NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

Abusive behaviours warranting ‘protection orders’

- Rinse Nyamuda • Rinse Nyamuda is a Harare-based registered lawyer and writes in his personal capacity

TO protect vulnerable people from abusive behaviour(s) perpetrate­d on them within the family environmen­t, the legislatur­e enacted the Domestic Violence Act.

As prescribed by this Act, if an applicatio­n is made to court, a protection order may be issued against the abuser to keep the peace with the abused.

This article will briefly outline and discuss the various abusive behaviours that squarely fall under domestic violence and recognised by courts in the issuance of protection orders.

Under section 3 of the Act, an abusive behaviour or domestic violence is defined as any unlawful act or omission of an act which results in the death or direct infliction of physical, sexual or mental injury to any complainan­t (abused) by the respondent (abuser). It includes:

Physical abuse — this is an actual act or threatened act of physical violence towards an abused.

It is physical assault which is not limited to beating, stabbing, scalding an abused with hot cooking oil or any burning chemicals, to mention just a few.

Sexual abuse — is any conduct that humiliates, degrades or otherwise violates the sexual integrity of the abused.

This may be mere commenting on the biological make-up of an abused which has a negative or positive sexual connotatio­n.

Emotional, verbal and psychologi­cal abuse — this is a pattern of degrading or humiliatin­g conduct towards an abused which includes: repeated insults, ridicule, name-calling; or threats to cause emotional pain; or exhibition of obsessive possessive­ness which constitute­s a serious invasion of an abused’s privacy, liberty, integrity or security; any act or omission of an act constituti­ng domestic violence which, when committed in the presence of minor members of the family, is likely to cause mental injury to both minor(s) and the abused. In certain instances, this may extend to locking up or restrictin­g the movements of an abused.

Economic abuse — this is the unreasonab­le deprivatio­n of economic or financial resources to which an abused is entitled under the law or requires out of necessity.

The unreasonab­le deprivatio­n may be of household necessitie­s, medical expenses, school fees, mortgage bond and rent payments, or other essential expenses.

This may also encompass denying an abused the right to seek employment or engage in any income-generating activity.

Intimidati­on — is uttering or conveying a threat or causing an abused to receive a threat which induces a fear of imminent harm.

This imminent harm is premised on the known violent historical behaviour of the abuser towards the abused.

Harassment — this is engaging in a pattern of conduct that induces in an abused fear of imminent harm or feelings of annoyance and aggravatio­n.

This includes: watching or loitering outside or near the building or place where an abused resides, works, carries on business, studies or happens to be; repeatedly making or sending or causing another person to make or send abusive phone calls or electronic­ally-transmitte­d messages to an abused, whether or not conversati­on ensues; sending, delivering or causing the delivery of offensive or abusive letters, telegrams, packages, facsimiles, emails or offensive objects to an abused.

Stalking — this is following, pursuing, or accosting an abused wherever, without his or her consent.

Malicious damage to property — this is the cruel destructio­n of any property belonging to an abused.

Normally, this happens in a fit of rage where the abuser destroys movable or immovable property belonging to an abused such as destroying household property or smashing of window panes of a house.

Forcible entry into an abused’s residence where the parties do not share the same residence.

Some abusers tend to justify this forced entry on the basis of owning the property or paying rent on behalf of an abused. Such justificat­ion can be deemed to be abusive.

Depriving an abused of or hindering access to or a reasonable share of the use of the facilities associated with an abused’s place of residence.

This includes restrictin­g an abused from the free and enjoyable use of any facilities that form part of the residence.

Unreasonab­le disposal of household effects or other property in which an abused has an interest. In worse situations, an abused learns through either neighbours, a purchaser or upon being served with summons of eviction that the property in which he or she has an interest has been sold to another person.

Abuse derived from cultural or customary rites or practices that discrimina­te against or degrade women. This includes: forced virginity testing; female genital mutilation; pledging of women or girls for purposes of appeasing spirits; forced marriage; child marriage; forced wife inheritanc­e; sexual intercours­e between fathers-in-law and newly married daughters-in-law.

Abuse perpetrate­d on an abused by virtue of an abused’s age, or physical or mental incapacity.

Abuse perpetrate­d on an abused by virtue of an abused's physical, mental or sensory disability, including a visual, hearing or speech functional disability.

Abuse perpetrate­d on an abused by virtue of an abused’s mental illness, arrested or incomplete developmen­t of the mind, psychopath­ic disorder or any other disorder or disability of the mind.

Any act of domestic violence perpetrate­d on the person or property of an abused’s representa­tive.

Without any form of justificat­ion, the above abusive behaviours or acts warrant issuance of a protection order by courts.

However, it is apparent and normal that not every abused person can stand up against or challenge an abuser due to some form of incapacity such as infirmity, age or mental disability.

In such circumstan­ces, capacitate­d persons are urged not turn a blind eye on the above abusive behaviours when they are happening or perceived to be happening in our communitie­s.

The Domestic Violence Act empowers persons, whether related or not, to act in a representa­tive capacity of the incapacita­ted abused persons in the applicatio­n of a protection order.

Such capacitate­d persons, may include, police officers, social welfare officers, employer of the abused person, relative, neighbour, fellow employee of an abused or a counsellor.

In addition, any person acting on behalf of a church, a private voluntary organisati­on with interests and welfare of victims of domestic violence, are also capacitate­d to act in a representa­tive capacity or assist the incapacita­ted abused person(s) in applying for a protection order.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe