NewsDay (Zimbabwe)

guest What Africa negotiator­s should aim for at COP26 Glasgow 2021?

- Mitchell Mahachi Mitchell Mahachi is a masters student in climate change management at the Weihenstep­hanTriesdo­rf University of Applied Sciences (HSWT) in Germany. He writes here in his personal capacity.

NEGOTIATOR­S on behalf of Africa have a challengin­g two weeks during the annual UN climate change conference as they represent more than 1,2 billion people back home and are not expected to come empty-handed or with a bag full of empty promises. The conference presents an opportunit­y which Africa cannot miss. Africa is heavily affected by climate change and needs resources for adaptation and also mitigation. She also needs to send out a strong message to the developed world to reduce their emissions and attain a less than 2°C temperatur­e increase against the business as usual currently prevailing.

The team

Africa is represente­d in two groups at the COP26 meetings, that is the least developed countries where 33 of 54 African countries are present, then the Africa group of negotiator­s (AGN) where all 54 African countries are members.

The least developed countries website is surprising­ly more comprehens­ive and has up to date informatio­n than the African group of negotiator­s.

One hopes this does not reflect on the state of readiness of the latter. The website can be a very important tool as a repository of informatio­n for building capacity of future climate negotiator­s and informing various stakeholde­rs.

Negotiatin­g climate change between unequal parties

The climate negotiatio­ns between Africa and the developed world have been described as negotiatio­ns between unequal partners.

For instance, the first round of National Determined Contributi­ons in many African countries were largely dominated and written by internatio­nal consultant­s.

It is akin to the numerous internatio­nal coaches in African football and the continent keeps hoping to win the World Cup. However, the African group of negotiator­s have proved their mettle at previous conference­s and are expected to obtain tangible results from COP26 Glasgow.

What is at stake for Africa?

It is difficult to fathom and express the dire situation of climate change and its impact on Africa and its very survival.

COP26 carries the weight of Africa’s problems and solutions. Key results of the Global Climate Risk Index 2020 by Germanwatc­h reveals that three countries namely Madagascar, Rwanda and Kenya are among the top 10 most affected countries by climate change. The Global Climate Risk Index (CRI) for 2021 shows five African countries as the worst affected namely Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Malawi, South Sudan and Niger from the top 10 list.

Due to the fact that most of the countries in Africa are not adequately insured for climate change shocks, the already vulnerable communitie­s are left in an even more precarious state.

The African climate policy centre projects that the gross domestic product (GDP) in the five African sub-regions would suffer significan­t decreases as a result of a global temperatur­e increase. For scenarios ranging from a 1°C to a 4°C increase in global temperatur­es relative to preindustr­ial levels, the continent’s overall GDP currently estimated at around US$2,6 trillion, is expected to decrease by 2,25% to 12,12%.

What makes the whole situation complex is that the contributi­on of African countries to global emissions was only 3,7% in 2018, yet it is the hardest hit by climate change impacts.

AR6 findings on Africa

An assessment of observed changes in hot extremes shows an increase throughout Africa and a high confidence in human contributi­on to the observed changes.

Africa again shows an increase in heavy precipitat­ion, but the confidence of human contributi­on is low due to disagreeme­nt.

The picture is the same again in respect of agricultur­al and ecological drought which shows an increase and the confidence of human contributi­on is also low due to disagreeme­nt. Given that most African economies are dominated by agricultur­e, this spells doom for the continent.

A colleague of mine once told me that when you go for negotiatio­ns, do not go with a bagful of arguments. He posited going with a few arguments and sticking to them through thick and thin. I believe this is one scenario where his argument may come handy. The issue of the US$100 billion pledge is fraught with grey areas and, therefore, could be the trump card the AGN must stick to and apply pressure on the developed nations to have climate targets that are more ambitious given the little window period of opportunit­y left.

US$100 billion support

Without doubt, the issue of climate finance is at the heart of COP26. It is only fair that in 2009, the world’s richest nations pledged to provide $100 billion of funding every year by 2020 to help developing countries tackle the climate crisis, but that goal was never attained. Only $79,6 billion was made available in 2019, the latest year for which data is available, according to the Paris-based OECD. Failure to meet this target has implicatio­ns on the trust and solidarity between the developed and developing nations ahead of COP26. This could potentiall­y derail the conference as the latter question the sincerity of the former’s commitment to meet emission targets.

Allocation of responsibi­lity

For starters, there is no internatio­nally agreed basis for allocation of the $100 billion pledge among the developed countries. Germany internally is reported to consider its share at about 10% of the sum, but has never officially endorsed this. The USA is considered to be at around 40% but has never come forward to endorse this percentage. As it stands, no country can be brought to book because they have failed to contribute their share of the US$100 billion pledge. Surprising­ly, the Nato alliance clearly states that members are to commit 2% of their overall spending on the military, yet the same members are quiet on such a matter of immense importance. This casts doubts on the sincerity of some nations, thereby endangerin­g the conference altogether. Also team Africa could propose a mechanism for the payment of the US$100 billion based on a function of a nation’s emission contributi­ons, its NDCs and performanc­e on them, among other criteria.

As a preconditi­on for the COP26 to proceed, team Africa should demand the payment of the outstandin­g amount from the US$100 billion. If for some reason the developed nations are unable to pay, such as the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, then they could have their outstandin­g balances recorded as I owe you to pay later. This is why it is important to allot responsibi­lity to each of the developed nations.

Time to homogenise climate finance

There are a lot of cross hairs on what is implied by climate finance. Some countries provide only grants as climate finance, while others count loans to developing countries, which must be repaid. For example, France, Japan and Germany, who are the highest contributo­rs, provided most of their finance through loans. Most of the countries ranked in the middle provided the majority of their finance as grants, which requires more budgetary effort for contributo­rs but is more desirable for resource-strapped developing nations.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Zimbabwe