NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

Nature’s critical role in managing climate change requires human interventi­ons

- Peter Makwanya Peter Makwanya is a climate change communicat­or. He writes in his personal capacity.

THE discourse of climate change is not complete without nature-based solutions. Ever since humanity started engaging in climate change interventi­ons, the phrase, “naturebase­d solutions” is overused in isolation. This comes as a result of leaving behind people who matter in driving sustainabl­e and meaningful change in their communitie­s. These are the local communitie­s which live with nature.

Local communitie­s are practical and they do their work experienti­ally according to their worldview and cultural relevance.

They always take the climate change fight to where it happens and as it unfolds. They don’t exaggerate but they interact with nature for positive solutions.

As the impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution from extreme heat and storms is having a devastatin­g effect on the land, local communitie­s do not look for solutions further from their own horizons. Their situations provide them with solutions. Although research is a critical component in this regard, it taps more from these community knowledge and informatio­n repositori­es.

This research will be published later and become a body of knowledge for academics, students and profession­als to access but nothing is said about the local communitie­s who provided the informatio­n to the researcher­s.

From the time when local communitie­s share their knowledge with researcher­s, they are ignored and their roles overlooked whereas credit is given to outsiders who travel from afar to document what locals already know.

Local communitie­s have been presiding over nature-based solutions aimed at managing climate change impacts and protect biodiversi­ty in the process, including human communitie­s by bolstering ecosystems that store carbon undergroun­d.

History has it that, the most effective nature-based solutions have been developed by local communitie­s.

For these reasons, seeds of doubt have been sawn and it remains to be seen if the climate change protection policies being articulate­d to the people around the world are the best for the people and the planet.

Monetisati­on of nature cannot provide the right tonic for the environmen­t. Monetisati­on of nature cannot help tell the stories which shame behaviours that promote environmen­tal destructio­n around the world.

As nature is being monetised and incentivis­ed, a new wave of fossil fuels exploratio­n is happening around the globe, making these highly publicised interventi­ons just a paradox.

While the multinatio­nal conglomera­tes are busy engaging in climate collapse activities, they are also at the forefront of funding green energy technologi­es.

They have traumatise­d the entire world through their sinister antics driven by the power of money, disregard of humanity and selfishnes­s.

As they engage in a trajectory of destructio­n, they are also incentivis­ing developing countries for doing green business. By adopting nature-based solutions, humanity is not only saving forests and the planet but itself as well.

In terms of the zeal and drive to save the environmen­t, local communitie­s are intrinsica­lly motivated to do so.

Although monetary benefits are essential, they do not drive the local communitie­s’ passion to save the environmen­t.

What drives their passion is intrinsica­l motivation to secure their homelands, protect their sacred places, history, culture, identity and the resources that they depend on for their sustainabl­e livelihood­s. The unfortunat­e undoing about the whole conservati­on and climate protection scenario is that the local communitie­s have a voice but its suppressed. Until such a time when the local communitie­s can tell their own climate stories, there will not be any meaningful interventi­ons across the globe.

They need to be their own voices and articulati­ng issues from their local experience­s. Local communitie­s are duty-bound to protect both humanity and all living things.

The climate protection strategies are currently being driven in the absence of morals, values, ethical considerat­ions and stewardshi­p we all share in caring for the God-given resources.

The advantage of soliciting for the voices of the local communitie­s is that they do not require policy in order to spearhead the climate protection strategies but protecting nature is their way of life.

There is no way the fight against climate change impacts can succeed without these important stakeholde­rs and foot soldiers no matter how we may want to be smart in controllin­g reality.

Finally, local communitie­s have one of the most important skills, which is listening. They do not pretend but they listen deeper and actively.

They follow their traditiona­l knowledge and wisdom, they also listen to their elders and community knowledge banks.

They listen to the earth and build resilience in the process hence they are change makers in their own right. They also listen even to those who make them homeless due to their greed and expansioni­st policies.

Above all, they do not exaggerate their own value because they are human beings. They are wise in their local knowledge and wisdom but not otherwise in their manner of doing things and approachin­g reality.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe