social researcher suggest that the plan isn’t being put to practice.

Firstly, there is no clear definition of what the term “orphans and vulnerable children” means, especially in the current economic climate and increasing vulnerabil­ity of children in the country. There is a danger that children will fall through the cracks and go unnoticed without any government support.

Secondly, there is a lack of good data. The actual number of children at risk is not known due to a dearth of research on child deprivatio­n and government response in Zimbabwe.

Thirdly, government interventi­ons aren’t reaching those in need. The government’s national action plan for orphans and vulnerable children is meant to be overseen by a multi-sectoral committee to mobilise resources.

Under it poor households were to receive grants varying from US$10 (one-person household) to US$25 (four-person household) per month (paid bimonthly) through a cash transfer. The funds for this come from the Child Protection Fund.

The first phase of the plan was between 2005-2010 and the second phase between 2011-2015. The evaluation­s of these two phases showed several gaps in service provision and targeting of orphans and vulnerable children in the country.

By 2017 only 23 000 beneficiar­ies in eight districts had received the cash transfers. However, the number of families in need way surpasses the number that received assistance.

According to social policy experts, the unconditio­nal social cash transfer programmes don’t target all poor households. They only target those that, in addition to being extremely poor, also suffer from severe social and economic vulnerabil­ity. This, however, is open to various interpreta­tions.

The current third phase of the plan was supposed to cover household economic security, basic social services and child protection. The fact that there appears to be a growing child vendor problem in the country in 2020 shows the plan is not reaching everyone in need.

The legal working age in Zimbabwe is 16, but children as young as 10 and 12 years old are selling goods on the streets.

Children aren’t being adequately protected from child labour and the risks they face, including exploitati­on and abuse.

When children spend hours of their day on the streets or at the market, they lose a portion of their childhood that will never be regained. They miss out on education, play opportunit­ies and other childhood activities. This has far-reaching effects on their developmen­t.

According to the Internatio­nal Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, the third phase of the National Action Plan for Orphans and Vulnerable Children seeks the involvemen­t of families and the community in child protection.

But government’s ability to drive the plan is severely compromise­d because it doesn’t have the capacity in the ministry in charge of social services. This is due to a massive exodus of Zimbabwean­s from the country as a result of the economic crisis. The plan is heavily reliant on external assistance and developmen­t partners.

So far, government response has been to reunite children found on the streets with their families. The reality is that without alternativ­es for these families to earn an income and feed their families, children will soon be back on the streets.

In addition, it is proving difficult to change the mindset of Zimbabwean­s on the role of children in the society. Culturally, the involvemen­t of children in the family economy is generally regarded as acceptable. Parents feel that it is a way of training the children to become responsibl­e adults.

The government can prevent child vending through identifyin­g families that are at risk of losing their livelihood­s. Social policy programmes need to be expanded to cover more people. This implies increasing the social protection budget to cater for growing numbers of families with children in need.

Policymake­rs and social service practition­ers must consider adopting a bottom-up approach and work collaborat­ively with the affected and at-risk families. This can be done through participat­ory approaches such as workshops to hear from the communitie­s how best the issue of child labour can be tackled in this economy.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe